/argument-mapping
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence,
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill argument-mapping --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/argument-mapping
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence,
SKILL.md
argument-mapping.SKILL.mdname: argument-mapping
description: Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence,
assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
execution: campaign
dependencies:
strategies:
- argument-synthesis
- claim-extraction
- evidence-linking-arg
tactics:
- knowledge-compilation
sops:
- context-checkpoint
- context-init
Argument Mapping
Map argument structures for research domains. Extracts claims from sources, links supporting and opposing evidence, assesses argument strength, and synthesizes coherent positions from complex debates.
Manifest
| Level | Count | Skills | |-------|-------|--------| | Strategy | 3 | claim-extraction, evidence-linking-arg, argument-synthesis | | Tactic | 2 | claim-decomposition, strength-assessment | | SOP | 6 | claim-page-creation, rebuttal-documentation, evidence-attachment, strength-scoring, argument-visualization, synthesis-report |
Budget Table
| Metric | Small | Medium | Large | |--------|-------|--------|-------| | Claims extracted | 10 | 25 | 50 | | Evidence links created | 15 | 40 | 80 | | Rebuttals documented | 3 | 10 | 20 | | Strength scores assigned | 10 | 25 | 50 | | Synthesis reports | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Strategy Sequence (Reference, Not Prescription)
1. **claim-extraction** — identify and extract claims from source material 2. **evidence-linking-arg** — link evidence to claims (supporting, contradicting, qualifying) 3. **argument-synthesis** — synthesize positions from the argument graph
MCP Tools Used
- `vault_search` — find existing claims and evidence
- `vault_add_edge` — create argument edges (supported_by, contradicts, derived_from)
- `vault_query_graph` — trace argument chains
- `vault_graph_stats` — assess argument coverage
- `vault_lint` — validate structural integrity
Context-Management
<HARD-GATE>
- Call `context-init` at campaign start
- Call `context-checkpoint` after each strategy completes
- Call `knowledge-compilation` after each strategy
</HARD-GATE>
Guiding Principles
- **Claims are atomic.** Each claim page states exactly one proposition. Compound claims must be decomposed.
- **Evidence is typed.** Every evidence link specifies its relationship: supports, contradicts, qualifies, or is irrelevant.
- **Strength is earned.** A claim's strength comes from the weight and diversity of its evidence, not from authority or repetition.
- **Steel-man first.** Before documenting rebuttals, ensure the strongest version of each claim is represented.
- **Synthesis is not averaging.** The synthesis report identifies which claims survive scrutiny, not a compromise between all positions.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available Strategies
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Strategy | When to use | | --- | --- | | argument-synthesis | Strategy for synthesizing argument positions — aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, produce synthesis reports identifying which claims survive scrutiny. | | claim-extraction | Strategy for extracting claims from source material — identify propositions, decompose compound claims, classify claim types, create claim pages in the vault. | | evidence-linking-arg | Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential coverage. |
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | knowledge-compilation | Tactic for compiling research findings into vault pages — orchestrates page creation, updates, edge linking, and index maintenance. Minimum yield ≥3 page operations per invocation. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | context-checkpoint | Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Covers both process and results with genuine substance. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a research Phase. | | context-init | Create a new context file for a research Phase. Called once at Phase start to initialize the file that subsequent context-checkpoint calls will append to. Use this skill whenever a new research Phase begins and a fresh context file is needed. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Read more
name: argument-mapping description: Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault. execution: campaign dependencies: strategies: - argument-synthesis - claim-extraction - evidence-linking-arg tactics: - knowledge-compilation sops: - context-checkpoint - context-init
Argument Mapping
Map argument structures for research domains. Extracts claims from sources, links supporting and opposing evidence, assesses argument strength, and synthesizes coherent positions from complex debates.
Manifest
| Level | Count | Skills | |-------|-------|--------| | Strategy | 3 | claim-extraction, evidence-linking-arg, argument-synthesis | | Tactic | 2 | claim-decomposition, strength-assessment | | SOP | 6 | claim-page-creation, rebuttal-documentation, evidence-attachment, strength-scoring, argument-visualization, synthesis-report |
Budget Table
| Metric | Small | Medium | Large | |--------|-------|--------|-------| | Claims extracted | 10 | 25 | 50 | | Evidence links created | 15 | 40 | 80 | | Rebuttals documented | 3 | 10 | 20 | | Strength scores assigned | 10 | 25 | 50 | | Synthesis reports | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Strategy Sequence (Reference, Not Prescription)
1. **claim-extraction** — identify and extract claims from source material 2. **evidence-linking-arg** — link evidence to claims (supporting, contradicting, qualifying) 3. **argument-synthesis** — synthesize positions from the argument graph
MCP Tools Used
- `vault_search` — find existing claims and evidence
- `vault_add_edge` — create argument edges (supported_by, contradicts, derived_from)
- `vault_query_graph` — trace argument chains
- `vault_graph_stats` — assess argument coverage
- `vault_lint` — validate structural integrity
Context-Management
<HARD-GATE>
- Call `context-init` at campaign start
- Call `context-checkpoint` after each strategy completes
- Call `knowledge-compilation` after each strategy
</HARD-GATE>
Guiding Principles
- **Claims are atomic.** Each claim page states exactly one proposition. Compound claims must be decomposed.
- **Evidence is typed.** Every evidence link specifies its relationship: supports, contradicts, qualifies, or is irrelevant.
- **Strength is earned.** A claim's strength comes from the weight and diversity of its evidence, not from authority or repetition.
- **Steel-man first.** Before documenting rebuttals, ensure the strongest version of each claim is represented.
- **Synthesis is not averaging.** The synthesis report identifies which claims survive scrutiny, not a compromise between all positions.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available Strategies
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Strategy | When to use | | --- | --- | | argument-synthesis | Strategy for synthesizing argument positions — aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, produce synthesis reports identifying which claims survive scrutiny. | | claim-extraction | Strategy for extracting claims from source material — identify propositions, decompose compound claims, classify claim types, create claim pages in the vault. | | evidence-linking-arg | Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential coverage. |
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | knowledge-compilation | Tactic for compiling research findings into vault pages — orchestrates page creation, updates, edge linking, and index maintenance. Minimum yield ≥3 page operations per invocation. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | context-checkpoint | Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Covers both process and results with genuine substance. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a research Phase. | | context-init | Create a new context file for a research Phase. Called once at Phase start to initialize the file that subsequent context-checkpoint calls will append to. Use this skill whenever a new research Phase begins and a fresh context file is needed. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Other skills on de-anthropocentric-research-engine.
- /formated-results
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced block in your reply. Do not execute the research.
Open skill - /formated-specs
Spec-slot skill for the research-executor. Emit the 4-layer DARE orchestration of the assigned topic as one research-graph JSON fenced block in your reply. Replaces the generic spec-writing step.
Open skill - /injection-fidelity
Loss-1 judge (codex role). Given one sample's de-identified dialogue and its PolicyCard, decide axis-by-axis whether the user-simulator enacted the card's per-axis pressure. Judge enactment of the card, never whether the research is good.
Open skill - /ladder-quality-order
Loss-2 judge (codex role). Over one topic's 6 shuffled research-design samples, pairwise-rank by quality using the D1–D5 standard. Emit the pairwise log; the harness computes the order and the ladder verdicts. Judge quality difference, never against academic standards.
Open skill - /optimization-loop
The optimizer brain for the ladder-foundry pretraining loop. Runs the two-level nested batch loop, delegates gating to gate_eval, attributes a failing batch to one weight (attribute-first), and recovers from disk after compaction. Control flow is fully scripted; only the
Open skill - /acu-nugget-recall
Tactic: Extract atomic units from one paper and score how much of a caller-supplied summary covers. Use for ACU-style binary or Nugget-style ternary recall checks; cannot run without a target summary.
Open skill

