checking-member-access
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what someone can see or edit, who can…
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill feature-usage-feed --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/feature-usage-feedContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what
name: feature-usage-feed description: > Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).
Some PostHog features (group session summaries, single session summaries, replay AI search, error tracking AI debug, etc.) generate hundreds or thousands of LLM traces per week. Reading them by hand is not feasible. This skill covers the end-to-end pattern for turning that trace volume into a live Slack feed of canonical use cases — what users are actually doing with the feature.
The workflow is **mixed, and leans UI**. Trace inspection and filter discovery (steps 1-2) are MCP-driven. Eval creation, dry-running, and enabling (steps 4-5) are MCP-driven _when_ `posthog:llma-evaluation-*` tools are exposed to your agent — but they often aren't, in which case fall back to the UI (Data pipeline → destinations for the alert is always UI). Each step flags its UI fallback. Expect to finish in the UI even when you start from chat.
If the user just wants to debug a single trace or tune an existing eval, redirect to `exploring-llm-traces` or `exploring-llm-evaluations` instead.
This skill supports two different ways to scope an eval to "the feature you care about":
**Pattern A — Feature-native trace_id prefix.** For standalone features that emit their own `$ai_trace_id` pattern (e.g. `session-summary:group:`, `replay-search:`, error-tracking-specific flows). Filter on the prefix.
**Pattern B — PostHog AI agent mode.** For features the user interacts with _via_ PostHog AI in a specific agent mode (error tracking, product analytics, session replay, SQL, flags, surveys, AI observability). Filter on `ai_product = 'posthog_ai' AND agent_mode = '<mode>'`. This requires PR #55160 (merged April 2026) to be deployed, which threads `agent_mode` and `supermode` onto every `$ai_generation` emitted by the chat agent loop. A useful ergonomic side-effect: `agent_mode IS NOT NULL` is a reliable "user-facing chat turn" filter — batch jobs and tool-internal LLM calls go through different code paths and have `agent_mode=null`, so they're excluded for free.
If the user asks "what are users trying to DO in [ET / replay / SQL / flags / surveys] mode of PostHog AI", that's Pattern B. If they ask "what use cases does [standalone feature] cover", that's Pattern A. Pick the pattern first — the prompt, filter, and Slack channel naming all follow from it.
| Requirement | How to verify | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | (Pattern A) Feature emits `$ai_generation` events with a stable `$ai_trace_id` pattern | `posthog:execute-sql` for distinct `$ai_trace_id` prefixes | | (Pattern B) `agent_mode` property is present on recent `$ai_generation` events | `posthog:execute-sql` group-by `properties.agent_mode` on recent `ai_product='posthog_ai'` events. Null bucket is normal (batch jobs + tool-internal calls) — you want non-null coverage across the modes you care about. | | `$session_id` is attached to the `$ai_generation` events (links trace to trigger session) | `posthog:execute-sql` for `countIf($session_id IS NOT NULL) / count()` | | `$session_id` is also attached to the `$ai_evaluation` events (lets the Slack alert link to the session) | Same query but on `$ai_evaluation` events after the eval has run once | | User has organisation-level AI data processing approval | Required for `llm_judge` evaluations |
If `$session_id` is missing on either event type, file a backend fix before continuing — there is no UI workaround. The session-summary feature has a worked example of the threading pattern in PR #54952. For Pattern B, the agent-mode threading pattern is in PR #55160.
| Tool
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what someone can see or edit, who can…
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user…
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants…
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand…
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into…
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost…