adversarial-squad
Deploy a bounded, profile-loaded adversarial review squad at a mission point-cut so independent doctrine lenses converge on…
Standalone Spec Kitty governance invocation: run Spec Kitty when the user indicates they want Spec Kitty involved, load governance context, open an Op, do the work under that context, and close the Op with the real outcome. Documents dispatch, profiles list, invocations list,
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add spec-kitty/spec-kitty --skill spec-kitty -a windsurf -y
name: spec-kitty description: >- Standalone Spec Kitty governance invocation: run Spec Kitty when the user indicates they want Spec Kitty involved, load governance context, open an Op, do the work under that context, and close the Op with the real outcome. Documents dispatch, profiles list, invocations list, and profile-invocation complete. Triggers: "use spec kitty to", "hey spec kitty", "spec kitty <anything>", ad-hoc requests that are not part of a running full mission workflow.
Use this skill when the user seems to want Spec Kitty involved and the request is not clearly a full mission workflow.
Spec Kitty does not spawn another LLM. You are the host. Spec Kitty routes the request, assembles governance context, opens an Op record, and returns. You then do the work under that governance context and close the Op with the real outcome.
If the user says anything like "use spec kitty to ...", "hey spec kitty ...", "spec kitty fix ...", or "spec kitty <anything>", treat it as a standalone governed invocation unless they clearly ask for a full mission.
Run:
spec-kitty dispatch "<request verbatim>" --json
If the user names a specific profile, or you have a strong reason to bypass routing, pass it explicitly:
spec-kitty dispatch "<request verbatim>" --profile <profile-id> --json
Do not answer directly before dispatching. The point is to load governance and record the Op before doing the work.
When the user asks to show, explain, compare, map, or visualize the governed work—or when dense prose hides its structure—also load `spk-practice-show-me`. Use its smallest-useful-visual rule while keeping the dispatch lifecycle here authoritative.
Every standalone invocation follows the same three-step lifecycle:
1. **Open** — `spec-kitty dispatch` opens the Op and loads governance context. It does not do the work and it does not close the Op. 2. **Work** — read `governance_context_text` and do the work under that binding context. 3. **Close** — close the Op with the real outcome:
spec-kitty profile-invocation complete \
--invocation-id <id> \
--outcome <done|failed|abandoned> [--evidence <path>]Failed work closes as `failed`; dropped work closes as `abandoned`. Never leave an Op open deliberately. `spec-kitty doctor ops` reports orphaned open Ops, and `spec-kitty doctor ops --close-stale` sweeps stale ones closed as `abandoned` with `closed_by: doctor_sweep`.
spec-kitty profiles list --json
Profiles are an optional routing escape hatch, not the primary UX.
spec-kitty dispatch "implement WP03" --json spec-kitty dispatch "review this migration" --profile reviewer --json
Response fields:
| Field | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | `invocation_id` | string (ULID) | Unique ID for this Op | | `profile_id` | string | Resolved profile identifier | | `action` | string | Normalised action string | | `governance_context_text` | string or null | Full governance context assembled from the project DRG; `null` in `--brief` mode | | `governance_context_hash` | string | SHA-256 hash of `governance_context_text` | | `governance_context_available` | boolean | `false` when charter has not been synthesised | | `governance_context_reference` | object, `--brief` only | Digest, size, line count and fetch command standing in for the omitted text | | `router_confidence` | string or null | Routing confidence score | | `status` | `"open"` | The Op is open until you close it | | `close_contract` | object | Exact close command, accepted outcomes, and flags |
After calling `dispatch`, the response includes `governance_context_text`.
You must inject this text into your working context before executing the task.
Steps: 1. Read `governance_context_text` from the JSON response. 2. Add the text to the beginning of your task execution context. Treat it as binding governance: follow any directives, constraints, and guidelines it contains when generating code, plans, or analyses. 3. If `governance_context_available` is `false`, note it to the user ("governance context unavailable — run `spec-kitty charter synthesize` to build the DRG") but proceed with the task. The Op trail is still recorded. 4. After completing the work, close the Op.
The payload is ~13-26 KB and nearly all of it is unchanged between two dispatches of the same profile and action. Once this session has read the full text, re-dispatch with `--brief`: the response keeps the routing fields, sets `governance_context_text` to `null`, and returns `governance_context_reference` — a digest, the size, and the command that fetches the text again:
spec-kitty dispatch "review the migration" --profile reviewer-renata --brief --json # governance_context_reference.fetch_command: # spec-kitty charter context --action review --profile reviewer-renata --json --no-mark-loaded
Rules that keep briefing honest:
(or the fetch command's `text` field). `--brief` is for re-reads, not for skipping governance: dispatch still assembles the context on every call, and never suppresses it on its own.
reproduces it; fetching must not change first-load state, hence `--no-mark-loaded`.
charter, DRG or profile changes made after dispatch can change it. Compare the first 16 hex characters of the SHA-256 of the fetched `text` with `digest`; on a mismatch, discard it and re-dispatch without `--brief`.
Spec-Driven Development with organizational governance. Specs tell AI agents what to build; Charter governs how they build it. Git-native missions, enforceable workflows, and consistent engineering standards across AI coding agents and harnesses.
Deploy a bounded, profile-loaded adversarial review squad at a mission point-cut so independent doctrine lenses converge on…
Understand how Spec Kitty manages git: what git operations Python handles automatically, what agents must do manually, worktree…
Orchestrate the implement-review loop for Spec Kitty work packages using any configured agent. Covers agent dispatch, state…
Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift,…
Understand how Spec Kitty missions work: the 4 built-in mission types, how they define workflows via step contracts and action…
Teach agents and external systems how to use spec-kitty orchestrator-api to drive workflows from outside the host CLI. Triggers:…
Use your assigned AgentMail inbox to read email tasks, explicitly send or reply, and check delivery. Provided automatically by…
Create a new Architecture Decision Record with sequential numbering and AgentDB registration