Skip to content
Security
Skill

/hack

Entry P0 primary router and operating doctrine for HackSkills. Use when the task involves web application testing, API security assessment, recon, vulnerability triage, exploit path planning, authorized pentest, code audit, source-leak mining, middleware audit, SOC triage,

From plugin
hack-skills
2.2k103 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add yaklang/hack-skills --skill hack --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/hack

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Entry P0 primary router and operating doctrine for HackSkills. Use when the task involves web application testing, API security assessment, recon, vulnerability triage, exploit path planning, authorized pentest, code audit, source-leak mining, middleware audit, SOC triage,

SKILL.md

hack.SKILL.md
name: hack
description: >-
  Entry P0 primary router and operating doctrine for HackSkills. Use when the
  task involves web application testing, API security assessment, recon,
  vulnerability triage, exploit path planning, authorized pentest, code audit,
  source-leak mining, middleware audit, SOC triage, detection engineering,
  incident response, or choosing the right next category skill before any deep
  topic skill. Also use when the user mentions 安全工程师, 渗透测试, 红队, 蓝队, 代码审计,
  源码泄露, SRC. Enforce impact-first testing, finish the current asset cluster
  before expanding, follow half-chains to real control, and require live
  verification of secrets.

HACKING SKILLS / HackSkills

Overview

This is the **master quality gate and technical router** for authorized bug bounty, web/API security, pentest, code audit, source-leak work, and (when the task is blue) SOC / detection / IR.

It does not replace specialized techniques. It makes the agent:

1. Pass the start gate (authorization, role, scope, success definition) 2. Spend effort on paths that reach real control 3. Route by observed behavior to the correct category / deep topic skill 4. Prefer structured methodology over baseline-model memory and scanner dumps

This file is a quality gate, not a capability ceiling. Surfaces not listed here stay in play if field evidence exists.

This file is not an exploit cookbook. Weaponized details live in deep topic skills and are used only on authorized targets.

Load on demand:

  • Red-team execution → [RED_TEAM.md](./RED_TEAM.md)
  • Test matrix and effort → [TEST_MATRIX.md](./TEST_MATRIX.md)
  • Blue-team execution → [BLUE_TEAM.md](./BLUE_TEAM.md)
  • Code audit → [CODE_AUDIT.md](./CODE_AUDIT.md)
  • Source leak → [SOURCE_LEAK.md](./SOURCE_LEAK.md)
  • Evidence and report → [EVIDENCE_REPORT.md](./EVIDENCE_REPORT.md)

0. Task Start Gate

Complete in order. Stop if any item is missing:

1. **Authorization**: written auth, RoE, scope, prohibitions, contact, emergency stop. No authorization → refuse. 2. **Role**: red-team test / code audit / source leak / middleware audit / blue triage / detection engineering / IR. Parallel work is allowed; there is only one primary role. 3. **Scope mode**:

  • User gave a fixed URL / system / repo → **locked scope**: follow same-product hosts, gateways, API domains, and same-host extra paths that the business flow naturally exposes. Do not scan unrelated brand lines.
  • User gave an org name and asked to find boundary assets → **exploratory scope**: finish the current asset cluster before opening the next. Do not search many seeds shallowly.

4. **Success definition**: what "done" means for this task. Scanner-finished, report-emitted, and ticket-closed are not success. 5. **Destruction boundary**: list actions that must never happen. 6. **Working directory** before any test: `assets/` (URLs, API inventory, script excerpts), `evidence/` (requests, diffs, screenshots), `reports/` (confirmed findings only). 7. **Questions**: if scope is unclear, ask only the 1–3 technical blockers (target, stack, whether an account exists). Do not use "should I continue" as a way to stop. Missing a second account → degrade to what is testable; do not idle waiting for account B.

Do not expand onto unauthorized assets.

1. Hard Constraints

  • Stay in scope. Out-of-scope clues: record, then request expansion. No silent expansion.
  • No destructive testing or destructive containment: delete other people's business data, DROP/TRUNCATE, bulk config change, encrypt/ransom-like actions, unbounded DoS, wipe logs, wipe images.
  • Write-ops that prove access: create only identifiable test objects, delete that one object immediately. Do not change other people's orders, addresses, passwords, roles, or bindings. No charge, stock wipe, or account lock.
  • Do not log out, revoke, or deactivate a session the user provided. If password/binding change is required to prove impact, revert immediately; if revert fails, stop at the response — do not brick the account.
  • Do not cause irreversible damage to prove a break. Prefer read-only, copy, or low-privilege proof.
  • Evidence must be readable and reproducible. A conclusion without repro steps is a hypothesis.
  • Do not fabricate PoCs, logs, or exploit chains. If path, file, query, and screenshot do not line up, downgrade or withdraw.
  • Copied secrets are clues until they pass the **liveness gate**: production accepts the real value (rejects a fake), and one read-only call returns identity or an object list.
  • A finding reached with a session is not "anonymous unauthorized". Anonymous only if the break had no login state.
  • For internal users, assume false positive or mistake until the timeline proves otherwise.
  • If a security control blocks real work, it will be bypassed. Remediation must include a usable safe path.

2. Role Routing

| User intent | Primary flow | Load | |---|---|---| | Pentest / red team / foothold / SRC | §§3–5 | [RED_TEAM.md](./RED_TEAM.md), [TEST_MATRIX.md](./TEST_MATRIX.md) | | Code audit / whitebox / find sinks | §3 R6 | [CODE_AUDIT.md](./CODE_AUDIT.md) | | Source leak / Git leak / secret leak | §3 R5 | [SOURCE_LEAK.md](./SOURCE_LEAK.md), [insecure-source-code-management](../insecure-source-code-management/SKILL.md) | | Middleware / gateway / component audit | §3 R7 | [RED_TEAM.md](./RED_TEAM.md) middleware section, [unauthorized-access-common-services](../unauthorized-access-common-services/SKILL.md) | | Alert triage / SOC / hunting | Blue quality gate | [BLUE_TEAM.md](./BLUE_TEAM.md) | | Detection rules | Blue B6 | [BLUE_TEAM.md](./BLUE_TEAM.md), template in [EVIDENCE_REPORT.md](./EVIDENCE_REPORT.md) | | IR / forensics / containment | Blue B7 | [BLUE_TEAM.md](./BLUE_TEAM.md), [memory-forensics-volatility](../memory-forensics-volatility/SKILL.md), [traffic-analysis-pcap](../traffic-analysis-pcap/SKILL.md) | | Write the report | §6 | [EVIDENCE_REPORT.md](./EVIDENCE_REPORT.md) |

When a task crosses red and blue, freeze ev

Read more
Ships withhack-skills

Master Entry → Category Entries → Deep Topic Skills One master entry, six category entries, and 102 deep topic skills across 14 security domains.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on hack-skills.