/pm-roadmap
Сводит статус итерации, оценивает прогресс milestones, фиксирует изменения приоритетов, отслеживает зависимости и выдаёт roadmap в формате Now/Next/Later с атрибуцией задержек по 5 причинам, health score и фреймворком обрезки scope при нехватке ресурсов. User-invoked only — do
$ npx -y skills add serejaris/personal-corp-os --skill pm-roadmap --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/pm-roadmap
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Сводит статус итерации, оценивает прогресс milestones, фиксирует изменения приоритетов, отслеживает зависимости и выдаёт roadmap в формате Now/Next/Later с атрибуцией задержек по 5 причинам, health score и фреймворком обрезки scope при нехватке ресурсов. User-invoked only — do
SKILL.md
pm-roadmap.SKILL.mdname: pm-roadmap
description: Сводит статус итерации, оценивает прогресс milestones, фиксирует изменения приоритетов, отслеживает зависимости и выдаёт roadmap в формате Now/Next/Later с атрибуцией задержек по 5 причинам, health score и фреймворком обрезки scope при нехватке ресурсов. User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on /pm-roadmap, "обнови roadmap", "статус спринта", "анализ задержек", "update roadmap", "sprint status", "milestone progress", "delay analysis".
pm-roadmap — Roadmap update
Part of the Personal Corp framework — running a one-person business through AI agents. Aggregate current iteration status, evaluate milestone progress, track priority changes and dependencies, output a roadmap status overview and planning suggestions.
Inputs
| Field | Required | Notes | |---|---|---| | Iteration status | yes | Current Sprint task list and statuses (manual or pulled from PM tool) | | Roadmap horizon | no | Quarter / half / year; default quarter | | Changes | no | Items needing priority or timeline adjustment + reason | | Dependencies | no | Cross-team / tech dependencies and current state |
Step 1 — Get current state
If a PM tool integration is available, pull the current Sprint task list and bucket by status. Otherwise ask the user for the list in any format (table, screenshot, verbal).
Step 2 — Iteration status summary
| Field | Value | |---|---| | Sprint name / period | {Sprint X / date range} | | Planned tasks | {N} | | Done | {X} ({X/N%}) | | In progress | {Y} | | Not started | {Z} | | Blocked / delayed | {W} | | Estimated on-time delivery | {%} |
**Delayed-task analysis:**
| Task | Original due | New ETA | Reason | Milestone impact | |---|---|---|---|---| | {task} | {date} | {date} | {cause} | yes/no |
**Five-cause delay attribution:**
| Cause | Pattern | Improvement | |---|---|---| | **Scope change** | Mid-development requirement edits, scope creep | Strengthen requirement freeze; route changes through approval | | **Estimation gap** | Actual effort far exceeds estimate | Calibrate from history, add buffer | | **Tech risk** | Approach proves infeasible, perf wall, tech debt blocking | Pre-development tech-spike phase | | **Dependency block** | Waiting on another team / third party / approval | 2-week-ahead dependency early-warning | | **Headcount change** | PTO, attrition, redirected | 20% capacity buffer in planning |
If the same root cause appears 3+ times, escalate to a process-improvement item.
Step 3 — Milestone progress
| Milestone | Target date | Key deliverable | Progress | Status | Risks | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | {M1} | {date} | {deliverable} | {X%} | On-time / at-risk / delayed | {risk} |
**Status criteria:**
- **On-time:** progress ≥ time elapsed; no blocking deps
- **At-risk:** progress slightly behind, or unresolved dependency
- **Delayed:** progress significantly behind, or critical dependency blocked
Step 4 — Priority change log
| Item | Change | Old priority | New priority | Reason | Impact | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | {item} | Up / down / new / removed | {P0/P1/P2} | {P0/P1/P2} | {reason} | {scope} |
**Change-reason categories:**
- User-feedback driven (from `/pm-feedback`)
- Competitor driven (from `/pm-competitive`)
- Data driven (from `/pm-metrics`)
- Resource change (team capacity, tech approach change)
- External (compliance, partner ask)
Step 5 — Dependency tracking
| Dependency | Type | Owner / consumer | Need-by | State | Risk | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | {desc} | Tech / team / external | {who depends on whom} | {date} | Resolved / in progress / blocked | High / medium / low |
**Dependency types:**
- **Tech:** infrastructure, APIs, services
- **Cross-team:** other product lines, design, data team
- **External:** third-party services, partners, approval flows
Step 6 — Forward-looking plan
Recommend the next 2-3 iterations.
**Now / Next / Later view:**
| Horizon | Items | Priority | Confidence | Dependencies | |---|---|---|---|---| | **Now** (current iteration) | {in-flight work} | Locked | High | {resolved} | | **Next** (1-2 iterations out) | {planned work} | Locked / TBD | Medium-high | {to follow up} | | **Later** (3+ iterations out) | {directional plans} | Directional | Low-medium | {to evaluate} |
**Capacity assessment:**
- Available capacity next iteration: {X} person-days
- Allocation suggestion: 70% planned features + 20% tech debt + 10% buffer
- Given current delays, prioritize next: {list}
**Roadmap health score:**
| Dimension | Weight | Scoring | Score | |---|---|---|---| | On-time delivery rate | 30% | > 80% = 5, 60-80% = 3, < 60% = 1 | {X} | | Scope stability | 20% | Change < 10% = 5, 10-30% = 3, > 30% = 1 | {X} | | Dependency resolution | 20% | > 90% = 5, 70-90% = 3, < 70% = 1 | {X} | | OKR alignment | 15% | All work traces to OKR = 5 | {X} | | Team confidence | 15% | Team confident on timely delivery = 5 | {X} |
**Composite:** weighted total ≥ 4 healthy / 3-4 at-risk / < 3 needs urgent action.
**Feature-cut decision framework (when capacity is short):**
| Cut first | Reason | Condition | |---|---|---| | Nice-to-have | Doesn't affect core value | Cut directly | | Splittable feature's second half | MVP-first | Confirm MVP standalone usable | | Polish / perfectionism | Functional > perfect | No irreversible tech debt introduced | | Low-confidence requirements | Unvalidated hypotheses | Tag "deferred for validation" |
**Principle:** cut scope > delay > add people (Brooks's Law: adding people to a late project makes it later).
Step 7 — Output report
# Roadmap Update
**Date:** {date}
**Horizon:** {quarter / half}
**Current iteration:** {Sprint name / dates}
## 1. Current Iteration Status
Completion rate: {X%} ({done}/{total})
Blockers: {N}
## 2. Milestone Progress
| Milestone | Target | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
## 3. Priority Changes
| Item | Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
## 4. Dependencies & Risks
- High-risk dependencies: {desRead more
name: pm-roadmap description: Сводит статус итерации, оценивает прогресс milestones, фиксирует изменения приоритетов, отслеживает зависимости и выдаёт roadmap в формате Now/Next/Later с атрибуцией задержек по 5 причинам, health score и фреймворком обрезки scope при нехватке ресурсов. User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on /pm-roadmap, "обнови roadmap", "статус спринта", "анализ задержек", "update roadmap", "sprint status", "milestone progress", "delay analysis".
pm-roadmap — Roadmap update
Part of the Personal Corp framework — running a one-person business through AI agents. Aggregate current iteration status, evaluate milestone progress, track priority changes and dependencies, output a roadmap status overview and planning suggestions.
Inputs
| Field | Required | Notes | |---|---|---| | Iteration status | yes | Current Sprint task list and statuses (manual or pulled from PM tool) | | Roadmap horizon | no | Quarter / half / year; default quarter | | Changes | no | Items needing priority or timeline adjustment + reason | | Dependencies | no | Cross-team / tech dependencies and current state |
Step 1 — Get current state
If a PM tool integration is available, pull the current Sprint task list and bucket by status. Otherwise ask the user for the list in any format (table, screenshot, verbal).
Step 2 — Iteration status summary
| Field | Value | |---|---| | Sprint name / period | {Sprint X / date range} | | Planned tasks | {N} | | Done | {X} ({X/N%}) | | In progress | {Y} | | Not started | {Z} | | Blocked / delayed | {W} | | Estimated on-time delivery | {%} |
**Delayed-task analysis:**
| Task | Original due | New ETA | Reason | Milestone impact | |---|---|---|---|---| | {task} | {date} | {date} | {cause} | yes/no |
**Five-cause delay attribution:**
| Cause | Pattern | Improvement | |---|---|---| | **Scope change** | Mid-development requirement edits, scope creep | Strengthen requirement freeze; route changes through approval | | **Estimation gap** | Actual effort far exceeds estimate | Calibrate from history, add buffer | | **Tech risk** | Approach proves infeasible, perf wall, tech debt blocking | Pre-development tech-spike phase | | **Dependency block** | Waiting on another team / third party / approval | 2-week-ahead dependency early-warning | | **Headcount change** | PTO, attrition, redirected | 20% capacity buffer in planning |
If the same root cause appears 3+ times, escalate to a process-improvement item.
Step 3 — Milestone progress
| Milestone | Target date | Key deliverable | Progress | Status | Risks | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | {M1} | {date} | {deliverable} | {X%} | On-time / at-risk / delayed | {risk} |
**Status criteria:**
- **On-time:** progress ≥ time elapsed; no blocking deps
- **At-risk:** progress slightly behind, or unresolved dependency
- **Delayed:** progress significantly behind, or critical dependency blocked
Step 4 — Priority change log
| Item | Change | Old priority | New priority | Reason | Impact | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | {item} | Up / down / new / removed | {P0/P1/P2} | {P0/P1/P2} | {reason} | {scope} |
**Change-reason categories:**
- User-feedback driven (from `/pm-feedback`)
- Competitor driven (from `/pm-competitive`)
- Data driven (from `/pm-metrics`)
- Resource change (team capacity, tech approach change)
- External (compliance, partner ask)
Step 5 — Dependency tracking
| Dependency | Type | Owner / consumer | Need-by | State | Risk | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | {desc} | Tech / team / external | {who depends on whom} | {date} | Resolved / in progress / blocked | High / medium / low |
**Dependency types:**
- **Tech:** infrastructure, APIs, services
- **Cross-team:** other product lines, design, data team
- **External:** third-party services, partners, approval flows
Step 6 — Forward-looking plan
Recommend the next 2-3 iterations.
**Now / Next / Later view:**
| Horizon | Items | Priority | Confidence | Dependencies | |---|---|---|---|---| | **Now** (current iteration) | {in-flight work} | Locked | High | {resolved} | | **Next** (1-2 iterations out) | {planned work} | Locked / TBD | Medium-high | {to follow up} | | **Later** (3+ iterations out) | {directional plans} | Directional | Low-medium | {to evaluate} |
**Capacity assessment:**
- Available capacity next iteration: {X} person-days
- Allocation suggestion: 70% planned features + 20% tech debt + 10% buffer
- Given current delays, prioritize next: {list}
**Roadmap health score:**
| Dimension | Weight | Scoring | Score | |---|---|---|---| | On-time delivery rate | 30% | > 80% = 5, 60-80% = 3, < 60% = 1 | {X} | | Scope stability | 20% | Change < 10% = 5, 10-30% = 3, > 30% = 1 | {X} | | Dependency resolution | 20% | > 90% = 5, 70-90% = 3, < 70% = 1 | {X} | | OKR alignment | 15% | All work traces to OKR = 5 | {X} | | Team confidence | 15% | Team confident on timely delivery = 5 | {X} |
**Composite:** weighted total ≥ 4 healthy / 3-4 at-risk / < 3 needs urgent action.
**Feature-cut decision framework (when capacity is short):**
| Cut first | Reason | Condition | |---|---|---| | Nice-to-have | Doesn't affect core value | Cut directly | | Splittable feature's second half | MVP-first | Confirm MVP standalone usable | | Polish / perfectionism | Functional > perfect | No irreversible tech debt introduced | | Low-confidence requirements | Unvalidated hypotheses | Tag "deferred for validation" |
**Principle:** cut scope > delay > add people (Brooks's Law: adding people to a late project makes it later).
Step 7 — Output report
# Roadmap Update
**Date:** {date}
**Horizon:** {quarter / half}
**Current iteration:** {Sprint name / dates}
## 1. Current Iteration Status
Completion rate: {X%} ({done}/{total})
Blockers: {N}
## 2. Milestone Progress
| Milestone | Target | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
## 3. Priority Changes
| Item | Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
## 4. Dependencies & Risks
- High-risk dependencies: {desPersonal Corp is a way to run a one-person company through AI agents: tasks out of your head, departments instead of one person's memory, a weekly retro instead of "I'll sort it out someday".
Other skills on personal-corp-os.
- /paperclip-api
Use when managing Paperclip AI agent companies - creating tasks, managing agents, approving hires, running heartbeats, or any Paperclip control-plane operations via CLI or REST API. Triggers on "paperclip", "задача агенту", "одобри найм", "heartbeat", "запусти агента".
Open skill - /art-director
Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.
Open skill - /cc-analytics
Use when user asks for Claude Code usage stats, weekly analytics, project activity summary, or wants to see what projects were worked on. Triggers on "аналитика", "статистика claude", "cc stats", "weekly report", "что делал
Open skill - /ceo-council
Use when needing strategic project analysis from multiple independent expert perspectives. Triggers on business decisions, growth strategy, product direction, competitive analysis, or any situation where diverse C-level opinions reduce blind spots
Open skill - /claude-md-writer
Use when creating or refactoring CLAUDE.md files - enforces best practices for size, structure, and content organization
Open skill - /corp-doctor
Use when a Personal Corp operating loop needs setup, repair, a new department, or task routing: HQ files and agent rules, GitHub issue workflow, corp-* owner map, department repositories, or deciding which repo an issue belongs to. Triggers: "corp doctor", "почини контур",
Open skill

