/feature-usage-feed
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill feature-usage-feed --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/feature-usage-feed
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what
SKILL.md
feature-usage-feed.SKILL.mdname: feature-usage-feed
description: >
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a
PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a
live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually
using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're
investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what
patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes
the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with
`$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard
setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).
Building a feature usage feed via LLM evals
Some PostHog features (group session summaries, single session summaries, replay AI search, error tracking AI debug, etc.) generate hundreds or thousands of LLM traces per week. Reading them by hand is not feasible. This skill covers the end-to-end pattern for turning that trace volume into a live Slack feed of canonical use cases — what users are actually doing with the feature.
The workflow is **mixed, and leans UI**. Trace inspection and filter discovery (steps 1-2) are MCP-driven. Eval creation, dry-running, and enabling (steps 4-5) are MCP-driven _when_ `posthog:llma-evaluation-*` tools are exposed to your agent — but they often aren't, in which case fall back to the UI (Data pipeline → destinations for the alert is always UI). Each step flags its UI fallback. Expect to finish in the UI even when you start from chat.
When to use
- "How are people actually using [feature X] in production?"
- "Can we identify the canonical use cases for [feature X] so we can write better docs / prioritize improvements?"
- "I want a Slack feed of representative usage examples without manually skimming traces."
- "Set up a feed of use cases for [feature X] in #team-[area]-usage."
If the user just wants to debug a single trace or tune an existing eval, redirect to `exploring-llm-traces` or `exploring-llm-evaluations` instead.
Two filter patterns
This skill supports two different ways to scope an eval to "the feature you care about":
**Pattern A — Feature-native trace_id prefix.** For standalone features that emit their own `$ai_trace_id` pattern (e.g. `session-summary:group:`, `replay-search:`, error-tracking-specific flows). Filter on the prefix.
**Pattern B — PostHog AI agent mode.** For features the user interacts with _via_ PostHog AI in a specific agent mode (error tracking, product analytics, session replay, SQL, flags, surveys, AI observability). Filter on `ai_product = 'posthog_ai' AND agent_mode = '<mode>'`. This requires PR #55160 (merged April 2026) to be deployed, which threads `agent_mode` and `supermode` onto every `$ai_generation` emitted by the chat agent loop. A useful ergonomic side-effect: `agent_mode IS NOT NULL` is a reliable "user-facing chat turn" filter — batch jobs and tool-internal LLM calls go through different code paths and have `agent_mode=null`, so they're excluded for free.
If the user asks "what are users trying to DO in [ET / replay / SQL / flags / surveys] mode of PostHog AI", that's Pattern B. If they ask "what use cases does [standalone feature] cover", that's Pattern A. Pick the pattern first — the prompt, filter, and Slack channel naming all follow from it.
Prerequisites
| Requirement | How to verify | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | (Pattern A) Feature emits `$ai_generation` events with a stable `$ai_trace_id` pattern | `posthog:execute-sql` for distinct `$ai_trace_id` prefixes | | (Pattern B) `agent_mode` property is present on recent `$ai_generation` events | `posthog:execute-sql` group-by `properties.agent_mode` on recent `ai_product='posthog_ai'` events. Null bucket is normal (batch jobs + tool-internal calls) — you want non-null coverage across the modes you care about. | | `$session_id` is attached to the `$ai_generation` events (links trace to trigger session) | `posthog:execute-sql` for `countIf($session_id IS NOT NULL) / count()` | | `$session_id` is also attached to the `$ai_evaluation` events (lets the Slack alert link to the session) | Same query but on `$ai_evaluation` events after the eval has run once | | User has organisation-level AI data processing approval | Required for `llm_judge` evaluations and the eval summary tool |
If `$session_id` is missing on either event type, file a backend fix before continuing — there is no UI workaround. The session-summary feature has a worked example of the threading pattern in PR #54952. For Pattern B, the agent-mode threading pattern is in PR #55160.
Tools
| Tool
Read more
name: feature-usage-feed description: > Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).
Building a feature usage feed via LLM evals
Some PostHog features (group session summaries, single session summaries, replay AI search, error tracking AI debug, etc.) generate hundreds or thousands of LLM traces per week. Reading them by hand is not feasible. This skill covers the end-to-end pattern for turning that trace volume into a live Slack feed of canonical use cases — what users are actually doing with the feature.
The workflow is **mixed, and leans UI**. Trace inspection and filter discovery (steps 1-2) are MCP-driven. Eval creation, dry-running, and enabling (steps 4-5) are MCP-driven _when_ `posthog:llma-evaluation-*` tools are exposed to your agent — but they often aren't, in which case fall back to the UI (Data pipeline → destinations for the alert is always UI). Each step flags its UI fallback. Expect to finish in the UI even when you start from chat.
When to use
- "How are people actually using [feature X] in production?"
- "Can we identify the canonical use cases for [feature X] so we can write better docs / prioritize improvements?"
- "I want a Slack feed of representative usage examples without manually skimming traces."
- "Set up a feed of use cases for [feature X] in #team-[area]-usage."
If the user just wants to debug a single trace or tune an existing eval, redirect to `exploring-llm-traces` or `exploring-llm-evaluations` instead.
Two filter patterns
This skill supports two different ways to scope an eval to "the feature you care about":
**Pattern A — Feature-native trace_id prefix.** For standalone features that emit their own `$ai_trace_id` pattern (e.g. `session-summary:group:`, `replay-search:`, error-tracking-specific flows). Filter on the prefix.
**Pattern B — PostHog AI agent mode.** For features the user interacts with _via_ PostHog AI in a specific agent mode (error tracking, product analytics, session replay, SQL, flags, surveys, AI observability). Filter on `ai_product = 'posthog_ai' AND agent_mode = '<mode>'`. This requires PR #55160 (merged April 2026) to be deployed, which threads `agent_mode` and `supermode` onto every `$ai_generation` emitted by the chat agent loop. A useful ergonomic side-effect: `agent_mode IS NOT NULL` is a reliable "user-facing chat turn" filter — batch jobs and tool-internal LLM calls go through different code paths and have `agent_mode=null`, so they're excluded for free.
If the user asks "what are users trying to DO in [ET / replay / SQL / flags / surveys] mode of PostHog AI", that's Pattern B. If they ask "what use cases does [standalone feature] cover", that's Pattern A. Pick the pattern first — the prompt, filter, and Slack channel naming all follow from it.
Prerequisites
| Requirement | How to verify | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | (Pattern A) Feature emits `$ai_generation` events with a stable `$ai_trace_id` pattern | `posthog:execute-sql` for distinct `$ai_trace_id` prefixes | | (Pattern B) `agent_mode` property is present on recent `$ai_generation` events | `posthog:execute-sql` group-by `properties.agent_mode` on recent `ai_product='posthog_ai'` events. Null bucket is normal (batch jobs + tool-internal calls) — you want non-null coverage across the modes you care about. | | `$session_id` is attached to the `$ai_generation` events (links trace to trigger session) | `posthog:execute-sql` for `countIf($session_id IS NOT NULL) / count()` | | `$session_id` is also attached to the `$ai_evaluation` events (lets the Slack alert link to the session) | Same query but on `$ai_evaluation` events after the eval has run once | | User has organisation-level AI data processing approval | Required for `llm_judge` evaluations and the eval summary tool |
If `$session_id` is missing on either event type, file a backend fix before continuing — there is no UI workaround. The session-summary feature has a worked example of the threading pattern in PR #54952. For Pattern B, the agent-mode threading pattern is in PR #55160.
Tools
| Tool
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Other skills on posthog.
- /analyzing-expensive-users
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user LLM cost, user-level cost drivers, or patterns behind high AI observability spend.
Open skill - /creating-online-evaluations
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants evaluations that automatically score new generations or whole traces going forward — "create an eval to catch X", "continuously
Open skill - /exploring-ai-failures
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand what's going wrong with an AI feature, find and categorize failure modes, triage errors, or investigate quality issues
Open skill - /exploring-llm-clusters
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.
Open skill - /exploring-llm-costs
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?",
Open skill - /exploring-llm-evaluations
Investigate AI observability evaluations — `hog` (deterministic code-based), `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based), and `sentiment` (user-message sentiment). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual results, and
Open skill

