throughput
Use when the user asks to open/show the CCC throughput (token) dashboard, or asks how many tokens they've used — overall/so far,…
Use to check ONE already-written piece of copy against a voice guide before it ships — it spawns ONE fresh sibling session via CCC that scores the existing draft against the stated voice rules, flags every violation with the offending quote and a minimal in-voice rewrite, and
$ npx -y skills add amirfish1/claude-command-center --skill voice-guard --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/voice-guardContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use to check ONE already-written piece of copy against a voice guide before it ships — it spawns ONE fresh sibling session via CCC that scores the existing draft against the stated voice rules, flags every violation with the offending quote and a minimal in-voice rewrite, and
name: voice-guard description: Use to check ONE already-written piece of copy against a voice guide before it ships — it spawns ONE fresh sibling session via CCC that scores the existing draft against the stated voice rules, flags every violation with the offending quote and a minimal in-voice rewrite, and gives a ship / revise verdict. For an artifact that already exists, not a copy competition. allowed-tools: Bash
Voice-guard spawns a single fresh CCC session that holds an existing draft up against an explicit voice guide and reports where it breaks voice. It is a one-artifact audit: you already wrote the README section / landing headline / changelog entry / launch post, and you want an independent read of whether it sounds like it should before it goes out. It builds on the spawn/report_to mechanics in the `ccc-orchestration` skill — read that first for the full Spawn/Inject/Ask API.
**1 spawned session.** Each spawn is a real billed session on the user's kanban — tell the user the count before spawning. For a one-line tweak you can already see the fix on, just fix it — this earns its cost on a paragraph or more, or when the voice guide has enough rules that a human misses some.
CCC_URL="$(cat ~/.claude/command-center/port.txt 2>/dev/null || echo "${CCC_URL:-http://127.0.0.1:8090}")"
curl -sf --max-time 2 "$CCC_URL/api/version" >/dev/null 2>&1 || CCC_URL="http://127.0.0.1:8090"
curl -sf --max-time 2 "$CCC_URL/api/version" >/dev/null 2>&1 || CCC_DOWN=1sandbox blocks loopback and fails spuriously even when CCC is up.
`*.jsonl` under `~/.claude/projects/<slugified-cwd>/` (see `ccc-orchestration`).
The guard is only as good as the guide you hand it. Have both ready:
headline on the landing page" — paste the words).
vibe. Pull them from the repo's style source if one exists (e.g. a CONTRIBUTING voice section, an output-style file, or documented copy rules) rather than inventing them; a made-up guide produces made-up violations. If a rule is a hard ban (e.g. "never use em-dashes", "no exclamation marks"), say so — those become automatic-fail checks.
If you cannot state the voice as checkable rules, **you are not ready** — the result would be one session's taste, which is what `a-b-copy`'s judge already gives you. Get the guide first.
curl -s -X POST "$CCC_URL/api/sessions/spawn" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d @- <<'JSON'
{
"prompt": "Check ONE draft against a voice guide. Do not rewrite it wholesale and do not judge the ideas — only whether it obeys the voice. VOICE GUIDE (the rules; hard bans are automatic-fail): <do/don't rules, with any hard bans marked>. DRAFT: <exact text>. Method: 1) Go rule by rule. For each rule the draft breaks, report a violation row: the rule, the exact offending quote from the draft, why it breaks the rule, and a MINIMAL in-voice rewrite of just that span (change as little as possible — you are correcting voice, not rephrasing the message). 2) Check every hard ban explicitly and report PASS or FAIL for each by name, even the ones that pass. 3) Do not invent violations to look thorough — if a rule is obeyed throughout, say so in one line and move on. Finish with a verdict: SHIP (clean or cosmetic only), REVISE (real voice breaks, listed), or OFF-VOICE (the piece fights the guide throughout and needs a rewrite, not patches). Report the violation list, the hard-ban checklist, and the verdict — nothing gets published, this is advisory.",
"repo_path": "/abs/path/to/repo",
"report_to": "<your-session-id>"
}
JSONOmit `"model"` and `"reasoning_effort"`: the server spawn defaults (Settings → Spawn defaults) apply. Pass either explicitly to keep cost down, with `"engine"` alongside it, since both are validated per engine (see `ccc-orchestration` § 2 for the per-engine effort ladders). CCC appends the return-address footer (`report_to`), so the guard injects its findings back to you when it finishes.
After spawning, **end your turn.** Tell the user a voice check is running and give its session id. The findings arrive by injection (`report_to`) — do **not** poll or sleep-loop. If they never arrive, check `GET /api/sessions/spawned` for whether the child is still alive.
exact span and its in-voice replacement, so you patch rather than rewrite.
save it. Rewrite from the message architecture (that's `a-b-copy` territory if you want competing takes).
**Drafts only** — voice-guard never posts or publishes; applying the fixes and shipping is a human decision.
If the arguments contain `dry-run`, print the exact payload — session count (1), the voice guide rules (with hard bans marked), the draft, and the target repo — and POST nothing.
If `CCC_DOWN=1` or the spawn curl returns connection refused (exit 7), fall back to the built-in `Task` tool subagent with the same rule-by-rule prompt — an independent read of one artifact against a fixed guide does not need kanban visibility to work. Never pretend the CCC spawn ran.
DIFFERENT voices and has a judge pick a winner; its input is a brief and its output is new copy. Voice-
Your coding agents outgrew your terminal. CCC puts every session on one local board and tells you which one needs you. Not affiliated with Anthropic. Start the next while Claude builds the first. A real share card from one of the maintainer's machines.
Use when the user asks to open/show the CCC throughput (token) dashboard, or asks how many tokens they've used — overall/so far,…
Use when you want a marketing-copy A/B — spawns two writer sibling sessions via CCC that draft the SAME message architecture in…
Use when a bug has already survived at least one debugging attempt and you have 2-3 genuinely distinct root-cause hypotheses —…
Spawn, inject into, and ask questions of persistent sibling sessions via Claude Command Center (CCC).
Use to catch documentation that has silently gone stale — it spawns ONE fresh sibling session via CCC that extracts every…
Use for docs QA — it spawns ONE fresh sibling session via CCC that has never seen the feature, has it follow the README /…