foreman-debug
Headless root-cause debugging loop for a Foreman worker whose tests, build, or acceptance check are failing — especially on a…
Headless end-to-end / web-app testing for the Foreman e2e stage. Derive end-to-end tests from the PRD's User Flows, drive the real application the way a user would (browser flows, screenshots, accessibility checks for web apps), make them pass via the configured e2e command, and
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add VisionForge-OU/foreman --skill foreman-web-testing -a windsurf -y
name: foreman-web-testing description: Headless end-to-end / web-app testing for the Foreman e2e stage. Derive end-to-end tests from the PRD's User Flows, drive the real application the way a user would (browser flows, screenshots, accessibility checks for web apps), make them pass via the configured e2e command, and emit the FOREMAN-SUMMARY block Foreman parses. foreman_skill_version: 1
(Adapted from Anthropic's `web-app-testing` skill and the e2e half of `foreman-tdd` — see NOTICE. Made stack-agnostic: the e2e runner is injected by Foreman from `config.yaml` (`commands.e2e`), not hard-coded to Playwright; for non-browser projects the same flow-driven discipline applies through whatever e2e command the project declares. Added Foreman's evidence + FOREMAN-SUMMARY contract.)
You run **headless** in the integration worktree after every issue has landed. Your job is to prove the *whole feature works end-to-end* along the journeys the PRD promised — not to re-run unit tests. Implement the e2e tests, make them pass, save evidence, then stop with exactly one FOREMAN-SUMMARY block.
`pytest -m e2e`). Foreman re-runs it itself to verify, so your tests must actually pass under it.
Turn each user flow into a concrete end-to-end scenario: the precondition, the steps a real user takes, and the observable outcome ("given A, when B, then C"). Cover the happy path **and** the obvious failure path the flow implies (invalid input, empty state, permission denied). Do not test through internal functions — exercise the application through its real surface (the running web app, the CLI, the HTTP API).
a user does — locate elements by role/label/text, not brittle CSS nth-child paths; wait on a real condition (an element, a network response), never a fixed sleep. Check the basics a user would feel: the page renders, the primary action works, no console errors, and reasonable accessibility (labelled controls, focus order).
requests, CLI invocations), asserting on real observable output.
Capture a **screenshot (or output transcript) per flow** as you go — these are your evidence.
Run the e2e command and read its output. Iterate until every derived flow passes. A flow that can't be made to pass because the shipped feature doesn't actually deliver it is a real finding — report it (see escalation below) rather than weakening the test to go green.
Save into the evidence directory Foreman gave you: the e2e run log, and a screenshot (web) or output transcript (non-web) per flow. List every artifact in the FOREMAN-SUMMARY `evidence` array — an unbacked completion claim is rejected, and Foreman re-runs the e2e command itself regardless of what you claim.
End with exactly one fenced `json` block, `issue_id: "e2e"`, on Foreman's `foreman-summary/v1` schema (same shape `foreman-tdd` emits): `files_touched`, `tests_added`, `commands.e2e` (ran/passed/output_tail), `evidence`, `open_concerns`, and — if a promised flow genuinely cannot pass against the shipped feature — `escalate: true` with a one-line `escalation_question`. Set `escalate: false` when the flows pass. Nothing after the block.
A Boris-style agentic orchestrator TUI that supervises headless Claude Code agents through a gated software-delivery pipeline — pointed at any repository. plan → ADR/PRD → issues → TDD build → e2e Why Foreman?
Headless root-cause debugging loop for a Foreman worker whose tests, build, or acceptance check are failing — especially on a…
Headless grilling pass that challenges an approved implementation plan against the existing codebase and domain model, then…
Headless implementation-plan authoring for the Foreman planning stage. Explore the target repo first, then write a deep,…
Stack-agnostic test-driven development loop for a single Foreman issue.
Break an approved PRD into small, dependency-ordered, vertically-sliced implementation issues written as local files in the…
PRD template and authoring rules for Foreman. Synthesizes a PRD from the approved plan and the grilled decisions and writes it as…
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…