Skip to content
Development
Skill

/algo-social-engagement

\"Calculate and benchmark social media engagement rates across platforms and variants. Use this skill when the user needs to compute engagement metrics, compare performance across accounts or posts, or set engagement benchmarks — even if they say 'what is my engagement rate',

From plugin
awesome-agent-skill
26200 skills4 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill algo-social-engagement --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/algo-social-engagement

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

\"Calculate and benchmark social media engagement rates across platforms and variants. Use this skill when the user needs to compute engagement metrics, compare performance across accounts or posts, or set engagement benchmarks — even if they say 'what is my engagement rate',

SKILL.md

algo-social-engagement.SKILL.md
name: "\"algo-social-engagement\""
description: "\"Calculate and benchmark social media engagement rates across platforms and variants. Use this skill when the user needs to compute engagement metrics, compare performance across accounts or posts, or set engagement benchmarks — even if they say 'what is my engagement rate', 'benchmark engagement', or 'social media KPIs'.\"."
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep

Engagement Rate Calculation

Overview

Engagement rate measures audience interaction relative to reach or audience size. Formula: (reactions + comments + shares) / denominator × 100%. The denominator choice (reach, impressions, followers) significantly affects the result. Computes in O(n) per post set.

When to Use

**Trigger conditions:**

  • Computing engagement metrics for social media reporting
  • Benchmarking account or post performance against industry averages
  • Comparing content performance across posts or accounts

**When NOT to use:**

  • When evaluating influence holistically (use influence measurement)
  • When modeling content spread dynamics (use virality models)

Algorithm

IRON LAW: Engagement Rate Denominator MATTERS
By reach, by impressions, and by followers produce DIFFERENT numbers:
- ER by Reach = engagements / reach × 100% (most accurate, requires analytics access)
- ER by Impressions = engagements / impressions × 100% (always lower than by reach)
- ER by Followers = engagements / followers × 100% (public data, but inflated by non-reaching followers)
ALWAYS specify which variant when reporting or comparing.

Phase 1: Input Validation

Collect per post: likes, comments, shares/retweets, saves (platform-specific), reach or impressions or follower count. **Gate:** Consistent denominator across all posts being compared.

Phase 2: Core Algorithm

1. Sum engagements per post: likes + comments + shares (+ saves, clicks if available) 2. Weight engagements if desired: share=3×, comment=2×, like=1× (shares indicate higher commitment) 3. Divide by chosen denominator (reach preferred, followers as fallback) 4. Compute: per-post ER, average ER across posts, median ER, ER trend over time

Phase 3: Verification

Compare against platform benchmarks. Flag anomalies (ER > 20% likely data error or viral outlier). **Gate:** Results within plausible range for platform.

Phase 4: Output

Return engagement metrics with benchmarking context.

Output Format

{
  "metrics": {"avg_er_by_reach": 3.2, "avg_er_by_followers": 1.8, "median_er": 2.9, "top_post_er": 8.5},
  "benchmark": {"platform": "instagram", "industry": "fashion", "benchmark_er": 2.5, "percentile": 72},
  "metadata": {"posts_analyzed": 30, "period": "2025-Q1", "denominator": "reach"}
}

Examples

Sample I/O

**Input:** Post: 150 likes, 20 comments, 5 shares, reach=5000 **Expected:** ER by reach = (150+20+5)/5000 × 100% = 3.5%

Edge Cases

| Input | Expected | Why | |-------|----------|-----| | Reach = 0 | Undefined, skip post | Can't divide by zero | | Boosted/paid post | Separate from organic | Paid reach inflates denominator, deflates ER | | Viral outlier (10x avg) | Flag, analyze separately | Skews averages |

Gotchas

  • **Platform algorithm changes**: Instagram's algorithm shifts regularly. Historical ER benchmarks become outdated. Use rolling 90-day benchmarks.
  • **Vanity metric trap**: High ER doesn't mean business impact. 1000 likes on a meme ≠ 10 link clicks on a product post. Track meaningful engagements.
  • **Story/Reel metrics differ**: Story engagement (taps, replies) and Reel engagement (plays, shares) need different formulas than feed posts. Don't mix.
  • **Follower-based ER is noisy**: Not all followers see each post (reach < followers). ER by followers underestimates true engagement among those who saw the post.
  • **Comparing across account sizes**: Smaller accounts naturally have higher ER by followers. Normalize or segment by account size for fair comparison.

References

  • For platform-specific benchmark data, see `references/platform-benchmarks.md`
  • For weighted engagement scoring models, see `references/weighted-engagement.md`
Read more
Ships withawesome-agent-skill

Curated skill pack for LLM agents in engineer and science workflow (Cursor & Claude ready).

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on awesome-agent-skill.