/dse-loop
Autonomous design space exploration loop for computer architecture and EDA. Runs a program, analyzes results, tunes parameters, and iterates until objective is met or timeout. Use when user says \"DSE\", \"design space exploration\", \"sweep parameters\", \"optimize\", \"find
$ npx -y skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill dse-loop --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/dse-loop
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Autonomous design space exploration loop for computer architecture and EDA. Runs a program, analyzes results, tunes parameters, and iterates until objective is met or timeout. Use when user says \"DSE\", \"design space exploration\", \"sweep parameters\", \"optimize\", \"find
SKILL.md
dse-loop.SKILL.mdname: dse-loop
description: "Autonomous design space exploration loop for computer architecture and EDA. Runs a program, analyzes results, tunes parameters, and iterates until objective is met or timeout. Use when user says \"DSE\", \"design space exploration\", \"sweep parameters\", \"optimize\", \"find best config\", or wants iterative parameter tuning."
argument-hint: "[task-description — include program, parameters, objective, and timeout]"
allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit
DSE Loop: Autonomous Design Space Exploration
> 🔁 **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop` / `CronCreate`.** It already loops > internally until its objective is met or it times out. Unlike the > verdict-bearing review/audit skills, its stop gate is an **objective > machine-checkable metric** (Type-A), so its self-termination is safe > same-model — the reason not to wrap it is **scheduler duplication**, not the > verdict fence. See > [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).
Autonomously explore a design space: run → analyze → pick next parameters → repeat, until the objective is met or timeout is reached. Designed for computer architecture and EDA problems.
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Safety Rules — READ FIRST
**NEVER do any of the following:**
- `sudo` anything
- `rm -rf`, `rm -r`, or any recursive deletion
- `rm` any file you did not create in this session
- Overwrite existing source files without reading them first
- `git push`, `git reset --hard`, or any destructive git operation
- Kill processes you did not start
**If a step requires any of the above, STOP and report to the user.**
Constants (override via $ARGUMENTS)
| Constant | Default | Description | |----------|---------|-------------| | `TIMEOUT` | 2h | Total wall-clock budget. Stop exploring after this. | | `MAX_ITERATIONS` | 50 | Hard cap on number of design points evaluated. | | `PATIENCE` | 10 | Stop early if no improvement for this many consecutive iterations. | | `OBJECTIVE` | minimize | `minimize` or `maximize` the target metric. |
Override inline: `/dse-loop "task desc — timeout: 4h, max_iterations: 100, patience: 15"`
Typical Use Cases
| Problem | Program | Parameters | Objective | |---------|---------|-----------|-----------| | Microarch DSE | gem5 simulation | cache size, assoc, pipeline width, ROB size, branch predictor | maximize IPC or minimize area×delay | | Synthesis tuning | yosys/DC script | optimization passes, target freq, effort level | minimize area at timing closure | | RTL parameterization | verilator sim | data width, FIFO depth, pipeline stages, buffer sizes | meet throughput target at min area | | Compiler flags | gcc/llvm build + benchmark | -O levels, unroll factor, vectorization, scheduling | minimize runtime or code size | | Placement/routing | openroad/innovus | utilization, aspect ratio, layer config | minimize wirelength / timing | | Formal verification | abc/sby | bound depth, engine, timeout per property | maximize coverage in time budget | | Memory subsystem | cacti / ramulator | bank count, row buffer policy, scheduling | optimize bandwidth/energy |
Workflow
Phase 0: Parse Task & Setup
1. **Parse $ARGUMENTS** to extract:
- **Program**: what to run (command, script, or Makefile target)
- **Parameter space**: which knobs to tune and their ranges/options (may be incomplete — see step 2)
- **Objective metric**: what to optimize (and how to extract it from output)
- **Constraints**: hard limits that must not be violated (e.g., timing must close)
- **Timeout**: wall-clock budget
- **Success criteria**: when is the result "good enough" to stop early?
2. **Infer missing parameter ranges** — If the user provides parameter names but NOT ranges/options, you MUST infer them before exploring:
a. **Read the source code** — search for the parameter names in the codebase:
- Look for argparse/click definitions, config files, Makefile variables, module parameters, `#define`, `parameter` (SystemVerilog), `localparam`, etc.
- Extract defaults, types, and any comments hinting at valid values
b. **Apply domain knowledge** to set reasonable ranges: | Parameter type | Inference strategy | |---------------|-------------------| | Cache/memory sizes | Powers of 2, typically 1KB–16MB | | Associativity | Powers of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 | | Pipeline width / issue width | Small integers: 1, 2, 4, 8 | | Buffer/queue/FIFO depth | Powers of 2: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 | | Clock period / frequency | Based on technology node; try ±50% from default | | Bound depth (BMC/formal) | Geometric: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 | | Timeout values | Geometric: 10s, 30s, 60s, 120s, 300s | | Boolean/enum flags | Enumerate all options found in source | | Continuous (learning rate, threshold) | Log-scale sweep: 5 points spanning 2 orders of magnitude around default | | Integer counts (threads, cores) | Linear: from 1 to hardware max |
c. **Start conservative** — begin with 3-5 values per parameter. Expand range later if the best result is at a boundary.
d. **Log inferred ranges** — write the inferred parameter space to `dse_results/inferred_params.md` so the user can review:
# Inferred Parameter Space
| Parameter | Source | Default | Inferred Range | Reasoning |
|-----------|--------|---------|---------------|-----------|
| CACHE_SIZE | config.py:42 | 32768 | [8192, 16384, 32768, 65536, 131072] | powers of 2, ±2x from default |
| ASSOC | config.py:43 | 4 | [1, 2, 4, 8] | standard associativities |
| BMC_DEPTH | run_bmc.py:15 | 10 | [5, 10, 20, 50] | geometric, common BMC depths |e. **Boundary expansion** — during the search, if the best result is at the min or max of a range, automatically extend that range by one step in that direction (but log the extension).
3. **Read the project** to understand:
- How
Read more
name: dse-loop description: "Autonomous design space exploration loop for computer architecture and EDA. Runs a program, analyzes results, tunes parameters, and iterates until objective is met or timeout. Use when user says \"DSE\", \"design space exploration\", \"sweep parameters\", \"optimize\", \"find best config\", or wants iterative parameter tuning." argument-hint: "[task-description — include program, parameters, objective, and timeout]" allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit
DSE Loop: Autonomous Design Space Exploration
> 🔁 **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop` / `CronCreate`.** It already loops > internally until its objective is met or it times out. Unlike the > verdict-bearing review/audit skills, its stop gate is an **objective > machine-checkable metric** (Type-A), so its self-termination is safe > same-model — the reason not to wrap it is **scheduler duplication**, not the > verdict fence. See > [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).
Autonomously explore a design space: run → analyze → pick next parameters → repeat, until the objective is met or timeout is reached. Designed for computer architecture and EDA problems.
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Safety Rules — READ FIRST
**NEVER do any of the following:**
- `sudo` anything
- `rm -rf`, `rm -r`, or any recursive deletion
- `rm` any file you did not create in this session
- Overwrite existing source files without reading them first
- `git push`, `git reset --hard`, or any destructive git operation
- Kill processes you did not start
**If a step requires any of the above, STOP and report to the user.**
Constants (override via $ARGUMENTS)
| Constant | Default | Description | |----------|---------|-------------| | `TIMEOUT` | 2h | Total wall-clock budget. Stop exploring after this. | | `MAX_ITERATIONS` | 50 | Hard cap on number of design points evaluated. | | `PATIENCE` | 10 | Stop early if no improvement for this many consecutive iterations. | | `OBJECTIVE` | minimize | `minimize` or `maximize` the target metric. |
Override inline: `/dse-loop "task desc — timeout: 4h, max_iterations: 100, patience: 15"`
Typical Use Cases
| Problem | Program | Parameters | Objective | |---------|---------|-----------|-----------| | Microarch DSE | gem5 simulation | cache size, assoc, pipeline width, ROB size, branch predictor | maximize IPC or minimize area×delay | | Synthesis tuning | yosys/DC script | optimization passes, target freq, effort level | minimize area at timing closure | | RTL parameterization | verilator sim | data width, FIFO depth, pipeline stages, buffer sizes | meet throughput target at min area | | Compiler flags | gcc/llvm build + benchmark | -O levels, unroll factor, vectorization, scheduling | minimize runtime or code size | | Placement/routing | openroad/innovus | utilization, aspect ratio, layer config | minimize wirelength / timing | | Formal verification | abc/sby | bound depth, engine, timeout per property | maximize coverage in time budget | | Memory subsystem | cacti / ramulator | bank count, row buffer policy, scheduling | optimize bandwidth/energy |
Workflow
Phase 0: Parse Task & Setup
1. **Parse $ARGUMENTS** to extract:
- **Program**: what to run (command, script, or Makefile target)
- **Parameter space**: which knobs to tune and their ranges/options (may be incomplete — see step 2)
- **Objective metric**: what to optimize (and how to extract it from output)
- **Constraints**: hard limits that must not be violated (e.g., timing must close)
- **Timeout**: wall-clock budget
- **Success criteria**: when is the result "good enough" to stop early?
2. **Infer missing parameter ranges** — If the user provides parameter names but NOT ranges/options, you MUST infer them before exploring:
a. **Read the source code** — search for the parameter names in the codebase:
- Look for argparse/click definitions, config files, Makefile variables, module parameters, `#define`, `parameter` (SystemVerilog), `localparam`, etc.
- Extract defaults, types, and any comments hinting at valid values
b. **Apply domain knowledge** to set reasonable ranges: | Parameter type | Inference strategy | |---------------|-------------------| | Cache/memory sizes | Powers of 2, typically 1KB–16MB | | Associativity | Powers of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 | | Pipeline width / issue width | Small integers: 1, 2, 4, 8 | | Buffer/queue/FIFO depth | Powers of 2: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 | | Clock period / frequency | Based on technology node; try ±50% from default | | Bound depth (BMC/formal) | Geometric: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 | | Timeout values | Geometric: 10s, 30s, 60s, 120s, 300s | | Boolean/enum flags | Enumerate all options found in source | | Continuous (learning rate, threshold) | Log-scale sweep: 5 points spanning 2 orders of magnitude around default | | Integer counts (threads, cores) | Linear: from 1 to hardware max |
c. **Start conservative** — begin with 3-5 values per parameter. Expand range later if the best result is at a boundary.
d. **Log inferred ranges** — write the inferred parameter space to `dse_results/inferred_params.md` so the user can review:
# Inferred Parameter Space
| Parameter | Source | Default | Inferred Range | Reasoning |
|-----------|--------|---------|---------------|-----------|
| CACHE_SIZE | config.py:42 | 32768 | [8192, 16384, 32768, 65536, 131072] | powers of 2, ±2x from default |
| ASSOC | config.py:43 | 4 | [1, 2, 4, 8] | standard associativities |
| BMC_DEPTH | run_bmc.py:15 | 10 | [5, 10, 20, 50] | geometric, common BMC depths |e. **Boundary expansion** — during the search, if the best result is at the min or max of a range, automatically extend that range by one step in that direction (but log the extension).
3. **Read the project** to understand:
- How
· · · · · · -orange?style=flat) · · 💬 Join Community · 💡 Use ARIS as a skill-based workflow in Claude Code / Codex CLI / Cursor / Trae / Antigravity / GitHub Copilot CLI / OpenClaw, or get the full experience with the standalone ARIS-Code CLI — enjoy any
Other skills on auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.
- /ablation-planner
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
Open skill - /alphaxiv
Quick single-paper lookup via AlphaXiv LLM-optimized summaries with tiered source fallback. Use when user says "explain this paper", "summarize paper", pastes an arXiv/AlphaXiv URL, or provides a bare arXiv ID for quick understanding - not for broad literature search.
Open skill - /analyze-results
Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results", "compare", or needs to interpret experimental data.
Open skill - /arxiv
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Use when user says "search arxiv", "download paper", "fetch arxiv", "arxiv search", "get paper pdf", or wants to find and save papers from arXiv to the local paper library.
Open skill - /auto-paper-improvement-loop
Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-5.6-Sol xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says \"改论文\", \"improve paper\", \"论文润色循环\", \"auto improve\", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.
Open skill - /auto-review-loop-llm
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
Open skill

