/omh-executor-runtime-readiness

name: "omh-executor-runtime-readiness"
description: "[omh] Unsure whether Codex or Claude Code is ready: executor runtime readiness - compare Codex, Claude Code, Hermes coding, and oh-my runtimes by tools and handoff mode; use external-connector-readiness for a named plugin or API, and toolbelt-readiness for the whole capability inventory. Use when the user says: executor-runtime-readiness, executor readiness, runtime readiness, codex readiness, claude code readiness, hermes coding readiness, executor tools, missing tools."
metadata:
  hermes:
    tags: [workflow, oh-my-hermes, executor-readiness]
    category: executor-readiness
    phase: runtime-selection
    role: handoff-guide
    quality_tier: workflow-surface-gated

Executor Runtime Readiness

This is a Hermes-native `executor-runtime-readiness` workflow skill.

Why This Exists

`executor-runtime-readiness` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and get a structured, checkable answer instead of an improvised one.

Do Not Use When

• The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
• The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
• The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.

Examples

Good example:

• Prompt: executor-runtime-readiness can this task run in Codex, Claude Code, or Hermes coding?
• Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_executor_runtime_readiness` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
• Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.

Bad example:

• Prompt: executor-runtime-readiness claim Codex already started the session.
• Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
• Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.

Completion Checklist

• The selected coding or runtime owner is named before any implementation claim.
• Prepared handoff, dispatch, execution, verification, review, CI, and merge states are separated.
• The final status cites observed runtime evidence or keeps the work prepared_not_observed.
• When Hermes is the selected coding owner, use `hermes_coding_harness/v1` to keep builder, verifier, reviewer, docs, and PR lanes separate.
• Report the current harness stage, owner, next action, and missing evidence without claiming PR creation, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge until matching runtime observations exist.

Recovery Notes

• If the selected executor is unavailable, ask for Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or another runtime before retrying.
• If dispatch or result evidence is missing, keep the handoff prepared_not_observed and expose the next observable action.

Workflow Lane

• Current lane: **Coding handoff** (`idea-to-deploy`, `llm-app-dev`, `cto-loop`, `deploy-and-monitor`, `code-review`, `build-failure-triage`, `verification-gate`, `security-safety-review`, `+28 more`) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
• If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
• Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.

Use When

Use when a user may choose Codex, Claude Code, Hermes coding, or another runtime and needs tool/credential gaps before handoff.

Strong routing signals: `executor-runtime-readiness`, `executor readiness`, `runtime readiness`, `codex readiness`, `claude code readiness`, `hermes coding readiness`, `executor tools`, `missing tools`, `missing runtime tools`, `runtime tools`, `coding agent readiness`, `coding runtime`, `handoff mode`, `handoff readiness`, `codex or claude`, `codex vs claude`, `codex tools`, `claude code tools`, `hermes coding`, `agent runtime`, `subagent readiness`, `worktree readiness`, `runtime migration`, `omx`, `omc`, `omo`, `codex로 넘길지 claude`, `claude code로 넘길지 codex`, `codex랑 claude`, `claude code 중`, `넘길지 codex`, `넘길지 claude`, `코덱스`, `클로드 코드`, `헤르메스 코딩`, `코딩 에이전트`, `서브에이전트`, `작업트리`, `준비성`, `실행 런타임`, `어떤 런타임`, `런타임으로 넘겨`

Catalog Metadata

Category: `executor-readiness` Phase: `runtime-selection` Hermes role: `handoff-guide` Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated` Reasoning demand: `light`

Quality bar:

• Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
• Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
• Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.

Handoff policy:

Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.

Executor readiness:

• When accepted work mutates code, check `executor_readiness/v1` for the selected Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, or oh-my runtime path before first dispatch.
• If readiness is `missing` or `blocked`, ask the user to choose another coding agent, configure PATH, continue in Hermes, or keep a prompt/runtime handoff; retry only after that state changes.
• A readiness probe is not dispatch, implementation, verification, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

Delegation transparency:

• When delegating, show the composed delegate prompt in a fenced code block in the status message; truncate a long prompt to a bounded preview ending with `... [truncated, N chars total]` — the user must see WHAT was asked, not just that something was.
• Name every delegated or parallel lane's model and, when the host exposes it, its reasoning effort inline as `(model effort)` in status and briefing lines — including runtime-native subagents; when no effort is exposed, show the model alone as `(model)` rather than writing a placeho