brainstorming
The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it takes a one-line idea and drives it to an…
The checkpoint coordinator for /feature. Routed to by /feature once a writing-plans plan exists. Groups tasks into batches, delegates each batch to subagent-driven-development (fresh author agent per task, full review chain, fresh verification), then stops for a human checkpoint
$ npx -y skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill executing-plans --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/executing-plansContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
The checkpoint coordinator for /feature. Routed to by /feature once a writing-plans plan exists. Groups tasks into batches, delegates each batch to subagent-driven-development (fresh author agent per task, full review chain, fresh verification), then stops for a human checkpoint
name: executing-plans description: The checkpoint coordinator for /feature. Routed to by /feature once a writing-plans plan exists. Groups tasks into batches, delegates each batch to subagent-driven-development (fresh author agent per task, full review chain, fresh verification), then stops for a human checkpoint before the next batch. The checkpointed counterpart to /sprint's autonomous run. disable-model-invocation: true
Coordinate the plan in small, user-acknowledged batches. Routed to by `/feature` after `writing-plans` has produced a plan. Each batch is executed by `subagent-driven-development` — fresh author agent per task, spec-compliance review, quality review, fresh verification — and the user checkpoints between batches. The orchestrator never implements; it schedules and checkpoints.
Read these, or STOP and surface the gap — never guess a path, a command, or a task boundary:
Group the plan's tasks into small batches. Keep batches tight — three to five tasks is a ceiling, not a target. Respect the plan's ordering and dependencies: a task never lands before the task it depends on.
**Resume is the normal re-entry.** A task already `ACCEPTED` in the plan's status column was verified before an earlier interruption — exclude it from batching and say so ("resuming: T-01–T-03 already ACCEPTED"). Batch only the non-`ACCEPTED` tasks, starting at the first. Never re-execute an `ACCEPTED` task, and never restart the pipeline at brainstorming because the session died mid-plan.
For each task, confirm the plan names its exact target paths and its verification command. A task missing either is underspecified — return it to `writing-plans`, do not improvise the gap.
Present the batch breakdown to the user as information, not a question: which tasks land in batch 1, and what follows. Do NOT stop for a separate acknowledgment — the user approved the plan in `writing-plans`, and the first Phase 3 checkpoint arrives after batch 1; a breakdown objection surfaces there (or the user interrupts). Each unresolved unknown is a `[CONFIRM-NN]` in `open-questions.md` — surface it, do not guess past it.
Gate: a batch sequence exists and every task has a target path and a verification command. A `[CONFIRM-NN]` that blocks batch 1 is the only reason to stop here.
Invoke `subagent-driven-development` (`{{PLUGIN_ROOT}}/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`) with `scope = [current batch task IDs]`. Pass the plan slug and spec slug so it can read its own pre-flight files. Do not implement anything here — the author agents, review chain, and verification all run inside that skill.
`subagent-driven-development` returns when every task in the scope is `ACCEPTED` (Phase 3–5 green, verification passed on a fresh run). A `tdd` BLOCK, a security CRITICAL finding, or an unresolved `[CONFIRM-NN]` surfaced inside that skill halts the loop — surface it to the user and do not proceed.
Gate: `subagent-driven-development` signals batch complete with all scoped tasks `ACCEPTED`. Any unresolved halt from inside the skill is a gate failure here.
Every task in the batch is done and verified. STOP and checkpoint with the user before any further work:
Do not begin the next batch until the user acknowledges. This gate is the point of `/feature` — the human checkpoint that separates it from `/sprint`'s autonomous run.
Gate: the user has acknowledged the checkpoint. On acknowledgement, loop to Phase 2 for the next batch. When the final batch is acknowledged and the plan is fully verified, route to `commit-gate` — do not commit from here.
When you can't trust yourself with your code base, trust Arbiter.
Repo: arbiterForge/codeArbiter
The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it takes a one-line idea and drives it to an…
The only path to a commit. Routed to when the user invokes /commit or otherwise instructs codeArbiter to persist staged changes. Nine gated phases —…
Optional manual drift audit — report stale provenance-tracked docs (via _provenancelib drift detection across .codearbiter/.provenance/), then per stale doc…
The brownfield back-fill. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md lacks the <!--INITIALIZED--> body marker but source code…
The banned-primitive gate. Routed to when changed code hashes, signs, encrypts, derives keys, generates security-relevant randomness, configures TLS, or…
Investigate-then-decide root-cause analysis for a defect whose cause is unknown (distinct from /fix, which assumes a known bug). Five gated phases: capture,…