bug-fix
Bug-fixing workflow that coordinates diagnosis, test-driven reproduction, root-cause analysis, and targeted fixes. Use when the…
Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs -a windsurf -y
name: tidy-docs description: Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval. model: opus
Spawns a `doc-maintainer` agent to comprehensively audit all project documentation and fix the issues it finds. The find→fix seam is small — typos, stale code examples, broken links, freshness drift — so the skill runs as a tidy rather than a review.
Spawn a `DOC - Maintainer` agent with the following prompt:
Perform a comprehensive review of ALL project documentation. This is a standalone audit — do NOT scope to git diff. Instead, review every documentation file in the project. Steps: 1. Discover all documentation files (README.md, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CHANGELOG.md, doc/, docs/, adr/, and any other .md files) 2. Review each for correctness, completeness, and freshness using your full quality checklist (code-documentation consistency, completeness, link validation, style consistency, freshness) 3. Fix issues you find autonomously (within your authority) 4. Report what you changed and any issues requiring user approval If no documentation issues are found, report that and exit.
After the agent completes, present its findings to the user:
If changes were made, ask the user if they want to commit. If yes:
git add [specific files] git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' docs: tidy project documentation [Brief description of changes made] EOF )"
A system of composable software engineering workflows for Claude Code. Plan projects, implement tickets, and run quality passes — from a single ticket to a multi-batch project, using the same layered architecture.
Bug-fixing workflow that coordinates diagnosis, test-driven reproduction, root-cause analysis, and targeted fixes. Use when the…
Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused…
Multi-ticket batch workflow. Takes a batch of tickets, plans execution order, implements each via /implement in autonomous mode,…
Full-lifecycle project workflow. Takes batched tickets, implements via /implement-batch, runs smoke tests, then executes a…
Iterative development workflow that coordinates implementation, refactoring, QA, and documentation agents to complete features…
Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.