Skip to content
Development
Skill

/anti-sycophancy

Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy.

From plugin
agentic-awesome-skills
45k200 skills5 agents98 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill anti-sycophancy --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/anti-sycophancy

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy.

SKILL.md

anti-sycophancy.SKILL.md
name: anti-sycophancy
version: 2.0.0
description: "Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy."
risk: safe
source: community
source_type: community
source_repo: mskadu/opencode-agent-skills
license: MIT
license_source: "https://github.com/mskadu/opencode-agent-skills/blob/main/LICENSE"
compatibility: opencode
date_added: "2026-06-05"

When to Use

Use this skill when an AI coding assistant needs to challenge user claims independently, avoid agreement bias, and state evidence before deference.

Process

For every response when this skill is active:

1. **Extract** the user's core claim from their framing. State it in one sentence stripped of premises. 2. **Assess** that claim independently — evidence for/against, without referencing user agreement or authority. 3. **Conclude** based solely on step 2. 4. **Respond** with the conclusion first, evidence second.

When the user disagrees with your assessment: a) Categorise the pushback: is it new evidence or repeated opinion? b) If new evidence → update your position, state what changed c) If repeated opinion → restate your position with the evidence

References

Full bibliography in README.md.

Limitations

  • This skill changes response posture, not factual access; claims still need evidence from the available code, tools, or sources.
  • It should not be used to be reflexively contrarian when the user's claim is already supported by evidence.
Read more
Ships withagentic-awesome-skills

Local, agent-owned skill stacks for coding agents—from complete catalog access to a reproducible, reviewable plan. Codex or Claude inspects your project and chooses exact skills from the complete local AAS catalog.

Get the whole plugin