/challenge-operation
Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices (de Bono Challenge)
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill challenge-operation --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/challenge-operation
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices (de Bono Challenge)
SKILL.md
challenge-operation.SKILL.mdname: challenge-operation
description: Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices (de Bono Challenge)
execution: strategy
dependencies:
sops:
- alternatives-generation
- challenge-questioning
- escape-technique
- lateral-synthesis
tactics:
- concept-hierarchy
Challenge Operation
Apply de Bono's Challenge technique: non-threatening questioning of why things are done the way they are. Not criticism — genuine curiosity about whether current approaches are the only way.
State Ledger
| Resource | Target | Current | % | |----------|--------|---------|---| | web-search | 20 | 0 | 0% | | web-research | 8 | 0 | 0% | | paper-overview | 20 | 0 | 0% | | paper-search | 12 | 0 | 0% | | paper-research | 5 | 0 | 0% |
HARD-GATE
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
Available Tactics
| Tactic | Role | |--------|------| | concept-hierarchy | Organize challenged practices into concept levels |
Available SOPs
| SOP | Role | |-----|------| | challenge-questioning | Apply non-threatening 'Why?' to current practices | | escape-technique | Escape from dominant patterns revealed by challenge | | alternatives-generation | Generate alternatives to challenged practices | | lateral-synthesis | Synthesize challenge operation outputs |
Execution Guidance
1. **List practices**: Identify current practices, methods, and assumptions 2. **Challenge each**: Apply challenge-questioning SOP — "Why is it done this way?" 3. **Distinguish**: Separate necessary constraints from historical accidents 4. **Escape**: For historical accidents, use escape-technique to find alternatives 5. **Generate alternatives**: Produce concrete alternatives to challenged practices 6. **Synthesize**: Produce structured output via lateral-synthesis
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | concept-hierarchy | Build concept levels from purpose through concepts to ideas, with escape and fractionation at each level. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | alternatives-generation | Generate alternatives for every known approach — ensure no approach goes unchallenged. | | challenge-questioning | Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices to reveal historical accidents vs. genuine constraints. | | escape-technique | Identify dominant thinking pattern and escape it via deliberate pattern-breaking. | | lateral-synthesis | Synthesize all lateral thinking intermediate outputs into a structured idea report. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Read more
name: challenge-operation description: Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices (de Bono Challenge) execution: strategy dependencies: sops: - alternatives-generation - challenge-questioning - escape-technique - lateral-synthesis tactics: - concept-hierarchy
Challenge Operation
Apply de Bono's Challenge technique: non-threatening questioning of why things are done the way they are. Not criticism — genuine curiosity about whether current approaches are the only way.
State Ledger
| Resource | Target | Current | % | |----------|--------|---------|---| | web-search | 20 | 0 | 0% | | web-research | 8 | 0 | 0% | | paper-overview | 20 | 0 | 0% | | paper-search | 12 | 0 | 0% | | paper-research | 5 | 0 | 0% |
HARD-GATE
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
Available Tactics
| Tactic | Role | |--------|------| | concept-hierarchy | Organize challenged practices into concept levels |
Available SOPs
| SOP | Role | |-----|------| | challenge-questioning | Apply non-threatening 'Why?' to current practices | | escape-technique | Escape from dominant patterns revealed by challenge | | alternatives-generation | Generate alternatives to challenged practices | | lateral-synthesis | Synthesize challenge operation outputs |
Execution Guidance
1. **List practices**: Identify current practices, methods, and assumptions 2. **Challenge each**: Apply challenge-questioning SOP — "Why is it done this way?" 3. **Distinguish**: Separate necessary constraints from historical accidents 4. **Escape**: For historical accidents, use escape-technique to find alternatives 5. **Generate alternatives**: Produce concrete alternatives to challenged practices 6. **Synthesize**: Produce structured output via lateral-synthesis
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | concept-hierarchy | Build concept levels from purpose through concepts to ideas, with escape and fractionation at each level. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | alternatives-generation | Generate alternatives for every known approach — ensure no approach goes unchallenged. | | challenge-questioning | Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices to reveal historical accidents vs. genuine constraints. | | escape-technique | Identify dominant thinking pattern and escape it via deliberate pattern-breaking. | | lateral-synthesis | Synthesize all lateral thinking intermediate outputs into a structured idea report. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Other skills on de-anthropocentric-research-engine.
- /formated-results
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced block in your reply. Do not execute the research.
Open skill - /formated-specs
Spec-slot skill for the research-executor. Emit the 4-layer DARE orchestration of the assigned topic as one research-graph JSON fenced block in your reply. Replaces the generic spec-writing step.
Open skill - /injection-fidelity
Loss-1 judge (codex role). Given one sample's de-identified dialogue and its PolicyCard, decide axis-by-axis whether the user-simulator enacted the card's per-axis pressure. Judge enactment of the card, never whether the research is good.
Open skill - /ladder-quality-order
Loss-2 judge (codex role). Over one topic's 6 shuffled research-design samples, pairwise-rank by quality using the D1–D5 standard. Emit the pairwise log; the harness computes the order and the ladder verdicts. Judge quality difference, never against academic standards.
Open skill - /optimization-loop
The optimizer brain for the ladder-foundry pretraining loop. Runs the two-level nested batch loop, delegates gating to gate_eval, attributes a failing batch to one weight (attribute-first), and recovers from disk after compaction. Control flow is fully scripted; only the
Open skill - /acu-nugget-recall
Tactic: Extract atomic units from one paper and score how much of a caller-supplied summary covers. Use for ACU-style binary or Nugget-style ternary recall checks; cannot run without a target summary.
Open skill

