Skip to content
Testing
Skill

/context-driven-testing

Apply context-driven testing principles where practices are chosen based on project context, not universal 'best practices'. Use when making testing decisions, questioning dogma, or adapting approaches to specific project needs.

From plugin
agentic-qe
436200 skills169 agents149 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill context-driven-testing --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/context-driven-testing

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Apply context-driven testing principles where practices are chosen based on project context, not universal 'best practices'. Use when making testing decisions, questioning dogma, or adapting approaches to specific project needs.

SKILL.md

context-driven-testing.SKILL.md
name: context-driven-testing
description: "Apply context-driven testing principles where practices are chosen based on project context, not universal 'best practices'. Use when making testing decisions, questioning dogma, or adapting approaches to specific project needs."
category: testing-methodologies
priority: high
tokenEstimate: 1100
agents: [qe-fleet-commander, qe-regression-risk-analyzer, qe-requirements-validator, qe-quality-analyzer]
implementation_status: optimized
optimization_version: 1.0
last_optimized: 2025-12-02
dependencies: []
quick_reference_card: true
tags: [context-driven, rst, exploratory, heuristics, oracles, skilled-testing]
trust_tier: 0
validation:

Context-Driven Testing

<default_to_action> When making testing decisions or adapting approaches: 1. ANALYZE context: project goals, constraints, risks, team skills 2. QUESTION practices: "Why this? What risk does it address? What's the cost?" 3. INVESTIGATE not just check: Does software solve the problem, or create new ones? 4. ADAPT approach based on context, not "best practices" 5. DOCUMENT discoveries, not pre-written plans

**Quick Context Analysis:**

  • Mission: "Find important problems fast enough to matter" (not "execute test cases")
  • Risk: Safety-critical = high rigor; internal tool = lighter touch
  • Constraints: Startup with tight timeline ≠ enterprise with compliance
  • Skills: Novice needs structure; expert adapts intuitively

**Critical Success Factors:**

  • No "best practices" work everywhere - only good practices in context
  • Testing is investigation, not script execution
  • Context changes; your approach should too

</default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Making testing decisions for new project
  • Questioning "that's how it's done" dogma
  • Adapting approach to specific constraints
  • Exploratory testing sessions

RST Heuristics

| Heuristic | Application | |-----------|-------------| | **SFDIPOT** | Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, Time | | **Oracles** | Consistency with history, similar products, expectations, docs | | **Tours** | Business District, Historical, Bad Neighborhood, Tourist, Museum |

---

Context-Driven Decisions

Example: Test Automation Level

**Startup Context:**

  • Small team, rapid changes, unclear product-market fit
  • **Decision:** Light automation on critical paths, heavy exploratory
  • **Rationale:** Requirements change too fast for extensive automation

**Enterprise Context:**

  • Stable features, regulatory requirements, large team
  • **Decision:** Comprehensive automated regression suite
  • **Rationale:** Stability allows automation investment to pay off

Example: Documentation

**Regulated (FDA/medical):**

  • **Decision:** Detailed test protocols, traceability matrices
  • **Rationale:** Regulatory compliance isn't optional

**Fast-paced startup:**

  • **Decision:** Lightweight session notes, risk logs
  • **Rationale:** Bureaucracy slows more than it helps

---

Agent-Assisted Context-Driven Testing

// Agent analyzes context and recommends approach
const context = await Task("Analyze Context", {
  project: 'e-commerce-platform',
  stage: 'startup',
  constraints: ['timeline: tight', 'budget: limited'],
  risks: ['payment-security', 'high-volume']
}, "qe-fleet-commander");

// Context-aware agent selection
// - qe-security-scanner (critical risk)
// - qe-performance-tester (high volume)
// - Skip: qe-visual-tester (low priority in startup context)

// Adaptive testing strategy
await Task("Generate Tests", {
  context: 'startup',
  focus: 'critical-paths-only',
  depth: 'smoke-tests',
  automation: 'minimal'
}, "qe-test-generator");

---

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/context-driven/
├── context-analysis/*    - Project context snapshots
├── decisions/*           - Testing decisions with rationale
├── discoveries/*         - What was learned during testing
└── adaptations/*         - How approach changed over time

Fleet Coordination

const contextFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'context-driven',
  context: {
    type: 'greenfield-saas',
    stage: 'growth',
    compliance: 'gdpr-only'
  },
  agents: ['qe-test-generator', 'qe-security-scanner', 'qe-performance-tester'],
  exclude: ['qe-visual-tester', 'qe-requirements-validator']  // Not priority
});

---

Practical Tips

1. **Start with risk assessment** - List features, ask: How likely to fail? How bad? How hard to test? 2. **Time-box exploration** - 2 hours checkout, 30 min error handling, 15 min per browser 3. **Document discoveries** - Not "Enter invalid email, verify error" but "Payment API returns 500 instead of 400, no user-visible error. Bug filed." 4. **Talk to humans** - Developers, users, support, product 5. **Pair with others** - Different perspectives = different bugs

---

Related Skills

  • [agentic-quality-engineering](../agentic-quality-engineering/) - Context-aware agent selection
  • [holistic-testing-pact](../holistic-testing-pact/) - Adapt holistic model to context
  • [risk-based-testing](../risk-based-testing/) - Context affects risk assessment
  • [exploratory-testing-advanced](../exploratory-testing-advanced/) - RST techniques

---

Remember

**With Agents:** Agents analyze context, adapt strategies, and learn what works in your situation. Use agents to scale context-driven thinking while maintaining human judgment for critical decisions.

Read more
Ships withagentic-qe

AI-powered quality engineering agents that generate tests, find coverage gaps, detect flaky tests, and learn your codebase patterns — across 11 coding agent platforms.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on agentic-qe.