formated-results
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced…
Tactic: Extract causal claims, evaluate probability of necessity (PN)
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill causal-necessity-testing --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/causal-necessity-testingContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Tactic: Extract causal claims, evaluate probability of necessity (PN)
name: causal-necessity-testing description: 'Tactic: Extract causal claims, evaluate probability of necessity (PN) and sufficiency (PS) for each, classify into necessity-sufficiency quadrants.' type: tactic strategies: - necessity-sufficiency - structural-counterfactual - thought-experiment dependencies: sops: - causal-claim-extraction - load-bearing-identification - necessity-evaluation - sufficiency-evaluation
PNS evaluation: for each causal claim, determine whether the cause is necessary, sufficient, both, or neither.
1. **causal-claim-extraction** extracts all X→Y causal claims from the artifact 2. **necessity-evaluation** asks: if X had NOT occurred, would Y still hold? (PN) 3. **sufficiency-evaluation** asks: if X occurred in isolation, would Y follow? (PS) 4. Classify each claim into quadrant:
5. **load-bearing-identification** synthesizes quadrant assignments
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | causal-claim-extraction | Extract all causal claims (X causes Y, X leads to Y, X enables Y) from an artifact, producing a structured list of cause-effect pairs. | | load-bearing-identification | Identify which factors are "load-bearing walls" — factors whose removal would collapse the conclusion. | | necessity-evaluation | Evaluate the probability of necessity (PN) for a causal factor — would the conclusion fail if this factor were absent? | | sufficiency-evaluation | Evaluate the probability of sufficiency (PS) for a causal factor — would this factor alone be enough to produce the conclusion? |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced…
Spec-slot skill for the research-executor. Emit the 4-layer DARE orchestration of the assigned topic as one research-graph JSON fenced block in your reply.…
Loss-1 judge (codex role). Given one sample's de-identified dialogue and its PolicyCard, decide axis-by-axis whether the user-simulator enacted the card's…
Loss-2 judge (codex role). Over one topic's 6 shuffled research-design samples, pairwise-rank by quality using the D1–D5 standard. Emit the pairwise log; the…
The optimizer brain for the ladder-foundry pretraining loop. Runs the two-level nested batch loop, delegates gating to gate_eval, attributes a failing batch to…
Tactic: Extract atomic units from one paper and score how much of a caller-supplied summary covers. Use for ACU-style binary or Nugget-style ternary recall…