bug-fix
Bug-fixing workflow that coordinates diagnosis, test-driven reproduction, root-cause analysis, and targeted fixes. Use when the user wants to fix a bug with…
Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.
$ npx -y skills add chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows --skill tidy-docs --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/tidy-docsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.
name: tidy-docs description: Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval. model: opus
Spawns a `doc-maintainer` agent to comprehensively audit all project documentation and fix the issues it finds. The find→fix seam is small — typos, stale code examples, broken links, freshness drift — so the skill runs as a tidy rather than a review.
Spawn a `DOC - Maintainer` agent with the following prompt:
Perform a comprehensive review of ALL project documentation. This is a standalone audit — do NOT scope to git diff. Instead, review every documentation file in the project. Steps: 1. Discover all documentation files (README.md, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CHANGELOG.md, doc/, docs/, adr/, and any other .md files) 2. Review each for correctness, completeness, and freshness using your full quality checklist (code-documentation consistency, completeness, link validation, style consistency, freshness) 3. Fix issues you find autonomously (within your authority) 4. Report what you changed and any issues requiring user approval If no documentation issues are found, report that and exit.
After the agent completes, present its findings to the user:
If changes were made, ask the user if they want to commit. If yes:
git add [specific files] git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' docs: tidy project documentation [Brief description of changes made] EOF )"
A system of composable software engineering workflows for Claude Code. Plan projects, implement tickets, and run quality passes — from a single ticket to a multi-batch project, using the same layered architecture.
Repo: chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows
Bug-fixing workflow that coordinates diagnosis, test-driven reproduction, root-cause analysis, and targeted fixes. Use when the user wants to fix a bug with…
Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write…
Multi-ticket batch workflow. Takes a batch of tickets, plans execution order, implements each via /implement in autonomous mode, runs cross-cutting quality…
Full-lifecycle project workflow. Takes batched tickets, implements via /implement-batch, runs smoke tests, then executes a comprehensive quality pipeline…
Iterative development workflow that coordinates implementation, refactoring, QA, and documentation agents to complete features systematically. Use when the…
Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At…