/exploring-apm-traces
Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP. Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, error-rate trends or spikes, latency distributions, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill exploring-apm-traces --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/exploring-apm-traces
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP. Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, error-rate trends or spikes, latency distributions, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI
SKILL.md
exploring-apm-traces.SKILL.mdname: exploring-apm-traces
description: >
Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP.
Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, error-rate trends or
spikes, latency distributions, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI observability traces or product logs.
Uses posthog:query-apm-spans, posthog:apm-trace-get, posthog:apm-spans-sparkline,
posthog:apm-services-list, posthog:apm-attributes-list, and posthog:apm-attribute-values-list.
Exploring APM traces (OpenTelemetry spans)
PostHog captures distributed traces from OpenTelemetry. Each trace is a tree of spans representing a request's path through services.
**Disambiguation:** This skill is for **APM / OpenTelemetry traces**. Do not confuse with **AI observability traces** (agent/model `$ai_*` events) or **logs** (`posthog:query-logs`, `posthog:logs-*`).
Available tools
| Tool | Purpose | | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | `posthog:query-apm-spans` | Search and filter spans (compact list view) | | `posthog:apm-trace-get` | Get the full span list for one hex `trace_id` | | `posthog:apm-spans-aggregate` | Per-operation aggregates (count, p50/p95, errors) | | `posthog:apm-spans-tree` | Call-tree aggregates per `(parent, child)` edge | | `posthog:apm-spans-count` | Scalar span count — cheap filter pre-flight | | `posthog:apm-spans-sparkline` | Span counts over time (zero-filled time series) | | `posthog:apm-spans-duration-histogram` | Trace counts per log-scale duration bucket | | `posthog:apm-attribute-breakdown` | Span counts grouped by one attribute's value | | `posthog:apm-services-list` | List distinct service names | | `posthog:apm-attributes-list` | List span or resource attribute keys | | `posthog:apm-attribute-values-list` | List values for a specific attribute key |
See [references/spans-and-fields.md](./references/spans-and-fields.md) for the response schema and the `kind`/`status_code` enums.
Workflow: debug a trace from a URL
Step 1 — Fetch the trace
posthog:apm-trace-get
{
"trace_id": "<hex_trace_id>"
}The response is `{ results: [span, span, …], _posthogUrl: "…" }` — a flat list of every span in the trace. The list can be very large for fan-out request flows; when it exceeds the inline limit, Claude Code auto-persists it to a file.
From the result you get:
- Every span with `name`, `service_name`, `kind`, `status_code`, `parent_span_id`, `duration_nano`, `is_root_span`
- The `_posthogUrl` — a deep link to this trace in the tracing UI; **always include this in your response** so the user can click through
Step 2 — Parse large results with scripts
When the result is persisted to a file (traces with hundreds of spans across services), use the [parsing scripts](./scripts/) to explore it.
**Start with the summary** to get the full picture, then drill into specifics:
# 1. Overview: services, span count, slowest spans, errors
python3 scripts/print_summary.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 2. Indented chronological tree (DFS by parent_span_id)
python3 scripts/print_timeline.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 3. Drill into a specific span by name
SPAN="HTTP GET /api/users" python3 scripts/extract_span.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 4. Search for a keyword across span names, services, IDs
SEARCH="keyword" python3 scripts/search_spans.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 5. When the JSON shape looks unfamiliar
python3 scripts/show_structure.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
All scripts support `MAX_LEN=N` env var to control truncation (`0` = unlimited).
Tree reconstruction (parent_span_id → span_id)
The flat span list is a tree. Each span carries:
- `trace_id` — same on every span in the trace
- `span_id` — this span's unique hex ID
- `parent_span_id` — points to the parent's `span_id` (zero-padded hex `000…000` for the root)
- `is_root_span` — convenience flag for the trace entry
To rebuild the tree:
1. Spans where `is_root_span` is true (or `parent_span_id == "00000000…"`) are **root spans**. 2. Every other span is a child of the span whose `span_id` matches its `parent_span_id`. 3. Group by `parent_span_id`, walk from each root downward.
`scripts/print_timeline.py` does this for you and prints a DFS-indented tree.
Investigation patterns
"Where is time going?"
1. Every span from `apm-trace-get` carries `self_time_nano` — duration not covered by children. Sort by it: the top span is where wall-clock actually went. A parent with large `self_time_nano` is an **uninstrumented gap** (the work happened inside it, not in any recorded child). 2. Run `print_summary.py` — it surfaces the top-5 slowest spans by `duration_nano`. 3. For a noisy trace, run `print_timeline.py` and scan the indented durations — you can see whether time is dominated by one child span or fan-out across many. 4. To dig into one slow span, `SPAN="<name>" python3 scripts/extract_span.py FILE`. 5. For aggregate "which child dominates" questions use `apm-spans-tree` and read `calls_per_parent_invocation` — it separates a child that's slow per call from one that merely runs 20× per parent.
"Where did the error happen?"
1. `print_summary.py` lists every span with `status_code == 2` (Error). Each entry shows service, span name, and parent context. 2. Walk up the tree from an error span via `parent_span_id` to see what request path led there. 3. Error detail lives in each span's `attributes` map (e.g. `exception.message`, `exception.type`), which **is** returned in the trace payload — read it directly off the error span. `apm-attribute-values-list` is for discovering values
Read more
name: exploring-apm-traces description: > Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP. Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, error-rate trends or spikes, latency distributions, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI observability traces or product logs. Uses posthog:query-apm-spans, posthog:apm-trace-get, posthog:apm-spans-sparkline, posthog:apm-services-list, posthog:apm-attributes-list, and posthog:apm-attribute-values-list.
Exploring APM traces (OpenTelemetry spans)
PostHog captures distributed traces from OpenTelemetry. Each trace is a tree of spans representing a request's path through services.
**Disambiguation:** This skill is for **APM / OpenTelemetry traces**. Do not confuse with **AI observability traces** (agent/model `$ai_*` events) or **logs** (`posthog:query-logs`, `posthog:logs-*`).
Available tools
| Tool | Purpose | | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | `posthog:query-apm-spans` | Search and filter spans (compact list view) | | `posthog:apm-trace-get` | Get the full span list for one hex `trace_id` | | `posthog:apm-spans-aggregate` | Per-operation aggregates (count, p50/p95, errors) | | `posthog:apm-spans-tree` | Call-tree aggregates per `(parent, child)` edge | | `posthog:apm-spans-count` | Scalar span count — cheap filter pre-flight | | `posthog:apm-spans-sparkline` | Span counts over time (zero-filled time series) | | `posthog:apm-spans-duration-histogram` | Trace counts per log-scale duration bucket | | `posthog:apm-attribute-breakdown` | Span counts grouped by one attribute's value | | `posthog:apm-services-list` | List distinct service names | | `posthog:apm-attributes-list` | List span or resource attribute keys | | `posthog:apm-attribute-values-list` | List values for a specific attribute key |
See [references/spans-and-fields.md](./references/spans-and-fields.md) for the response schema and the `kind`/`status_code` enums.
Workflow: debug a trace from a URL
Step 1 — Fetch the trace
posthog:apm-trace-get
{
"trace_id": "<hex_trace_id>"
}The response is `{ results: [span, span, …], _posthogUrl: "…" }` — a flat list of every span in the trace. The list can be very large for fan-out request flows; when it exceeds the inline limit, Claude Code auto-persists it to a file.
From the result you get:
- Every span with `name`, `service_name`, `kind`, `status_code`, `parent_span_id`, `duration_nano`, `is_root_span`
- The `_posthogUrl` — a deep link to this trace in the tracing UI; **always include this in your response** so the user can click through
Step 2 — Parse large results with scripts
When the result is persisted to a file (traces with hundreds of spans across services), use the [parsing scripts](./scripts/) to explore it.
**Start with the summary** to get the full picture, then drill into specifics:
# 1. Overview: services, span count, slowest spans, errors python3 scripts/print_summary.py /path/to/persisted-file.json # 2. Indented chronological tree (DFS by parent_span_id) python3 scripts/print_timeline.py /path/to/persisted-file.json # 3. Drill into a specific span by name SPAN="HTTP GET /api/users" python3 scripts/extract_span.py /path/to/persisted-file.json # 4. Search for a keyword across span names, services, IDs SEARCH="keyword" python3 scripts/search_spans.py /path/to/persisted-file.json # 5. When the JSON shape looks unfamiliar python3 scripts/show_structure.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
All scripts support `MAX_LEN=N` env var to control truncation (`0` = unlimited).
Tree reconstruction (parent_span_id → span_id)
The flat span list is a tree. Each span carries:
- `trace_id` — same on every span in the trace
- `span_id` — this span's unique hex ID
- `parent_span_id` — points to the parent's `span_id` (zero-padded hex `000…000` for the root)
- `is_root_span` — convenience flag for the trace entry
To rebuild the tree:
1. Spans where `is_root_span` is true (or `parent_span_id == "00000000…"`) are **root spans**. 2. Every other span is a child of the span whose `span_id` matches its `parent_span_id`. 3. Group by `parent_span_id`, walk from each root downward.
`scripts/print_timeline.py` does this for you and prints a DFS-indented tree.
Investigation patterns
"Where is time going?"
1. Every span from `apm-trace-get` carries `self_time_nano` — duration not covered by children. Sort by it: the top span is where wall-clock actually went. A parent with large `self_time_nano` is an **uninstrumented gap** (the work happened inside it, not in any recorded child). 2. Run `print_summary.py` — it surfaces the top-5 slowest spans by `duration_nano`. 3. For a noisy trace, run `print_timeline.py` and scan the indented durations — you can see whether time is dominated by one child span or fan-out across many. 4. To dig into one slow span, `SPAN="<name>" python3 scripts/extract_span.py FILE`. 5. For aggregate "which child dominates" questions use `apm-spans-tree` and read `calls_per_parent_invocation` — it separates a child that's slow per call from one that merely runs 20× per parent.
"Where did the error happen?"
1. `print_summary.py` lists every span with `status_code == 2` (Error). Each entry shows service, span name, and parent context. 2. Walk up the tree from an error span via `parent_span_id` to see what request path led there. 3. Error detail lives in each span's `attributes` map (e.g. `exception.message`, `exception.type`), which **is** returned in the trace payload — read it directly off the error span. `apm-attribute-values-list` is for discovering values
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Other skills on posthog.
- /analyzing-expensive-users
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user LLM cost, user-level cost drivers, or patterns behind high AI observability spend.
Open skill - /creating-online-evaluations
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants evaluations that automatically score new generations or whole traces going forward — "create an eval to catch X", "continuously
Open skill - /exploring-ai-failures
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand what's going wrong with an AI feature, find and categorize failure modes, triage errors, or investigate quality issues
Open skill - /exploring-llm-clusters
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.
Open skill - /exploring-llm-costs
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?",
Open skill - /exploring-llm-evaluations
Investigate AI observability evaluations — `hog` (deterministic code-based), `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based), and `sentiment` (user-message sentiment). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual results, and
Open skill

