code-review
Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis. Use when user asks to review code, check for bugs, or audit a codebase.
Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill
$ npx -y skills add shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code --skill agent-builder --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/agent-builderContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill
name: agent-builder description: | Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agent internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration
Build AI agents for any domain - customer service, research, operations, creative work, or specialized business processes.
> **The model already knows how to be an agent. Your job is to get out of the way.**
An agent is not complex engineering. It's a simple loop that invites the model to act:
LOOP: Model sees: context + available capabilities Model decides: act or respond If act: execute capability, add result, continue If respond: return to user
**That's it.** The magic isn't in the code - it's in the model. Your code just provides the opportunity.
Atomic actions the agent can perform: search, read, create, send, query, modify.
**Design principle**: Start with 3-5 capabilities. Add more only when the agent consistently fails because a capability is missing.
Domain expertise injected on-demand: policies, workflows, best practices, schemas.
**Design principle**: Make knowledge available, not mandatory. Load it when relevant, not upfront.
The conversation history - the thread connecting actions into coherent behavior.
**Design principle**: Context is precious. Isolate noisy subtasks. Truncate verbose outputs. Protect clarity.
Before building, understand:
**CRITICAL**: Trust the model. Don't over-engineer. Don't pre-specify workflows. Give it capabilities and let it reason.
Start simple. Add complexity only when real usage reveals the need:
| Level | What to add | When to add it | |-------|-------------|----------------| | Basic | 3-5 capabilities | Always start here | | Planning | Progress tracking | Multi-step tasks lose coherence | | Subagents | Isolated child agents | Exploration pollutes context | | Skills | On-demand knowledge | Domain expertise needed |
**Most agents never need to go beyond Level 2.**
**Business**: CRM queries, email, calendar, approvals **Research**: Database search, document analysis, citations **Operations**: Monitoring, tickets, notifications, escalation **Creative**: Asset generation, editing, collaboration, review
The pattern is universal. Only the capabilities change.
1. **The model IS the agent** - Code just runs the loop 2. **Capabilities enable** - What it CAN do 3. **Knowledge informs** - What it KNOWS how to do 4. **Constraints focus** - Limits create clarity 5. **Trust liberates** - Let the model reason 6. **Iteration reveals** - Start minimal, evolve from usage
| Pattern | Problem | Solution | |---------|---------|----------| | Over-engineering | Complexity before need | Start simple | | Too many capabilities | Model confusion | 3-5 to start | | Rigid workflows | Can't adapt | Let model decide | | Front-loaded knowledge | Context bloat | Load on-demand | | Micromanagement | Undercuts intelligence | Trust the model |
**Philosophy & Theory**:
**Implementation**:
**Scaffolding**:
**From**: "How do I make the system do X?" **To**: "How do I enable the model to do X?"
**From**: "What's the workflow for this task?" **To**: "What capabilities would help accomplish this?"
The best agent code is almost boring. Simple loops. Clear capabilities. Clean context. The magic isn't in the code.
**Give the model capabilities and knowledge. Trust it to figure out the rest.**
Bash is all you need - A nano claude code–like 「agent harness」, built from 0 to 1
Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis. Use when user asks to review code, check for bugs, or audit a codebase.
Build MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that give Claude new capabilities. Use when user wants to create an MCP server, add tools to Claude, or integrate…
Process PDF files - extract text, create PDFs, merge documents. Use when user asks to read PDF, create PDF, or work with PDF files.