/comps
Build a comparable company analysis with trading multiples
> /plugin marketplace add anthropics/financial-servicesHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/comps
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Build a comparable company analysis with trading multiples
Command definition
comps.mddescription: Build a comparable company analysis with trading multiples
argument-hint: "[company name or ticker]"
Comparable Company Analysis Command
Build an institutional-grade comparable company analysis with operating metrics, valuation multiples, and statistical benchmarking.
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Company Information
If a company name or ticker is provided, use it. Otherwise ask:
- "What company would you like to analyze?"
Step 2: Load Comps Analysis Skill
Use `skill: "comps-analysis"` to build the analysis:
1. **Clarify the analysis purpose**:
- "What's the key question?" (valuation, efficiency, growth comparison)
- "Who is the audience?" (IC, board, quick reference)
- "Do you have a preferred format or template?"
2. **Identify peer group** (4-6 comparable companies):
- Similar business model
- Similar scale/market cap range
- Same industry/sector
- Geographic comparability
3. **Gather data** (prioritize MCP sources if available):
- Operating metrics: Revenue, Growth, Gross Margin, EBITDA, EBITDA Margin
- Valuation: Market Cap, Enterprise Value, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, P/E
- Additional metrics based on industry (Rule of 40 for SaaS, etc.)
4. **Build the analysis**:
- Operating Statistics section with company data + statistics (Max, 75th, Median, 25th, Min)
- Valuation Multiples section with same statistical summary
- Notes & Methodology documentation
Step 3: Create Excel Output
Generate Excel file with:
- Header block (analysis title, companies, date, units)
- Operating Statistics & Financial Metrics section
- Valuation Multiples section
- Statistical summary for each metric
- Notes section documenting sources and methodology
Step 4: Deliver Output
Provide: 1. **Excel file** (.xlsx) - the comps analysis 2. **Summary** highlighting:
- Peer group selection rationale
- Key insights (who trades at premium/discount)
- Median multiples for reference
Output Format Reference
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [SECTOR] - COMPARABLE COMPANY ANALYSIS │
│ [Company 1] • [Company 2] • [Company 3] • [Company 4] │
│ As of [Date] | All figures in USD Millions │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ OPERATING STATISTICS & FINANCIAL METRICS │
├──────────┬─────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬────────────┤
│ Company │ Revenue │ Growth │ Gross │ EBITDA │ EBITDA │
│ │ (LTM) │ (YoY) │ Margin │ (LTM) │ Margin │
├──────────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────┼─────────┼────────────┤
│ [Data rows for each company] │
│ │
│ Maximum │ =MAX │ =MAX │ =MAX │ =MAX │ =MAX │
│ 75th % │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │
│ Median │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │
│ 25th % │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │
│ Minimum │ =MIN │ =MIN │ =MIN │ =MIN │ =MIN │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ VALUATION MULTIPLES │
├──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬───────────┬────────┤
│ Company │ Mkt Cap │ EV │ EV/Rev │ EV/EBITDA │ P/E │
├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼───────────┼────────┤
│ [Data rows + statistics] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Industry-Specific Metrics
| Industry | Additional Metrics | |----------|-------------------| | Software/SaaS | ARR, Net Dollar Retention, Rule of 40 | | Retail | Same-store sales, Inventory Turns | | Financials | ROE, ROA, Efficiency Ratio | | Manufacturing | Asset Turnover, CapEx/Revenue | | Healthcare | R&D/Revenue, Pipeline Value |
Quality Checklist
Before delivery:
- [ ] 4-6 truly comparable companies
- [ ] Consistent time periods (all LTM or all FY)
- [ ] All formulas reference cells (no hardcoded values)
- [ ] Cell comments on all hardcoded inputs with sources
- [ ] Statistics include Max, 75th, Median, 25th, Min
- [ ] Notes section documents sources and methodology
- [ ] Blue = inputs, Black = formulas
- [ ] Sanity checks pass (margins logical, multiples reasonable)
Read more
description: Build a comparable company analysis with trading multiples argument-hint: "[company name or ticker]"
Comparable Company Analysis Command
Build an institutional-grade comparable company analysis with operating metrics, valuation multiples, and statistical benchmarking.
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Company Information
If a company name or ticker is provided, use it. Otherwise ask:
- "What company would you like to analyze?"
Step 2: Load Comps Analysis Skill
Use `skill: "comps-analysis"` to build the analysis:
1. **Clarify the analysis purpose**:
- "What's the key question?" (valuation, efficiency, growth comparison)
- "Who is the audience?" (IC, board, quick reference)
- "Do you have a preferred format or template?"
2. **Identify peer group** (4-6 comparable companies):
- Similar business model
- Similar scale/market cap range
- Same industry/sector
- Geographic comparability
3. **Gather data** (prioritize MCP sources if available):
- Operating metrics: Revenue, Growth, Gross Margin, EBITDA, EBITDA Margin
- Valuation: Market Cap, Enterprise Value, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, P/E
- Additional metrics based on industry (Rule of 40 for SaaS, etc.)
4. **Build the analysis**:
- Operating Statistics section with company data + statistics (Max, 75th, Median, 25th, Min)
- Valuation Multiples section with same statistical summary
- Notes & Methodology documentation
Step 3: Create Excel Output
Generate Excel file with:
- Header block (analysis title, companies, date, units)
- Operating Statistics & Financial Metrics section
- Valuation Multiples section
- Statistical summary for each metric
- Notes section documenting sources and methodology
Step 4: Deliver Output
Provide: 1. **Excel file** (.xlsx) - the comps analysis 2. **Summary** highlighting:
- Peer group selection rationale
- Key insights (who trades at premium/discount)
- Median multiples for reference
Output Format Reference
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ [SECTOR] - COMPARABLE COMPANY ANALYSIS │ │ [Company 1] • [Company 2] • [Company 3] • [Company 4] │ │ As of [Date] | All figures in USD Millions │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ OPERATING STATISTICS & FINANCIAL METRICS │ ├──────────┬─────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬────────────┤ │ Company │ Revenue │ Growth │ Gross │ EBITDA │ EBITDA │ │ │ (LTM) │ (YoY) │ Margin │ (LTM) │ Margin │ ├──────────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────┼─────────┼────────────┤ │ [Data rows for each company] │ │ │ │ Maximum │ =MAX │ =MAX │ =MAX │ =MAX │ =MAX │ │ 75th % │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ │ Median │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ =MEDIAN │ │ 25th % │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ =QUART │ │ Minimum │ =MIN │ =MIN │ =MIN │ =MIN │ =MIN │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ VALUATION MULTIPLES │ ├──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬───────────┬────────┤ │ Company │ Mkt Cap │ EV │ EV/Rev │ EV/EBITDA │ P/E │ ├──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼───────────┼────────┤ │ [Data rows + statistics] │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Industry-Specific Metrics
| Industry | Additional Metrics | |----------|-------------------| | Software/SaaS | ARR, Net Dollar Retention, Rule of 40 | | Retail | Same-store sales, Inventory Turns | | Financials | ROE, ROA, Efficiency Ratio | | Manufacturing | Asset Turnover, CapEx/Revenue | | Healthcare | R&D/Revenue, Pipeline Value |
Quality Checklist
Before delivery:
- [ ] 4-6 truly comparable companies
- [ ] Consistent time periods (all LTM or all FY)
- [ ] All formulas reference cells (no hardcoded values)
- [ ] Cell comments on all hardcoded inputs with sources
- [ ] Statistics include Max, 75th, Median, 25th, Min
- [ ] Notes section documents sources and methodology
- [ ] Blue = inputs, Black = formulas
- [ ] Sanity checks pass (margins logical, multiples reasonable)
Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for the financial-services workflows we see most — investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management.
Other commands on financial-services.
- /access-policies
Build the access_policies value — the granular, IAM-shaped way to allow or deny add-in features
Open command - /bootstrap
Build the bootstrap endpoint — per-user MCP servers, skills, dynamic config
Open command - /consent
Azure admin consent URLs — one-time tenant approval for Entra SSO and Outlook Graph access
Open command - /debug
Diagnose deployment issues (stale config, connect failures, missing add-in)
Open command - /entra-app
Several manifest configurations require an Entra (Azure AD) app registration in **your** tenant rather than Anthropic's default multi-tenant app — because the token's `aud` must match a resource you control, or because your tenant is in a sovereign cloud where Anthropic's app
Open command - /export-data
Export a copy of a user's add-in chat history, skills, MCP registrations, and settings before a machine is rebuilt
Open command

