/auto-review-loop-minimax
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
$ npx -y skills add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill auto-review-loop-minimax --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition â
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/auto-review-loop-minimax
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
SKILL.md
auto-review-loop-minimax.SKILL.mdname: auto-review-loop-minimax
description: Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
argument-hint: "[topic-or-scope]"
allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit, Skill
Auto Review Loop (MiniMax Version): Autonomous Research Improvement
> đ **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop`, `/schedule`, or `CronCreate`.** Like > `/auto-review-loop`, it already loops internally (review â fix â re-review), > feeding each round's prior-round summary into the next review prompt (the > backend is a stateless per-round API call, not a shared thread). An external > timer re-enters from the top each tick, dropping that accumulated context and > firing the verdict on wall-clock time instead of on artifact change â zero > new signal, full token cost. Schedule the *external wait that precedes it*, > not the verdict. See > [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).
Autonomously iterate: review â implement fixes â re-review, until the external reviewer gives a positive assessment or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
- MAX_ROUNDS = 4
- POSITIVE_THRESHOLD: score >= 6/10 **AND** verdict â {"ready", "almost"} â **both** must hold, matching the operative STOP CONDITION below. Verdict vocabulary is {"ready", "almost", "not ready"}. (Earlier wording used `or` and a stale verdict set; the `AND` form is authoritative.)
- REVIEW_DOC: `review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md` (cumulative log) *(fall back to `./AUTO_REVIEW.md` for legacy projects)*
- REVIEWER_MODEL = `MiniMax-M3` â Model used via MiniMax API
API Configuration
This skill uses MiniMax API for external review. Two methods are supported:
Method 1: MCP Tool (Primary)
If `mcp__minimax-chat__minimax_chat` is available, use it:
mcp__minimax-chat__minimax_chat:
prompt: |
[Review prompt content]
model: "MiniMax-M3"
system: "You are a senior machine learning researcher..."Method 2: curl (Fallback)
If MCP is not available, use curl directly:
curl -s "https://api.minimax.io/v1/chat/completions" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MINIMAX_API_KEY" \
-d '{
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a senior ML researcher..."},
{"role": "user", "content": "[Review prompt]"}
],
"max_tokens": 4096
}'**API Key**: Read from `~/.claude/settings.json` under `env.MINIMAX_API_KEY`, or from environment variable.
**Why MiniMax instead of Codex MCP?** Codex CLI uses OpenAI's Responses API (`/v1/responses`) which is not supported by third-party providers. See: https://github.com/openai/codex/discussions/7782
State Persistence (Compact Recovery)
Long-running loops may hit the context window limit, triggering automatic compaction. To survive this, persist state to `review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json` after each round:
{
"round": 2,
"status": "in_progress",
"last_score": 5.0,
"last_verdict": "not ready",
"pending_experiments": ["screen_name_1"],
"timestamp": "2026-03-13T21:00:00"
}**Write this file at the end of every Phase E** (after documenting the round). Overwrite each time â only the latest state matters.
**On completion** (positive assessment or max rounds), set `"status": "completed"` so future invocations don't accidentally resume a finished loop.
Workflow
Initialization
1. **Check for `review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json`** *(fall back to `./REVIEW_STATE.json` if not found â legacy path)*:
- If neither path exists: **fresh start** (normal case)
- If it exists AND `status` is `"completed"`: **fresh start** (previous loop finished normally)
- If it exists AND `status` is `"in_progress"` AND `timestamp` is older than 24 hours: **fresh start** (stale state from a killed/abandoned run â delete the file and start over)
- If it exists AND `status` is `"in_progress"` AND `timestamp` is within 24 hours: **resume**
- Read the state file to recover `round`, `last_score`, `pending_experiments`
- Read `review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md` to restore full context of prior rounds *(fall back to `./AUTO_REVIEW.md`)*
- If `pending_experiments` is non-empty, check if they have completed (e.g., check screen sessions)
- Resume from the next round (round = saved round + 1)
- Log: "Recovered from context compaction. Resuming at Round N."
2. Read project narrative documents, memory files, and any prior review documents 3. Read recent experiment results (check output directories, logs) 4. Identify current weaknesses and open TODOs from prior reviews 5. Initialize round counter = 1 (unless recovered from state file) 6. Create/update `review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md` with header and timestamp
Loop (repeat up to MAX_ROUNDS)
Phase A: Review
Send comprehensive context to the external reviewer.
**Check MCP availability first**, then use appropriate method:
**If MCP available (Primary):**
Use mcp__minimax-chat__minimax_chat tool with:
- system: "You are a senior machine learning researcher serving as a reviewer for top-tier conferences like NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR. Provide rigorous, constructive feedback."
- prompt: [Full review prompt with context]
- model: "MiniMax-M3"
**If MCP NOT available (Fallback):**
curl -s "https://api.minimax.io/v1/chat/completions" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MINIMAX_API_KEY" \
-d '{
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"messages": [
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are a senior machine learning researcher serving as a reviewer for top-tier conferences like NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR. Provide rigorous, constructive feedback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Round N/MAX_ROUNDS of autonomous review loop]\n\n[Full researchRead more
name: auto-review-loop-minimax description: Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review". argument-hint: "[topic-or-scope]" allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit, Skill
Auto Review Loop (MiniMax Version): Autonomous Research Improvement
> đ **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop`, `/schedule`, or `CronCreate`.** Like > `/auto-review-loop`, it already loops internally (review â fix â re-review), > feeding each round's prior-round summary into the next review prompt (the > backend is a stateless per-round API call, not a shared thread). An external > timer re-enters from the top each tick, dropping that accumulated context and > firing the verdict on wall-clock time instead of on artifact change â zero > new signal, full token cost. Schedule the *external wait that precedes it*, > not the verdict. See > [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).
Autonomously iterate: review â implement fixes â re-review, until the external reviewer gives a positive assessment or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
- MAX_ROUNDS = 4
- POSITIVE_THRESHOLD: score >= 6/10 **AND** verdict â {"ready", "almost"} â **both** must hold, matching the operative STOP CONDITION below. Verdict vocabulary is {"ready", "almost", "not ready"}. (Earlier wording used `or` and a stale verdict set; the `AND` form is authoritative.)
- REVIEW_DOC: `review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md` (cumulative log) *(fall back to `./AUTO_REVIEW.md` for legacy projects)*
- REVIEWER_MODEL = `MiniMax-M3` â Model used via MiniMax API
API Configuration
This skill uses MiniMax API for external review. Two methods are supported:
Method 1: MCP Tool (Primary)
If `mcp__minimax-chat__minimax_chat` is available, use it:
mcp__minimax-chat__minimax_chat:
prompt: |
[Review prompt content]
model: "MiniMax-M3"
system: "You are a senior machine learning researcher..."Method 2: curl (Fallback)
If MCP is not available, use curl directly:
curl -s "https://api.minimax.io/v1/chat/completions" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MINIMAX_API_KEY" \
-d '{
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a senior ML researcher..."},
{"role": "user", "content": "[Review prompt]"}
],
"max_tokens": 4096
}'**API Key**: Read from `~/.claude/settings.json` under `env.MINIMAX_API_KEY`, or from environment variable.
**Why MiniMax instead of Codex MCP?** Codex CLI uses OpenAI's Responses API (`/v1/responses`) which is not supported by third-party providers. See: https://github.com/openai/codex/discussions/7782
State Persistence (Compact Recovery)
Long-running loops may hit the context window limit, triggering automatic compaction. To survive this, persist state to `review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json` after each round:
{
"round": 2,
"status": "in_progress",
"last_score": 5.0,
"last_verdict": "not ready",
"pending_experiments": ["screen_name_1"],
"timestamp": "2026-03-13T21:00:00"
}**Write this file at the end of every Phase E** (after documenting the round). Overwrite each time â only the latest state matters.
**On completion** (positive assessment or max rounds), set `"status": "completed"` so future invocations don't accidentally resume a finished loop.
Workflow
Initialization
1. **Check for `review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json`** *(fall back to `./REVIEW_STATE.json` if not found â legacy path)*:
- If neither path exists: **fresh start** (normal case)
- If it exists AND `status` is `"completed"`: **fresh start** (previous loop finished normally)
- If it exists AND `status` is `"in_progress"` AND `timestamp` is older than 24 hours: **fresh start** (stale state from a killed/abandoned run â delete the file and start over)
- If it exists AND `status` is `"in_progress"` AND `timestamp` is within 24 hours: **resume**
- Read the state file to recover `round`, `last_score`, `pending_experiments`
- Read `review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md` to restore full context of prior rounds *(fall back to `./AUTO_REVIEW.md`)*
- If `pending_experiments` is non-empty, check if they have completed (e.g., check screen sessions)
- Resume from the next round (round = saved round + 1)
- Log: "Recovered from context compaction. Resuming at Round N."
2. Read project narrative documents, memory files, and any prior review documents 3. Read recent experiment results (check output directories, logs) 4. Identify current weaknesses and open TODOs from prior reviews 5. Initialize round counter = 1 (unless recovered from state file) 6. Create/update `review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md` with header and timestamp
Loop (repeat up to MAX_ROUNDS)
Phase A: Review
Send comprehensive context to the external reviewer.
**Check MCP availability first**, then use appropriate method:
**If MCP available (Primary):**
Use mcp__minimax-chat__minimax_chat tool with: - system: "You are a senior machine learning researcher serving as a reviewer for top-tier conferences like NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR. Provide rigorous, constructive feedback." - prompt: [Full review prompt with context] - model: "MiniMax-M3"
**If MCP NOT available (Fallback):**
curl -s "https://api.minimax.io/v1/chat/completions" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MINIMAX_API_KEY" \
-d '{
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"messages": [
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are a senior machine learning researcher serving as a reviewer for top-tier conferences like NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR. Provide rigorous, constructive feedback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Round N/MAX_ROUNDS of autonomous review loop]\n\n[Full research¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ -orange?style=flat) ¡ ¡ đŦ Join Community ¡ đĄ Use ARIS as a skill-based workflow in Claude Code / Codex CLI / Cursor / Trae / Antigravity / GitHub Copilot CLI / OpenClaw, or get the full experience with the standalone ARIS-Code CLI â enjoy any
Other skills on auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.
- /ablation-planner
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
Open skill - /alphaxiv
Quick single-paper lookup via AlphaXiv LLM-optimized summaries with tiered source fallback. Use when user says "explain this paper", "summarize paper", pastes an arXiv/AlphaXiv URL, or provides a bare arXiv ID for quick understanding - not for broad literature search.
Open skill - /analyze-results
Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results", "compare", or needs to interpret experimental data.
Open skill - /arxiv
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Use when user says "search arxiv", "download paper", "fetch arxiv", "arxiv search", "get paper pdf", or wants to find and save papers from arXiv to the local paper library.
Open skill - /auto-paper-improvement-loop
Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-5.6-Sol xhigh review â implement fixes â recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says \"æščŽēæ\", \"improve paper\", \"čŽēææļĻč˛åžĒį¯\", \"auto improve\", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.
Open skill - /auto-review-loop-llm
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
Open skill

