/exploring-endpoint-execution-logs
Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says "my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill exploring-endpoint-execution-logs --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/exploring-endpoint-execution-logs
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says "my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y
SKILL.md
exploring-endpoint-execution-logs.SKILL.mdname: exploring-endpoint-execution-logs
description: >
Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache
misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says
"my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y produce",
"why did endpoint Z return no rows", "is this endpoint hitting cache", or "check the last N runs".
Focused on a single named endpoint's runtime log entries, not project-wide auditing or query
performance profiling.
Exploring endpoint execution logs
Every endpoint run emits one execution log entry to PostHog's `log_entries` store. This skill reads those entries for a specific endpoint to answer "what happened when it ran?". It is the log-level counterpart to `diagnosing-endpoint-performance` (which reasons about cache/materialisation strategy from config and `query_log`).
When to use this skill
- "Why is my endpoint failing / erroring?"
- "Show me the logs / recent runs for endpoint X"
- "Did the last run hit cache? How many rows did it return?"
- "What happened the last time endpoint Y ran?"
If the question is "this endpoint is slow, what should I change?", use `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`. If it's project-wide ("what can I clean up?"), use `auditing-endpoints`.
What an execution log entry looks like
Each run produces exactly one entry. The level is `INFO` on success and `ERROR` on failure, and the message carries the extra data as searchable `key=value` tokens:
Endpoint executed · path=materialized cache=hit duration_ms=142 rows=1024 version=3
Endpoint execution failed · path=inline error=ResolutionError version=3
Token meanings:
| Token | Values | Meaning | | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- | | `path` | `materialized` / `inline` / `ducklake` / `ducklake_fallback` | Which execution path ran | | `cache` | `hit` / `miss` | Whether the query result cache was used (omitted for ducklake) | | `duration_ms` | integer | Wall-clock execution time | | `rows` | integer | Number of result rows returned | | `version` | integer | Which endpoint version ran | | `error` | e.g. `ResolutionError`, `HogVMException` | Error class / HogQL code name (failures only) |
Each run gets a distinct `instance_id`, so logs group one-per-execution in the viewer.
Available tools
| Tool | Purpose | | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `endpoint-logs` | Primary. Execution log entries for one endpoint by name. Filter by level, search, time range, instance_id; `limit` up to 500. | | `endpoint-get` | Endpoint config for context (current version, materialisation, query kind) | | `execute-sql` | Fallback / aggregation directly against `log_entries` (`log_source='endpoints'`) |
Filtering
`endpoint-logs` exposes the standard log filters:
- **level** — comma-separated, e.g. `ERROR` to see only failed runs, or `INFO,ERROR` for all.
- **search** — case-insensitive substring over the message. Because the extra data is in
`key=value` tokens, you can search `cache=miss`, `path=inline`, `error=ResolutionError`, or a specific `version=3`.
- **after / before** — ISO timestamps to bound the time range.
- **instance_id** — pin a single execution.
- **limit** — 1–500 (default 50).
Workflow
1. Identify the endpoint by name. If given a URL, parse it from `/api/projects/{team_id}/endpoints/{name}/run`. 2. Start broad: `endpoint-logs` for the endpoint with a recent time range. Skim levels and tokens. 3. Narrow to the symptom:
- Failures → `level=ERROR`; read the `error=` token and `path=` to see where it broke.
- Cache concerns → `search=cache=miss` to see how often runs miss cache.
- Wrong results → compare `rows=` across runs, and `version=` to spot a regression after a
version bump. 4. For counts/trends across many runs (e.g. error rate over a week), drop to `execute-sql` against `log_entries`:
SELECT toDate(timestamp) AS day, upper(level) AS level, count() AS runs
FROM log_entries
WHERE log_source = 'endpoints' AND log_source_id = '<endpoint_uuid>'
GROUP BY day, level ORDER BY day DESC
Get the endpoint UUID from `endpoint-get` (the `log_source_id` is the endpoint id, not its name).
5. Summarize: what's failing, since when, on which version/path, and whether it's a config issue (hand off to `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`) or a query bug.
Example interaction
User: "weekly_signups started erroring this morning"
Agent steps:
- endpoint-logs weekly_signups, level=ERROR, after=<this morning>
→ several "Endpoint execution failed · path=inline error=ResolutionError version=5"
- endpoint-get weekly_signups → current version is v5 (bumped today)
- endpoint-logs weekly_signups, level=INFO, before=<this morning>
→ prior runs: "path=inline cache=hit ... version=4" succeeded
- "v5 (created this morning) is failing with a ResolutionError on the inline path — it can't
resolve a table or field refere
Read more
name: exploring-endpoint-execution-logs description: > Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says "my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y produce", "why did endpoint Z return no rows", "is this endpoint hitting cache", or "check the last N runs". Focused on a single named endpoint's runtime log entries, not project-wide auditing or query performance profiling.
Exploring endpoint execution logs
Every endpoint run emits one execution log entry to PostHog's `log_entries` store. This skill reads those entries for a specific endpoint to answer "what happened when it ran?". It is the log-level counterpart to `diagnosing-endpoint-performance` (which reasons about cache/materialisation strategy from config and `query_log`).
When to use this skill
- "Why is my endpoint failing / erroring?"
- "Show me the logs / recent runs for endpoint X"
- "Did the last run hit cache? How many rows did it return?"
- "What happened the last time endpoint Y ran?"
If the question is "this endpoint is slow, what should I change?", use `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`. If it's project-wide ("what can I clean up?"), use `auditing-endpoints`.
What an execution log entry looks like
Each run produces exactly one entry. The level is `INFO` on success and `ERROR` on failure, and the message carries the extra data as searchable `key=value` tokens:
Endpoint executed · path=materialized cache=hit duration_ms=142 rows=1024 version=3 Endpoint execution failed · path=inline error=ResolutionError version=3
Token meanings:
| Token | Values | Meaning | | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- | | `path` | `materialized` / `inline` / `ducklake` / `ducklake_fallback` | Which execution path ran | | `cache` | `hit` / `miss` | Whether the query result cache was used (omitted for ducklake) | | `duration_ms` | integer | Wall-clock execution time | | `rows` | integer | Number of result rows returned | | `version` | integer | Which endpoint version ran | | `error` | e.g. `ResolutionError`, `HogVMException` | Error class / HogQL code name (failures only) |
Each run gets a distinct `instance_id`, so logs group one-per-execution in the viewer.
Available tools
| Tool | Purpose | | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `endpoint-logs` | Primary. Execution log entries for one endpoint by name. Filter by level, search, time range, instance_id; `limit` up to 500. | | `endpoint-get` | Endpoint config for context (current version, materialisation, query kind) | | `execute-sql` | Fallback / aggregation directly against `log_entries` (`log_source='endpoints'`) |
Filtering
`endpoint-logs` exposes the standard log filters:
- **level** — comma-separated, e.g. `ERROR` to see only failed runs, or `INFO,ERROR` for all.
- **search** — case-insensitive substring over the message. Because the extra data is in
`key=value` tokens, you can search `cache=miss`, `path=inline`, `error=ResolutionError`, or a specific `version=3`.
- **after / before** — ISO timestamps to bound the time range.
- **instance_id** — pin a single execution.
- **limit** — 1–500 (default 50).
Workflow
1. Identify the endpoint by name. If given a URL, parse it from `/api/projects/{team_id}/endpoints/{name}/run`. 2. Start broad: `endpoint-logs` for the endpoint with a recent time range. Skim levels and tokens. 3. Narrow to the symptom:
- Failures → `level=ERROR`; read the `error=` token and `path=` to see where it broke.
- Cache concerns → `search=cache=miss` to see how often runs miss cache.
- Wrong results → compare `rows=` across runs, and `version=` to spot a regression after a
version bump. 4. For counts/trends across many runs (e.g. error rate over a week), drop to `execute-sql` against `log_entries`:
SELECT toDate(timestamp) AS day, upper(level) AS level, count() AS runs FROM log_entries WHERE log_source = 'endpoints' AND log_source_id = '<endpoint_uuid>' GROUP BY day, level ORDER BY day DESC
Get the endpoint UUID from `endpoint-get` (the `log_source_id` is the endpoint id, not its name).
5. Summarize: what's failing, since when, on which version/path, and whether it's a config issue (hand off to `diagnosing-endpoint-performance`) or a query bug.
Example interaction
User: "weekly_signups started erroring this morning" Agent steps: - endpoint-logs weekly_signups, level=ERROR, after=<this morning> → several "Endpoint execution failed · path=inline error=ResolutionError version=5" - endpoint-get weekly_signups → current version is v5 (bumped today) - endpoint-logs weekly_signups, level=INFO, before=<this morning> → prior runs: "path=inline cache=hit ... version=4" succeeded - "v5 (created this morning) is failing with a ResolutionError on the inline path — it can't resolve a table or field refere
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Other skills on posthog.
- /analyzing-expensive-users
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user LLM cost, user-level cost drivers, or patterns behind high AI observability spend.
Open skill - /creating-online-evaluations
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants evaluations that automatically score new generations or whole traces going forward — "create an eval to catch X", "continuously
Open skill - /exploring-ai-failures
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand what's going wrong with an AI feature, find and categorize failure modes, triage errors, or investigate quality issues
Open skill - /exploring-llm-clusters
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.
Open skill - /exploring-llm-costs
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?",
Open skill - /exploring-llm-evaluations
Investigate AI observability evaluations — `hog` (deterministic code-based), `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based), and `sentiment` (user-message sentiment). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual results, and
Open skill

