ai-inventory
EU AI Act per-system inventory — track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer,…
Structured intake — practice-area templates, cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags, and triage classification. Produces a formatted case summary the student analyzes and the professor reviews. Does NOT decide case acceptance. Use when starting a new client intake, running an
$ npx -y skills add anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill client-intake --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/client-intakeContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Structured intake — practice-area templates, cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags, and triage classification. Produces a formatted case summary the student analyzes and the professor reviews. Does NOT decide case acceptance. Use when starting a new client intake, running an
name: client-intake description: > Structured intake — practice-area templates, cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags, and triage classification. Produces a formatted case summary the student analyzes and the professor reviews. Does NOT decide case acceptance. Use when starting a new client intake, running an intake interview, or writing up a new client's situation. argument-hint: "[optional: practice area hint]"
1. Load `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md` → practice areas, intake templates, supervision style, flag triggers. 2. Use the workflow below. 3. Route to practice-area template. Listen for cross-area issues throughout. 4. Conflict check flags. Triage classification. 5. Output formatted case summary with AI-assisted label, verification prompts, supervision routing.
/legal-clinic:client-intake
---
Intake is one of the biggest bottlenecks in clinics. A student might spend 45 minutes interviewing, another hour writing it up, more time spotting the issues. Meanwhile the waitlist grows.
This skill structures the conversation, produces the write-up, spots issues across practice areas, and flags conflicts — so the student's time goes to analysis, not transcription.
**What it doesn't do:** decide whether to take the case. That's the student's analysis and the professor's judgment. Claude accelerates the information-gathering and structuring, not the lawyering.
`~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md` → practice areas, intake templates (per practice area if multiple), supervision style, jurisdiction, flag triggers.
Check for a practice-area guide at `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/guides/<practice-area>.md`. If one exists, use its intake questions, red flags, and good-fit criteria instead of the generic defaults below. If one doesn't exist, use the generic intake and note at the end of the intake summary: "This was a generic intake — your supervisor can tailor the questions for your clinic type with `/legal-clinic:build-guide`."
When the intake starts before the practice area is routed (Step 1 of the workflow below), re-check for the guide after routing — the guide path depends on which practice area the intake landed in.
Which practice area does this intake start in? The client may not know — they know their problem, not the legal category.
> "Tell me what's going on — what brought you to the clinic today?"
From the answer, route to the appropriate intake template. If the clinic handles multiple areas and the problem spans them (housing client mentions immigration status, family client mentions domestic violence), note all relevant areas — cross-area issue spotting is a feature, not a bug.
Each practice area asks different questions. Use the template from `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md` for this area. Defaults if none provided:
**Immigration:**
**Housing:**
**Family:**
**Consumer:**
While running the practice-area template, listen for issues outside that area:
| Client says | Also flags | |---|---| | "I'm worried about my immigration status" | Immigration issue — even in a housing intake | | "My partner [threatening behavior]" | DV / family law / protective order — even in a consumer intake | | "I can't work because of my injury" | Possible benefits/disability claim | | "They're taking money from my paycheck" | Garnishment — consumer/employment overlap | | "The landlord said he'd call ICE" | Housing + immigration + possible retaliation claim |
Note every cross-area issue in the summary. The clinic may handle it, refer it, or both — that's the professor's call. The student should see it.
Per whatever conflict-check process `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md` describes. At minimum:
Flag for professor review. Don't resolve the conflict — surface it.
Not a case-acceptance decision — a triage input:
| Classification | Means | |---|---| | **Urgent** | Deadline in days, safety issue, irreversible harm imminent | | **Time-sensitive** | Deadline in weeks, harm ongoing but not immediately irreversible | | **Standard** | No immediate deadline, can queue normally | | **May be out of scope** | Issue is outside clinic's practice areas — flag for referral assessment |
Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for the legal workflows we see most — in-house commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, litigation, regulatory, AI governance, IP, and the learning side of the practice (law school clinics and
EU AI Act per-system inventory — track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer,…
Run an AI impact assessment — structured intake, risk analysis, regulatory classification per…
Run the cold-start interview — learns your AI governance practice and writes…
Guided customization of your AI governance practice profile — change one thing without…
Manage matter workspaces — new, list, switch, close, or detach (practice-level).…
Keep the AI policy current with practice — weekly sweep of saved AIAs, triage results, and…