/ca-refactor

name: ca-refactor
description: Restructure code with behavioral parity proven through unmodified pre-existing tests, then refactor. No behavior change.
argument-hint: "<surface and motivation>"

$ca-refactor — behavior-preserving restructure

The only permitted entry to refactor work. A refactor that cannot prove parity through unmodified pre-existing tests is a feature change in disguise and routes to `$ca-feature`. Two required parts: the **surface** (exact files, functions, classes, or methods — vague surfaces like "the auth module" are rejected) and the **motivation** (why the restructure is worth doing).

Flow

Routes to the `refactor` skill — six phases:

1. **Surface identification** — lock the exact files, symbols, and public signatures. 2. **Parity coverage proof** — demonstrate pre-existing tests already cover the named surface, with at least one direct test per public method. 3. **Red parity tests (conditional)** — if the refactor exposes a new test seam, route to `tdd` ([routines/tdd/SKILL.md](../../routines/tdd/SKILL.md)) Phase 1 to write failing tests pinning the seam's contract first. 4. **Implementation** — apply the restructure mechanically within the surface table; no new behavior, branches, error paths, or side effects. 5. **Parity verification** — the full pre-existing suite passes with zero edits to any pre-existing test file. 6. **Lint / coverage gate** — lint, type-check, and coverage clear; surface coverage MUST NOT regress.

Routes to

`refactor` ([routines/refactor/SKILL.md](../../routines/refactor/SKILL.md)) — all six phases.

When NOT to use

• New behavior — a new branch, error path, side effect, public method beyond a Phase 3 seam, or a

change to what any input maps to → `$ca-feature`.

• A change motivated by "the current behavior is wrong" → `$ca-fix`.
• Questions or discussion → `$ca-btw`.
• Persisting an already-completed refactor → `$ca-commit`.

Hard gate

No refactor proceeds without behavioral-parity coverage proof in Phase 2; if the surface is under-covered, the skill halts and routes to `tdd` Phase 1 to backfill before resuming. A Phase 4 diff that would classify as `feat`, or a Phase 5 verification that depends on edits to a pre-existing test, terminates the refactor and re-routes to `$ca-feature` or `$ca-fix`.