architect-analyze
Use when validating generated or refined architecture artifacts, before feature development, during architecture review, or…
Use when implemented work must be judged against its brief — severity-ranked findings plus one converge verdict of DONE, CONTINUE or SPEC_CORRECTION_NEEDED.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill mission-verify -a windsurf -y
name: mission-verify description: Use when implemented work must be judged against its brief — severity-ranked findings plus one converge verdict of DONE, CONTINUE or SPEC_CORRECTION_NEEDED.
**Requires:** the `factory-runbook` skill's shared executor contract at `.agents/skills/factory-runbook/references/executor.md` (installed path); install with `adlc-cli skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill factory-runbook`.
When `ADLC_RUN_ID` is not set, a person is in this session, and nothing else will answer a gate. The agentic-container runtime that relays gates to Slack exists only in a runner pod.
1. **A paused run is your turn, not the end of the mission.** When `adlc-cli workflow run` or `resume` exits with the run paused at a gate (`run_paused`, `status: paused` in `adlc-cli workflow state show <run_id>`), ask the person the gate's question and options. Then run `adlc-cli workflow resume <run_id> --input <verdict_input>=<answer>` and keep going. Never end your turn on a paused run that nobody was asked about. 2. **Every gate that approves MRs is followed by a step that opens them.** A `gate` whose message promises MRs/PRs is followed by a `publish` step: `run-branch.sh` and `open-mr.sh` for each repository the change touches, writing `mr_url` (`mr_urls` for more than one). Only then comes the write-back step, so the completion comment links real MRs. A gate with nothing after it to act on its answer is a plan defect; fix the plan before you start the run. 3. Before ending your turn, the run is `completed`, `failed` or aborted, or it is paused at a gate the person has been asked about.
`mission-verify` owns the verify phase of the mission SDD family: it judges the built work against the brief rather than the implementer's claims, emits severity-ranked findings, and returns one converge verdict. It works under the shared executor contract (`.agents/skills/factory-runbook/references/executor.md`): the `verify` step reads the `test` and `code` artifacts and emits `findings`, and the `converge` step reads `brief.md` and emits a `decision` — the judge is independent, so it checks the brief and non-goals rather than the verifier's own findings. It stops at the verdict — REVIEW and SHIP belong to `factory-review` and `factory-deploy`, which this skill never pre-empts.
1. Read the artifact refs produced by the `test` and `code` steps. 2. Judge against `brief.md`, not the implementer's claims — re-run the suite, inspect the diff, and confirm the non-goals are untouched. The converge judge works from the brief and non-goals, never from the verifier's own findings. 3. Emit severity-ranked findings as Critical, Important or Minor, each tied to evidence in the diff, the suite output or an untouched non-goal. 4. Return one converge verdict: `DONE` when the criteria are met and the quality threshold is reached, `CONTINUE` when in-scope gaps remain, `SPEC_CORRECTION_NEEDED` when a criterion is unmeasurable or the scope conflicts. 5. Route `SPEC_CORRECTION_NEEDED` to the owning clarify gate, never to code; return `CONTINUE` to the implementation phase with the findings attached. 6. Never approve or merge; approval and merge stay with the human and the deploy phase.
| Step | phase_type | output_type | reads_from | artifact | |---|---|---|---|---| | `verify` | verify | findings | `test`, `code` | — | | `converge` | verify | decision | `brief.md` | — |
This phase's gate is the **converge verdict** — a decision gate, not a mechanical red/green gate (the mechanical gates bind the build steps in `mission-implement`).
Agent skills that give coding agents your team's context at session start, so they stop working like strangers.
Use when validating generated or refined architecture artifacts, before feature development, during architecture review, or…
Use when architecture work starts or a tech-stack or pattern decision emerges — injects the project ADR index…
Use when ADRs need review, gaps need filling, or ADR status must be approved as Accepted before architecture generation.
Use when accepted ADRs exist and AD.md must be produced or updated as unified architecture documentation.
Use when bootstrapping architecture documentation for a brownfield project by reverse-engineering ADRs from an existing codebase.
Use when you want guided trade-off analysis, multi-option comparison, or structured architectural decision facilitation before…
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid…
Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or…
Converts books and documents (PDF, EPUB, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, plain text, RTF, MOBI/AZW with Calibre) into structured agent…
Set up the owner profile so a personal agent knows who it works for (first-run setup, \"get to know me\"), or distill colleague,…