ablation-planner
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
Workflow 1: Full idea discovery pipeline to go from a broad research direction to validated, pilot-tested ideas. Use when user says \"找idea全流程\", \"idea discovery pipeline\", \"从零开始找方向\", or wants the complete idea exploration workflow.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill idea-discovery -a windsurf -y
name: idea-discovery description: "Workflow 1: Full idea discovery pipeline to go from a broad research direction to validated, pilot-tested ideas. Use when user says \"找idea全流程\", \"idea discovery pipeline\", \"从零开始找方向\", or wants the complete idea exploration workflow." argument-hint: "[research-direction]" allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, WebFetch, Skill, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply
> **Before each reviewer slot**, follow [Selectable Reviewers](../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md): > resolve invocation → `.aris/reviewer.json` → Claude Code default (Codex MCP) > with `reviewer_route.py` through the canonical helper resolver, preserving this > slot's tier, fresh contexts, source/image inputs and deterministic gates. > Codex examples/pins below apply only to `backend=codex`; other routes use their > own first-call/reply contract. Save the route and actual returned identity; > unavailable selections are `REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE`. Classify acceptance from actual > families/completion/scope. Forward invocation reviewer/model/effort overrides > to reviewer-bearing children. Generation workers are unchanged.
Orchestrate a complete idea discovery workflow for: **$ARGUMENTS**
This skill chains sub-skills into a single automated pipeline:
/research-lit → /idea-creator → /novelty-check → /research-review → /research-refine-pipeline (survey) (brainstorm) (verify novel) (critical feedback) (refine method + plan experiments)
Each phase builds on the previous one's output. The final deliverables are a validated `idea-stage/IDEA_REPORT.md` with ranked ideas, plus a refined proposal (`refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`) and experiment plan (`refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md`) for the top idea.
> 💡 These are defaults. Override by telling the skill, e.g., `/idea-discovery "topic" — ref paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04329` or `/idea-discovery "topic" — compact: true`.
Resolve `AUTO_PROCEED` once from `$ARGUMENTS` before Phase 0 and keep that mode for the entire workflow.
not a question. State the result and the automatically selected next action, then continue executing in the **same turn**. Do not ask for confirmation, request user input, sleep, wait for silence, or end the turn at a checkpoint.
end the turn. Resume only after an explicit reply.
Never implement auto-proceed as “ask, then continue if there is no response.” Once a turn ends, silence cannot resume the workflow. The user can still interrupt a non-blocking run at any time.
This rule governs only `AUTO_PROCEED`-controlled selection checkpoints. If the user explicitly enables a Feishu **interactive** gate, that external approval or reply is an intentional blocking exception; wait for that user-controlled gate rather than treating it as a silence timeout. Feishu off/push-only modes remain non-blocking under `AUTO_PROCEED=true`.
Resolve `run_state.py` and `idea_discovery_gate.py` through the same canonical helper chain used by `/research-pipeline`: `.aris/tools/` → `tools/` → `$ARIS_REPO/tools/` → `~/.aris/repo/tools/`. If either helper is unavailable, the final report is `BLOCKED`; do not silently continue without a state record.
For a new run, derive `<run_id>` from the direction slug and date, then start this ordered state record with `--executor <actual-Claude-model>` (for example, `claude-sonnet-4.5`):
research-lit,idea-creat
· · · · · · · · 💬 Join Community · 🌱 ARIS is a methodology, not a platform. What matters is the research workflow — take it wherever you go.
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
Quick single-paper lookup via AlphaXiv LLM-optimized summaries with tiered source fallback. Use when user says "explain this…
Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results",…
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Use when user says "search arxiv", "download paper", "fetch arxiv",…
Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-6-Astra xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user…
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables.…
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…