/measure-experiment-results

name: measure-experiment-results
description: Documents the results of a completed experiment or A/B test with statistical analysis, learnings, and recommendations. Use after experiments conclude to communicate findings, inform decisions, and build organizational knowledge.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  phase: measure
  version: "2.1.0"
  updated: 2026-06-10
  category: reflection
  frameworks: [triple-diamond, lean-startup, design-thinking]
  author: product-on-purpose

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Experiment Results

An experiment results document captures what happened when you tested a hypothesis, including statistical outcomes, segment analysis, learnings, and clear recommendations. Good results documentation turns individual experiments into organizational knowledge that improves future decision-making.

When to Use

• After an A/B test or experiment reaches statistical significance
• When an experiment is ended early (for any reason)
• To communicate findings to stakeholders who weren't involved
• During decision-making about whether to ship, iterate, or kill a feature
• To build a repository of learnings that inform future experiments

When NOT to Use

• The experiment is not designed or run yet -> use `measure-experiment-design`
• The results demand a direction decision -> use `iterate-pivot-decision`; this skill reports the evidence, that one decides
• You want the transferable learning banked for the organization -> follow up with `iterate-lessons-log`
• Your data is survey responses, not a controlled experiment -> use `measure-survey-analysis`

Instructions

When asked to document experiment results, follow these steps:

1. **Summarize the Experiment** Provide context: what was tested, when it ran, how much traffic it received. Link to the original experiment design document if one exists.

2. **Restate the Hypothesis** Remind readers what you believed would happen and why. This frames the results interpretation.

3. **Present Primary Results** Show the primary metric outcome clearly: what were the values for control and treatment? Include statistical significance (p-value), confidence intervals, and sample sizes. Be honest about whether results are conclusive.

4. **Analyze Secondary Metrics** Present guardrail metrics that ensure you didn't cause unintended harm. Note any secondary metrics that moved unexpectedly.both positive and negative.

5. **Segment the Data** Look for differential effects across user segments (platform, tenure, plan type, etc.). Sometimes overall results mask important segment-level insights.

6. **Extract Learnings** What did you learn beyond the numbers? Include surprising findings, questions raised, and implications for the product hypothesis. Negative results are valuable learnings.

7. **Make a Recommendation** Be clear: should we ship, iterate, or kill? Support the recommendation with the evidence. If the decision is nuanced, explain the trade-offs.

8. **Define Next Steps** Specify what happens now.engineering work to ship, follow-up experiments, metrics to continue monitoring, or documentation to update.

Output Format

Use the template in `references/TEMPLATE.md` to structure the output. A complete readout fills every template section: Summary; Hypothesis Recap; Results; Segment Analysis; Visualization; Learnings; Recommendation; Next Steps; and Appendix.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

• [ ] Statistical methods and significance are clearly stated
• [ ] Confidence intervals are included (not just p-values)
• [ ] Segment analysis checked for differential effects
• [ ] Secondary/guardrail metrics are reported
• [ ] Learnings go beyond just the numbers
• [ ] Recommendation is clear and actionable
• [ ] Negative or inconclusive results are reported honestly

Examples

See `references/EXAMPLE.md` for a completed example.