/actor-profiling
Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill actor-profiling --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/actor-profiling
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and
SKILL.md
actor-profiling.SKILL.mdname: actor-profiling
description: Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and
deep motivations. Produces an ActorProfile that informs all downstream decisions.
Use this tactic at the start of any crystallization process to build a model of
the user's capabilities, limitations, and intent.
dependencies:
sops:
- ask-constraints
- ask-intentionality
- clarify-resources
- explore-resume
Actor Profiling
Build a comprehensive model of the user as a research actor — who they are, what they have, what constrains them, and why they're doing this.
Available SOPs
| SOP | Purpose | Execution | |-----|---------|-----------| | explore-resume | Background, skills, projects, publications, research experience | dialogue (once only) | | clarify-resources | Compute, timeline, collaboration, data, environment | dialogue | | ask-constraints | Venue targets, methodology preferences, avoidance areas, advisor requirements | dialogue | | ask-intentionality | Deep WHY probing — motivation, risk tolerance, innovation preference, etc. | dialogue |
Methodology Guidance
The goal is to construct an ActorProfile with enough information to inform field exploration and goal decomposition. How you get there is your decision.
**Typical flow:** 1. `explore-resume` first (one-time, never re-run) 2. `clarify-resources` → `ask-constraints` → `ask-intentionality`
**But you may:**
- Return to `ask-intentionality` at any point when you discover a deeper WHY to probe
- Interleave `clarify-resources` when intentionality probing reveals resource-related gaps
- Skip or abbreviate SOPs when the user's initial message already provides the information
**End condition:** You judge that you have enough information to construct a meaningful ActorProfile. In cold-start scenarios, "enough" may mean just establishing boundaries (what the user won't do) rather than specifics.
Cold-Start Special Case
When the user doesn't know what they want or can do, the ActorProfile captures boundaries rather than commitments:
- "User has experience in NLP and GNN, won't jump to physics/chemistry"
- "Timeline is flexible, no hard deadline"
- "Motivated by interest, not graduation pressure"
This is sufficient — later tactics will help narrow within these boundaries.
Output (Tactic-Level Aggregation)
After running the SOPs you deem necessary, synthesize an ActorProfile:
ActorProfile {
background: { skills, projects, publications, researchExp }
resources: { compute, timeline, collaboration, data, environment }
constraints: { venue, methodology, avoidance, advisor }
intentionality: {
motivation, successDefinition,
riskTolerance, innovationPreference,
independencePreference, timeUrgency, learningWillingness
}
boundary: "..." // what the user definitely won't do
}This is a conceptual schema, not a JSON requirement. Express it in whatever format serves the downstream context best.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | ask-constraints | Understand hard boundaries on the user's research — target venues, methodology preferences, areas to avoid, advisor/team requirements. Not limited to ML/AI — works for any research domain. | | ask-intentionality | Deep WHY probing inspired by i* Intentionality modeling. Understand the user's motivation, success definition, risk tolerance, innovation preference, independence preference, time urgency, and learning willingness. The most important SOP in actor-profiling — understanding WHY drives everything downstream. | | clarify-resources | Understand what resources the user has available for research — compute, timeline, collaboration, data access, experimental environment. Every item accepts 'TBD' as a valid answer. | | explore-resume | Understand the user's background comprehensively — technical stack, project experience, research experience, publications, research directions. Allows user to express interest beyond their resume. Execute once only, never re-run. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Read more
name: actor-profiling description: Understand who the user is — background, resources, constraints, and deep motivations. Produces an ActorProfile that informs all downstream decisions. Use this tactic at the start of any crystallization process to build a model of the user's capabilities, limitations, and intent. dependencies: sops: - ask-constraints - ask-intentionality - clarify-resources - explore-resume
Actor Profiling
Build a comprehensive model of the user as a research actor — who they are, what they have, what constrains them, and why they're doing this.
Available SOPs
| SOP | Purpose | Execution | |-----|---------|-----------| | explore-resume | Background, skills, projects, publications, research experience | dialogue (once only) | | clarify-resources | Compute, timeline, collaboration, data, environment | dialogue | | ask-constraints | Venue targets, methodology preferences, avoidance areas, advisor requirements | dialogue | | ask-intentionality | Deep WHY probing — motivation, risk tolerance, innovation preference, etc. | dialogue |
Methodology Guidance
The goal is to construct an ActorProfile with enough information to inform field exploration and goal decomposition. How you get there is your decision.
**Typical flow:** 1. `explore-resume` first (one-time, never re-run) 2. `clarify-resources` → `ask-constraints` → `ask-intentionality`
**But you may:**
- Return to `ask-intentionality` at any point when you discover a deeper WHY to probe
- Interleave `clarify-resources` when intentionality probing reveals resource-related gaps
- Skip or abbreviate SOPs when the user's initial message already provides the information
**End condition:** You judge that you have enough information to construct a meaningful ActorProfile. In cold-start scenarios, "enough" may mean just establishing boundaries (what the user won't do) rather than specifics.
Cold-Start Special Case
When the user doesn't know what they want or can do, the ActorProfile captures boundaries rather than commitments:
- "User has experience in NLP and GNN, won't jump to physics/chemistry"
- "Timeline is flexible, no hard deadline"
- "Motivated by interest, not graduation pressure"
This is sufficient — later tactics will help narrow within these boundaries.
Output (Tactic-Level Aggregation)
After running the SOPs you deem necessary, synthesize an ActorProfile:
ActorProfile {
background: { skills, projects, publications, researchExp }
resources: { compute, timeline, collaboration, data, environment }
constraints: { venue, methodology, avoidance, advisor }
intentionality: {
motivation, successDefinition,
riskTolerance, innovationPreference,
independencePreference, timeUrgency, learningWillingness
}
boundary: "..." // what the user definitely won't do
}This is a conceptual schema, not a JSON requirement. Express it in whatever format serves the downstream context best.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | ask-constraints | Understand hard boundaries on the user's research — target venues, methodology preferences, areas to avoid, advisor/team requirements. Not limited to ML/AI — works for any research domain. | | ask-intentionality | Deep WHY probing inspired by i* Intentionality modeling. Understand the user's motivation, success definition, risk tolerance, innovation preference, independence preference, time urgency, and learning willingness. The most important SOP in actor-profiling — understanding WHY drives everything downstream. | | clarify-resources | Understand what resources the user has available for research — compute, timeline, collaboration, data access, experimental environment. Every item accepts 'TBD' as a valid answer. | | explore-resume | Understand the user's background comprehensively — technical stack, project experience, research experience, publications, research directions. Allows user to express interest beyond their resume. Execute once only, never re-run. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Other skills on de-anthropocentric-research-engine.
- /formated-results
Closing skill for the research-executor, loaded as the last step of formated-specs. Summarize the design just produced into one research-result JSON fenced block in your reply. Do not execute the research.
Open skill - /formated-specs
Spec-slot skill for the research-executor. Emit the 4-layer DARE orchestration of the assigned topic as one research-graph JSON fenced block in your reply. Replaces the generic spec-writing step.
Open skill - /injection-fidelity
Loss-1 judge (codex role). Given one sample's de-identified dialogue and its PolicyCard, decide axis-by-axis whether the user-simulator enacted the card's per-axis pressure. Judge enactment of the card, never whether the research is good.
Open skill - /ladder-quality-order
Loss-2 judge (codex role). Over one topic's 6 shuffled research-design samples, pairwise-rank by quality using the D1–D5 standard. Emit the pairwise log; the harness computes the order and the ladder verdicts. Judge quality difference, never against academic standards.
Open skill - /optimization-loop
The optimizer brain for the ladder-foundry pretraining loop. Runs the two-level nested batch loop, delegates gating to gate_eval, attributes a failing batch to one weight (attribute-first), and recovers from disk after compaction. Control flow is fully scripted; only the
Open skill - /acu-nugget-recall
Tactic: Extract atomic units from one paper and score how much of a caller-supplied summary covers. Use for ACU-style binary or Nugget-style ternary recall checks; cannot run without a target summary.
Open skill

