formated-results
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced…
Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill actor-profiling --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/actor-profilingContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and
name: actor-profiling description: Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and deep motivations. Produces an ActorProfile that informs all downstream decisions. Use this tactic at the start of any crystallization process to build a model of the user's capabilities, limitations, and intent. dependencies: sops: - ask-constraints - ask-intentionality - clarify-resources - explore-resume
Build a comprehensive model of the user as a research actor — who they are, what they have, what constrains them, and why they're doing this.
| SOP | Purpose | Execution | |-----|---------|-----------| | explore-resume | Background, skills, projects, publications, research experience | dialogue (once only) | | clarify-resources | Compute, timeline, collaboration, data, environment | dialogue | | ask-constraints | Venue targets, methodology preferences, avoidance areas, advisor requirements | dialogue | | ask-intentionality | Deep WHY probing — motivation, risk tolerance, innovation preference, etc. | dialogue |
The goal is to construct an ActorProfile with enough information to inform field exploration and goal decomposition. How you get there is your decision.
**Typical flow:** 1. `explore-resume` first (one-time, never re-run) 2. `clarify-resources` → `ask-constraints` → `ask-intentionality`
**But you may:**
**End condition:** You judge that you have enough information to construct a meaningful ActorProfile. In cold-start scenarios, "enough" may mean just establishing boundaries (what the user won't do) rather than specifics.
When the user doesn't know what they want or can do, the ActorProfile captures boundaries rather than commitments:
This is sufficient — later tactics will help narrow within these boundaries.
After running the SOPs you deem necessary, synthesize an ActorProfile:
ActorProfile {
background: { skills, projects, publications, researchExp }
resources: { compute, timeline, collaboration, data, environment }
constraints: { venue, methodology, avoidance, advisor }
intentionality: {
motivation, successDefinition,
riskTolerance, innovationPreference,
independencePreference, timeUrgency, learningWillingness
}
boundary: "..." // what the user definitely won't do
}This is a conceptual schema, not a JSON requirement. Express it in whatever format serves the downstream context best.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | ask-constraints | Understand hard boundaries on the user's research — target venues, methodology preferences, areas to avoid, advisor/team requirements. Not limited to ML/AI — works for any research domain. | | ask-intentionality | Deep WHY probing inspired by i* Intentionality modeling. Understand the user's motivation, success definition, risk tolerance, innovation preference, independence preference, time urgency, and learning willingness. The most important SOP in actor-profiling — understanding WHY drives everything downstream. | | clarify-resources | Understand what resources the user has available for research — compute, timeline, collaboration, data access, experimental environment. Every item accepts 'TBD' as a valid answer. | | explore-resume | Understand the user's background comprehensively — technical stack, project experience, research experience, publications, research directions. Allows user to express interest beyond their resume. Execute once only, never re-run. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced…
Spec-slot skill for the research-executor. Emit the 4-layer DARE orchestration of the assigned topic as one research-graph JSON fenced block in your reply.…
Loss-1 judge (codex role). Given one sample's de-identified dialogue and its PolicyCard, decide axis-by-axis whether the user-simulator enacted the card's…
Loss-2 judge (codex role). Over one topic's 6 shuffled research-design samples, pairwise-rank by quality using the D1–D5 standard. Emit the pairwise log; the…
The optimizer brain for the ladder-foundry pretraining loop. Runs the two-level nested batch loop, delegates gating to gate_eval, attributes a failing batch to…
Tactic: Extract atomic units from one paper and score how much of a caller-supplied summary covers. Use for ACU-style binary or Nugget-style ternary recall…