formated-results
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced…
Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill anti-benchmark --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/anti-benchmarkContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks
name: anti-benchmark description: Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks to reveal unexamined constraints. execution: strategy dependencies: tactics: - creative-ideation-assumption-enumeration sops: - benchmark-challenge - constructive-rebellion - creative-ideation-assumption-perturbation - destruction-synthesis - sacred-cow-identification
Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions.
| Resource | Target | Current | % | |----------|--------|---------|---| | web-search | 25 | 0 | 0% | | web-research | 10 | 0 | 0% | | paper-overview | 25 | 0 | 0% | | paper-search | 15 | 0 | 0% | | paper-research | 5 | 0 | 0% |
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
| Tactic | Role | |--------|------| | assumption-enumeration | Surface assumptions hidden in benchmarks |
| SOP | Role | |-----|------| | benchmark-challenge | Identify and negate benchmark assumptions | | sacred-cow-identification | Find unquestioned beliefs behind best practices | | assumption-perturbation | Test what happens when benchmark assumptions fail | | constructive-rebellion | Build alternatives that violate benchmarks constructively | | destruction-synthesis | Synthesize anti-benchmark outputs |
1. **Identify benchmarks**: Catalog the industry best practices and standards in the domain 2. **Deconstruct**: Use benchmark-challenge to expose hidden assumptions in each 3. **Surface sacred cows**: Use sacred-cow-identification for deeper unquestioned beliefs 4. **Perturb**: Use assumption-perturbation to test "what if this standard is wrong?" 5. **Research alternatives**: Search for domains that succeed WITHOUT these benchmarks 6. **Build**: Use constructive-rebellion to form solutions that violate conventions productively 7. **Synthesize**: Produce structured output via destruction-synthesis
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | creative-ideation-assumption-enumeration | Surface, perturb, and prioritize assumptions by disruption potential. Orchestrates assumption surfacing → perturbation → sacred cow identification → prioritization. |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | benchmark-challenge | Identify and negate benchmark assumptions. Deconstruct best practices to reveal hidden constraints and open new spaces. | | constructive-rebellion | Build constructive alternatives from destructive negation. Transform violated assumptions into viable innovation directions. | | creative-ideation-assumption-perturbation | Perturb each assumption, observe system response. Systematic stress-testing of assumptions to reveal fragility and opportunity. | | destruction-synthesis | Synthesize all assumption destruction outputs into structured destructive innovation report. | | sacred-cow-identification | Find domain's unquestioned beliefs. Systematic identification of dogma that constrains innovation. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced…
Spec-slot skill for the research-executor. Emit the 4-layer DARE orchestration of the assigned topic as one research-graph JSON fenced block in your reply.…
Loss-1 judge (codex role). Given one sample's de-identified dialogue and its PolicyCard, decide axis-by-axis whether the user-simulator enacted the card's…
Loss-2 judge (codex role). Over one topic's 6 shuffled research-design samples, pairwise-rank by quality using the D1–D5 standard. Emit the pairwise log; the…
The optimizer brain for the ladder-foundry pretraining loop. Runs the two-level nested batch loop, delegates gating to gate_eval, attributes a failing batch to…
Tactic: Extract atomic units from one paper and score how much of a caller-supplied summary covers. Use for ACU-style binary or Nugget-style ternary recall…