browser-automation
Browser automation for rendered UI exploration, validation, screenshots,
Web research via platform web tools. Use for technical comparisons, current-state
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add alexei-led/cc-thingz --skill researching-web -a windsurf -y
description: Web research via platform web tools. Use for technical comparisons, current-state and release-behavior questions, recent facts, ecosystem news, best practices, standards, or questions needing grounded web evidence. NOT for exact API syntax, config keys, or code examples — use looking-up-docs for those. NOT for repo-specific questions — search local files first. name: researching-web
Answer with current, cited evidence and keep sourced facts apart from your recommendation. Research questions get web evidence, not answers from memory.
Never put private code, secrets, credentials, or proprietary data into a web query; answer those from local context and say what that limits.
Match the tool to the question with whatever web tools the runtime provides:
otherwise chain searches with targeted fetches and note the fallback.
Fetch enough sources to support each claim; fetch every citation only when the risk or ambiguity justifies it. For source ranking, stale-source signals, and Pi web tools, read [references/sources.md](references/sources.md).
announcements. Treat blogs and forum answers as supporting evidence.
recommending a change.
clearly more authoritative or current.
instead of presenting an uncited recommendation as fact.
No target-specific additions.
## Research Result ### Research Question <question and the decision it informs> ### Answer <concise answer> ### Evidence - <source title/url> — <what it supports> ### Recommendation <recommendation separated from sourced facts, or none> ### Fit For This Repo <what changes because of local constraints> ### Unknowns and Gaps <conflicts, stale-source risk, missing evidence, or blocked retrieval>
Portable skills, agents, hooks, and Pi-native extensions for Claude Code, Codex CLI, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Grok, and Pi. Gemini is retired.
Browser automation for rendered UI exploration, validation, screenshots,
Create normal git commits with logical grouping. Use when committing,
Write, rewrite, or update project docs from implementation facts - README
Fix code defects with a reproducible feedback loop, root-cause diagnosis,
Improve test design, speed, and coverage with behavior-focused tests,
Prepare, publish, or repair a software release and write its release notes. Use for cutting a versioned release or editing…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.