/system-profile
Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) for performance analysis. Use when user says \"profile\", \"benchmark\", \"bottleneck\", or wants performance analysis.
$ npx -y skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill system-profile --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/system-profile
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) for performance analysis. Use when user says \"profile\", \"benchmark\", \"bottleneck\", or wants performance analysis.
SKILL.md
system-profile.SKILL.mdname: system-profile
description: "Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) for performance analysis. Use when user says \"profile\", \"benchmark\", \"bottleneck\", or wants performance analysis."
argument-hint: '<target, e.g. "train.py", "gpu", "pid 1234", "vllm serving">'
System Profile
Profile the specified target and summarize the results. Target: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
You are a profiling assistant. Based on the user's target, choose appropriate profiling strategies, **including writing instrumentation code when needed**, then run profiling, analyze results, and produce a summary.
Step 1: Determine the profiling target
Parse `$ARGUMENTS` to understand what to profile. Examples:
- A Python script or module
- A running process (PID or service name)
- A specific function or code block
- An entire framework or system (e.g., "autogen", "vllm serving") — profile its end-to-end execution, identify bottlenecks across components
- "gpu" / "interconnect" / "memory" for focused profiling
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty or unclear, ask the user.
Step 2: Choose profiling methods
Select from external tools and/or code instrumentation as appropriate. Don't limit yourself to the examples below — use whatever makes sense for the target.
**External tools** (check availability first):
- CPU: `cProfile`, `py-spy`, `line_profiler`, `perf stat`, `/usr/bin/time -v`
- Memory: `tracemalloc`, `memory_profiler`, `memray`
- GPU: `nvidia-smi`, `nvidia-smi dmon`, `nvitop`, `torch.profiler`, `nsys`
- Interconnect: `nvidia-smi topo -m`, `nvidia-smi nvlink`, `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO`
- System: `strace -c`, `iostat`, `vmstat`
**Code instrumentation** — when external tools are insufficient, write and insert profiling code into the target. Typical scenarios:
- Timing specific code blocks (wall time vs CPU time)
- Measuring CPU-GPU or GPU-GPU transfer size, frequency, and bandwidth
- Tracking memory allocation across CPU and GPU to detect redundancy
- Wrapping NCCL collectives to measure latency and throughput
- Adding CUDA event timing around kernels
Design the instrumentation based on what you observe in the code — don't use a fixed template.
Step 3: Key dimensions to investigate
Depending on the target, focus on some or all of these:
**CPU overhead**
- Context switching (voluntary / involuntary)
- CPU utilization: ratio of CPU time to wall time
- Per-function execution time hotspots
**Memory overhead**
- CPU and GPU memory usage (allocated vs reserved vs peak)
- Redundant replication: same data living on both CPU and GPU
- Per-device allocation balance in multi-GPU setups
**Interconnect & communication**
- CPU-GPU transfer: frequency, per-transfer size, total volume, bandwidth achieved
- GPU-GPU transfer: P2P bandwidth, NVLink vs PCIe topology impact
- NCCL collectives: operation type, message size distribution, latency
- Communication-to-computation ratio
**GPU compute**
- SM utilization, kernel launch overhead
- Memory bandwidth utilization vs peak
Step 4: Instrumentation guidelines
When inserting code into the target: 1. Read and understand the target code first 2. Prefer wrapping (decorator, context manager, standalone runner) over inline edits 3. If inline edits are necessary, mark them clearly (e.g., `# [PROFILE]` comments) 4. Minimize observer effect — don't instrument tight inner loops; sample instead 5. Collect results into a structured log, don't scatter print statements
Step 5: Run profiling
1. Check available tools and hardware topology 2. Run the chosen methods, capture all output 3. Save artifacts (flamegraphs, traces, logs) to `./profile_output/`
Step 6: Produce the report
**Part A — Profiling results** (structured tables by dimension, as applicable):
- CPU overhead table
- Memory overhead table (with redundancy column)
- Interconnect table (transfer type / frequency / size / latency / bandwidth)
- Hotspots / bottleneck identification
- Actionable recommendations ranked by expected impact
**Part B — Instrumentation changelog** (MANDATORY): List every file that was modified or created for profiling purposes:
| File | Change type | What was added/modified | Line(s) | |------|-------------|------------------------|---------| | ... | modified | ... | ... | | ... | created | ... | — |
This allows the user to review and revert all instrumentation changes. Offer to clean up (remove all instrumentation) when the user is done.
Read more
name: system-profile description: "Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) for performance analysis. Use when user says \"profile\", \"benchmark\", \"bottleneck\", or wants performance analysis." argument-hint: '<target, e.g. "train.py", "gpu", "pid 1234", "vllm serving">'
System Profile
Profile the specified target and summarize the results. Target: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
You are a profiling assistant. Based on the user's target, choose appropriate profiling strategies, **including writing instrumentation code when needed**, then run profiling, analyze results, and produce a summary.
Step 1: Determine the profiling target
Parse `$ARGUMENTS` to understand what to profile. Examples:
- A Python script or module
- A running process (PID or service name)
- A specific function or code block
- An entire framework or system (e.g., "autogen", "vllm serving") — profile its end-to-end execution, identify bottlenecks across components
- "gpu" / "interconnect" / "memory" for focused profiling
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty or unclear, ask the user.
Step 2: Choose profiling methods
Select from external tools and/or code instrumentation as appropriate. Don't limit yourself to the examples below — use whatever makes sense for the target.
**External tools** (check availability first):
- CPU: `cProfile`, `py-spy`, `line_profiler`, `perf stat`, `/usr/bin/time -v`
- Memory: `tracemalloc`, `memory_profiler`, `memray`
- GPU: `nvidia-smi`, `nvidia-smi dmon`, `nvitop`, `torch.profiler`, `nsys`
- Interconnect: `nvidia-smi topo -m`, `nvidia-smi nvlink`, `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO`
- System: `strace -c`, `iostat`, `vmstat`
**Code instrumentation** — when external tools are insufficient, write and insert profiling code into the target. Typical scenarios:
- Timing specific code blocks (wall time vs CPU time)
- Measuring CPU-GPU or GPU-GPU transfer size, frequency, and bandwidth
- Tracking memory allocation across CPU and GPU to detect redundancy
- Wrapping NCCL collectives to measure latency and throughput
- Adding CUDA event timing around kernels
Design the instrumentation based on what you observe in the code — don't use a fixed template.
Step 3: Key dimensions to investigate
Depending on the target, focus on some or all of these:
**CPU overhead**
- Context switching (voluntary / involuntary)
- CPU utilization: ratio of CPU time to wall time
- Per-function execution time hotspots
**Memory overhead**
- CPU and GPU memory usage (allocated vs reserved vs peak)
- Redundant replication: same data living on both CPU and GPU
- Per-device allocation balance in multi-GPU setups
**Interconnect & communication**
- CPU-GPU transfer: frequency, per-transfer size, total volume, bandwidth achieved
- GPU-GPU transfer: P2P bandwidth, NVLink vs PCIe topology impact
- NCCL collectives: operation type, message size distribution, latency
- Communication-to-computation ratio
**GPU compute**
- SM utilization, kernel launch overhead
- Memory bandwidth utilization vs peak
Step 4: Instrumentation guidelines
When inserting code into the target: 1. Read and understand the target code first 2. Prefer wrapping (decorator, context manager, standalone runner) over inline edits 3. If inline edits are necessary, mark them clearly (e.g., `# [PROFILE]` comments) 4. Minimize observer effect — don't instrument tight inner loops; sample instead 5. Collect results into a structured log, don't scatter print statements
Step 5: Run profiling
1. Check available tools and hardware topology 2. Run the chosen methods, capture all output 3. Save artifacts (flamegraphs, traces, logs) to `./profile_output/`
Step 6: Produce the report
**Part A — Profiling results** (structured tables by dimension, as applicable):
- CPU overhead table
- Memory overhead table (with redundancy column)
- Interconnect table (transfer type / frequency / size / latency / bandwidth)
- Hotspots / bottleneck identification
- Actionable recommendations ranked by expected impact
**Part B — Instrumentation changelog** (MANDATORY): List every file that was modified or created for profiling purposes:
| File | Change type | What was added/modified | Line(s) | |------|-------------|------------------------|---------| | ... | modified | ... | ... | | ... | created | ... | — |
This allows the user to review and revert all instrumentation changes. Offer to clean up (remove all instrumentation) when the user is done.
· · · · · · -orange?style=flat) · · 💬 Join Community · 💡 Use ARIS as a skill-based workflow in Claude Code / Codex CLI / Cursor / Trae / Antigravity / GitHub Copilot CLI / OpenClaw, or get the full experience with the standalone ARIS-Code CLI — enjoy any
Other skills on auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.
- /ablation-planner
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
Open skill - /alphaxiv
Quick single-paper lookup via AlphaXiv LLM-optimized summaries with tiered source fallback. Use when user says "explain this paper", "summarize paper", pastes an arXiv/AlphaXiv URL, or provides a bare arXiv ID for quick understanding - not for broad literature search.
Open skill - /analyze-results
Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results", "compare", or needs to interpret experimental data.
Open skill - /arxiv
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Use when user says "search arxiv", "download paper", "fetch arxiv", "arxiv search", "get paper pdf", or wants to find and save papers from arXiv to the local paper library.
Open skill - /auto-paper-improvement-loop
Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-5.6-Sol xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says \"改论文\", \"improve paper\", \"论文润色循环\", \"auto improve\", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.
Open skill - /auto-review-loop-llm
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
Open skill

