Skip to content
Data
Skill

/exploring-mcp-tool-quality

Investigate the quality of PostHog MCP tool calls — error rates, latency, reach, and which tools are failing or slow. Use when the user asks "which MCP tool has the highest error rate?", "what's the slowest tool?", "which tools fail most often?", "how reliable is tool X?", wants

From plugin
posthog
38k156 skills11 agents1 command2 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill exploring-mcp-tool-quality --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/exploring-mcp-tool-quality

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Investigate the quality of PostHog MCP tool calls — error rates, latency, reach, and which tools are failing or slow. Use when the user asks "which MCP tool has the highest error rate?", "what's the slowest tool?", "which tools fail most often?", "how reliable is tool X?", wants

SKILL.md

exploring-mcp-tool-quality.SKILL.md
name: exploring-mcp-tool-quality
description: >
  Investigate the quality of PostHog MCP tool calls — error rates, latency,
  reach, and which tools are failing or slow. Use when the user asks "which
  MCP tool has the highest error rate?", "what's the slowest tool?", "which
  tools fail most often?", "how reliable is tool X?", wants a tool-quality
  matrix, or pastes an MCP analytics tool-quality / dashboard URL and asks
  what it shows.

Exploring MCP tool quality

Any MCP server instrumented with PostHog's MCP analytics SDK emits a `$mcp_tool_call` event on the shared `events` table every time an agent invokes a tool. There is **no dedicated ClickHouse table** — every field lives as a `$mcp_*` property on `events`, and every tool-quality metric (error rate, latency percentiles, reach) is an aggregation over this one event. This is the data behind the MCP analytics dashboard and tool-quality screens.

**For a single tool, prefer the typed tools** — `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` (calls, errors, p50/p95, users, sessions, intents), `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures` (top error messages by harness), and `posthog:query-mcp-tool-daily-stats` (day-by-day trend). Each takes a `toolName` + `dateRange`, runs the same query runner as the tool-detail UI, and is gated behind the `mcp-analytics` flag — no hand-written SQL needed.

**HogQL via `posthog:execute-sql` is the path for cross-tool questions** — the "which tool errors most" ranking below has no typed tool, so rank with SQL, then drill into the worst tool with `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` and `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures`. The full property schema and the canonical query recipes live in the shared MCP data reference: [`products/posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md`](../../../posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md). That reference is the single source of truth for the `$mcp_*` schema and the effective-tool-name idiom used below — this skill inlines only the headline "which tool errors most" query for convenience; pull the matrix, latency, and harness recipes from the reference rather than re-deriving them. Read it before writing queries.

The two rules that matter most

  • **Always use the effective tool name.** New-SDK events wrap the real tool in

a single-exec call, so grouping on raw `$mcp_tool_name` collapses everything under the wrapper. Use:

  coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name))
  • **Always read `$mcp_is_error` via `toBool(...)`** and cast

`$mcp_duration_ms` via `toFloat(...)`. The properties are strings.

Always set a time range — these queries scan `events` otherwise.

Workflow: which tool has the highest error rate

This is the canonical "which tool errors most" question. Rank tools by error rate, but guard against small-sample noise with a `HAVING` floor on call volume:

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) AS tool,
    count() AS total_calls,
    countIf(toBool(properties.$mcp_is_error)) AS errors,
    round(countIf(toBool(properties.$mcp_is_error)) * 100.0 / count(), 1) AS error_rate_pct
FROM events
WHERE event = '$mcp_tool_call'
    AND coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) != ''
    AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY tool
HAVING total_calls >= 20
ORDER BY error_rate_pct DESC, total_calls DESC
LIMIT 20

Report both **rate and volume** — a 100% error rate over 3 calls is rarely the real story; a 12% rate over 50,000 calls is. Offer to pull the top `$mcp_error_message` values for the worst tool (see below).

Workflow: tool-quality matrix

One row per tool with error rate, latency percentiles, and reach — mirrors the tool-quality screen. The ready-to-run query is in [models-mcp.md](../../../posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md) under "Tool-quality matrix".

Workflow: why is a tool failing

For one tool's top failure buckets (grouped by harness), call `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures` with the `toolName` — it's the typed equivalent of the query below. Failures come from the **same source as the error rate**: errored `$mcp_tool_call` events (`$mcp_is_error`), scoped by the effective tool name. Failures are grouped by `$mcp_error_type` (a semantic bucket: `internal`, `validation`, `api_4xx`, `api_5xx`, `permission`, `timeout`, `rate_limited`, `missing_context`) and the HTTP `$mcp_error_status` when present. To see individual errored calls inside a bucket — with the captured `$mcp_error_message`, session id, harness, and intent — pass the bucket's raw `error_type`/`error_status` to `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failure-occurrences` (`$mcp_error_message` is empty on events captured before message capture shipped):

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    concat(
        coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_error_type), ''), 'unknown'),
        if(empty(coalesce(toString(properties.$mcp_error_status), '')), '',
           concat(' (HTTP ', coalesce(toString(properties.$mcp_error_status), ''), ')'))
    ) AS failure,
    count() AS n
FROM events
WHERE event = '$mcp_tool_call'
    AND toBool(properties.$mcp_is_error)
    AND coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) = '<tool>'
    AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY failure ORDER BY n DESC LIMIT 10

`$mcp_error_type` is only populated on newer SDK/server paths — a chunk of errored calls carry neither type nor status and fall into the `unknown` bucket.

Workflow: slowest tools

Swap the aggregate for latency percentiles (`quantile(0.95)(toFloat(properties.$mcp_duration_ms))`) and order by `p95_ms`. The matrix query already returns `p50_ms` / `p95_ms`.

Constructing UI links

  • **Dashboard**: `https://app.posthog.com/project/<
Read more
Ships withposthog

:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on posthog.