charter
Establish or amend the project constitution — the standing principles and constraints that bind every SPARK phase. Use once at project start to give the team…
Start the Specify phase of the SPARK loop: the Product Owner interrogates a product idea and turns it into a spec with user stories and testable acceptance criteria. Use when the user brings a new feature idea, product idea or change request that has no spec yet — or wants an
$ npx -y skills add a-lottes/aSPARK --skill story-time --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/story-timeContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Start the Specify phase of the SPARK loop: the Product Owner interrogates a product idea and turns it into a spec with user stories and testable acceptance criteria. Use when the user brings a new feature idea, product idea or change request that has no spec yet — or wants an
name: story-time description: > Start the Specify phase of the SPARK loop: the Product Owner interrogates a product idea and turns it into a spec with user stories and testable acceptance criteria. Use when the user brings a new feature idea, product idea or change request that has no spec yet — or wants an existing spec challenged and reworked.
You are running the **Specify** ceremony. The Product Owner challenges the idea; the outcome is a spec — or the insight that the idea shouldn't be built.
The user's feature idea, usually passed as the command argument. If no idea was provided, ask for it before doing anything else.
1. **Name the feature.** Derive a short kebab-case feature name from the idea (e.g. `weekly-stats-dashboard`). If `.spark/<feature-name>/` already exists, ask the user whether to rework that spec or pick a new name. 2. **Resolve active lenses.** The constitution is the single source of truth. If `.spark/constitution.md` has a *Project Profile & Active Lenses* section, take the active lenses from it and pass their paths in step 3. If there's **no constitution**, do **not** resolve or apply lenses for this run — only give a lightweight **nudge**: glance at the repo (signals in `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/lenses/README.md`), name the likely type(s) in one line (e.g. "this looks like a public `website` — an `seo` lens would apply"), and point the user to `/charter` to record the profile so the lens activates for every phase. No lens is applied off a fallback guess; nothing is switched on without a constitution entry the user confirmed. 3. **Delegate to the Product Owner.** Invoke the `product-owner` agent with: the user's idea verbatim, the feature name, the path `.spark/<feature-name>/spec.md`, and the spec template from `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/spec.md`. Point it at `.spark/constitution.md` if that file exists — the spec must live within it. Pass the paths of any active lenses (`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/lenses/<name>.md`) so the PO captures their concerns as measurable NFRs. 4. **Relay, don't guess.** If the agent returns open questions instead of a spec, put them to the user (use AskUserQuestion where the options are enumerable), then re-invoke the agent with the answers. Repeat until the spec is drafted. 5. **Run the Clarify pass.** Once a draft exists, have the PO scan it for ambiguity against its taxonomy (functional boundaries, data, permissions, error/edge cases, NFRs, integrations, UX states, out-of-scope). Put the returned clarification questions to the user — AskUserQuestion for enumerable choices — and re-invoke the agent to fold each answer into the right section and log it in the spec's *Clarifications* table. Repeat until no high-impact ambiguity is left unresolved or unparked. Don't skip this because the draft "looks complete" — that's exactly when a whole category is silently missing. 6. **Present the result.** Show the user: the sharpened problem statement, the story list with MoSCoW priorities, the non-functional requirements, the named risks/assumptions, what was clarified, and what was cut to Out of Scope. If the PO recommends *not* building the feature, lead with that recommendation and its reasons. 7. **Iterate.** Fold the user's feedback back into the spec via the agent until the user is satisfied. 8. **Walk the gate.** Go through the SPEC GATE checklist at the bottom of the spec together with the user:
— the gate stays open. Set status `draft` and hand off to `/look-and-feel`.
on their explicit yes: set status `approved` and check the gate boxes that are genuinely true.
conversation.
for `/sprint-plan`.
a documented decision.
A gated agile delivery process for Claude Code: an AI product team (PO, Designer, EM, Reviewer, QA, Release) where every feature must pass a quality gate before it moves on — including real-browser QA.
Repo: a-lottes/aSPARK
Establish or amend the project constitution — the standing principles and constraints that bind every SPARK phase. Use once at project start to give the team…
Hands-on QA in a real browser: the QA Tester clicks through the running app, verifies every acceptance criterion from the spec, explores beyond the happy path…
Start the Keep phase of the SPARK loop: the Release Manager runs fresh pre-flight checks, writes the user-facing changelog, prepares tag/PR/ deploy, publishes…
Start the Act phase of the SPARK loop: build the increment strictly following the approved plan, task by task, with progress tracked in the plan. Use after the…
Run the Designer over a spec (design risks, usability heuristics, accessibility) or over an implemented UI (screenshots, running app). Use after /story-time…
Have the Product Owner survey the project's current state — shipped features, in-flight work, open findings, standing goals — and propose one concrete next…