explorer
Quick codebase explorer for beast. Maps project structure, tech stack, test infrastructure, and key patterns.
An agent is a specialist Claude hands a whole job to, with its own tools and its own context.
1,445 agents across 643 plugins.
Quick codebase explorer for beast. Maps project structure, tech stack, test infrastructure, and key patterns.
Backend architecture specialist. Microservices, APIs, databases.
Frontend architecture specialist. React, Vue, Angular, Next.js.
Data architecture specialist. Databases, ETL, analytics.
Use project form components instead of native elements in all `.tsx` files. Native form elements bypass GAIA's Conform integration and accessible error/label…
- Single `useTranslation()` call per component, flag multiple `useTranslation` calls in the same component - Namespace override via `{ns: 'other'}` as the…
- Import only from `tailwind-merge`, flag any use of `clsx`, `classnames`, or `cn` wrappers for class merging - `twJoin` when no class conflict is possible…
Detect performance regressions in changed code — N+1 queries, unnecessary recomputes, missing memoization, big-O regressions, memory leaks, bundle-size red…
Review test code in the diff — assertion quality, branch coverage of new code, mock realism, brittle patterns. Distinct from "spec existence" check.
Detect breaking changes to public APIs, exported types, schemas, REST routes, and DB migrations. Flags consumer-impacting changes that need coordination.
Integration testing gap reviewer that surveys existing integration coverage, identifies trust boundaries and seams, and recommends gaps or starter strategies.…
Mutation testing worker that applies code mutations one at a time and reports which tests catch them
Test quality reviewer that identifies brittle, tautological, and harmful tests. Reports redundant tests as informational only.
Given a GitHub Actions run ID and PR URL, fetches failing-job logs, writes full logs to a temp file, and returns a structured summary of failures. Invoked by…
Review a pushed pull request with fresh eyes in an isolated worktree, never editing the code under review. A peer's PR gets curated comments; my own gets a…
Manages GitHub repository rulesets. Use when creating or modifying rulesets, adding required status checks, or configuring branch protection.
- [When] 버그 리포트가 있거나 예상과 다른 동작이 발견되었을 때 - [Input] 버그 설명, 재현 경로, 에러 로그
Multi-agent orchestrator for complete full-stack feature development
Production incident response and crisis management expert
Routes QA tickets to the right agents in the right order — including environment setup and live browser validation
Analyzes a multi-repo release diff to map cross-repo impact, AC compliance, and deployment risks
Maps code changes to existing tests — finds which tests to run, which may break, and where coverage gaps exist
Use this agent when you need to create, update, or edit artefacts — documents, guides, specifications, skills, or any content that should meet quality…
Use this agent when the user needs comprehensive research on a topic, question, or domain — gathering information, synthesising findings, and producing…
Reviews implementation against enriched roadmap chunk, architecture, and code quality standards. Applies perspective references loaded by orchestrator.…
Documentation and reference researcher. Fetches official docs, verifies technical information, and summarizes findings. READ-ONLY.
Code quality and spec compliance reviewer. Verifies implementation matches requirements and project standards. Read-only for source files; Bash restricted to…
Adversarial test engineer. Writes tests that are genuinely hard to pass. Thinks like an attacker hunting for weak implementations. Use before implementation to…
Stage 1 peer code reviewer focused on Python idioms, PEP 8, and type hints.
Stage 1 peer reviewer focused on test coverage, edge cases, and missing assertions.
Stage 1 peer reviewer focused on naming, structure, comment quality, and function size.
Peer Reviewer 2; assesses domain expertise, substantive accuracy, and field-specific adequacy
Writes the full paper draft section by section from the structured outline and Paper Configuration Record
Q1 journal editorial review; delivers Accept/Reject verdict with actionable feedback on research reports
**Note: The current year is 2026.** Use this when interpreting commit dates and recent changes.
© 2026 Flowy · Free and open source
Built for Claude Code · Not affiliated with Anthropic