/creating-experiments
Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill creating-experiments --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/creating-experiments
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to
SKILL.md
creating-experiments.SKILL.mdname: creating-experiments
description: "Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments."
Creating experiments
This skill walks through the 3-step flow for creating a new A/B test experiment.
Core principle: draft first, iterate on details
Create the experiment as a draft quickly, then iterate on metrics and configuration. The user gets a tangible draft immediately and can refine it.
The 3-step creation flow
Step 1: What are we testing?
Gather these before calling `experiment-create`:
- **Experiment name** — descriptive, inferred from context when possible
- **Hypothesis** — what you expect to happen (goes in `description`)
- **Feature flag key** — kebab-case. Ask if they want a new flag or to reuse an existing one.
The flag is auto-created — do NOT create one separately.
- **Type** — leave empty (will internally default to `"product"`. The `"web"` value is reserved for no-code experiments configured visually with the PostHog
toolbar in a browser; it cannot be meaningfully driven via MCP. If a user asks for a no-code/toolbar experiment, point them to the PostHog UI instead of creating one here.)
If the user gives enough context to infer these, don't ask — just proceed.
Step 2: Who sees what variant?
This is about rollout configuration.
**Before asking any rollout question, load `configuring-experiment-rollout`.** The disambiguation wording, recommendations, and post-answer branches live there — do not formulate rollout questions yourself, and do not assume an example you remember covers the user's path.
Key decision points (covered in detail by `configuring-experiment-rollout`):
- Variant split (how many variants, what percentage each)
- Overall rollout percentage (what % of all users enter the experiment)
- Whether to persist the flag across authentication steps
If the user doesn't mention rollout specifics, use defaults: 50/50 control/test, 100% rollout.
Step 3: How to measure impact?
This is about analytics and metrics. **Load the `configuring-experiment-analytics` skill** for guidance. That skill's first step checks for an existing **shared metric** to reuse before building a new one — don't duplicate a metric the project already has set up.
**Do NOT configure metrics on creation.** Metrics are not passed to `experiment-create` — they are added afterwards via `experiment-update`. This keeps the creation call lightweight.
When the user specifies metrics upfront, acknowledge them and add them immediately after creation. When they don't, create the draft and then guide them through metric setup as a follow-up.
How to create
Call `experiment-create` with:
{
"name": "Descriptive experiment name",
"feature_flag_key": "kebab-case-key",
"description": "Hypothesis: [what you expect to happen]",
"feature_flag": {
"filters": {
"multivariate": {
"variants": [
{ "key": "control", "name": "Control", "rollout_percentage": 50 },
{ "key": "test", "name": "Test", "rollout_percentage": 50 }
]
},
"groups": [{ "properties": [], "rollout_percentage": 100 }]
},
"ensure_experience_continuity": false
}
}Flag config goes in the `feature_flag` object, in the flag's own filters shape (not the deprecated `parameters` keys). Two different percentages live in there, do NOT mix them up:
- `filters.multivariate.variants[].rollout_percentage` is how users **inside** the experiment are split across variants (must sum to 100, recommended to have an even split).
- `filters.groups[0].rollout_percentage` is the overall gate: what fraction of **all** users enter the experiment at all (0-100, defaults to 100).
Key details:
- Minimum 2, maximum 20 variants. No specific variant key is required — the analysis baseline defaults to the variant keyed `"control"` when present, else the first variant (override with `stats_config.baseline_variant_key`). Convention: key the baseline `"control"` unless the user asks for specific keys.
- `filters.groups[0].rollout_percentage` defaults to 100 if omitted.
- `ensure_experience_continuity` persists a user's variant across authentication steps; leave it `false` unless the flag is shown to both logged-out and logged-in users (see `configuring-experiment-rollout`).
- Stats default to Bayesian. Only set `stats_config` if the user requests Frequentist.
After creation
1. **Always show the experiment URL.** The `experiment-create` response includes `_posthogUrl` — always display this link so the user can view and configure the experiment in the UI.
2. **Remind the user to implement the feature flag in code.** Link to the experiment page and say "implement the flag as shown here" — the experiment detail page shows implementation snippets for the user's SDK.
3. **Guide through metrics** if not yet configured — load the `configuring-experiment-analytics` skill.
4. **Launch** when ready — use the `experiment-launch` tool.
Read more
name: creating-experiments description: "Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments."
Creating experiments
This skill walks through the 3-step flow for creating a new A/B test experiment.
Core principle: draft first, iterate on details
Create the experiment as a draft quickly, then iterate on metrics and configuration. The user gets a tangible draft immediately and can refine it.
The 3-step creation flow
Step 1: What are we testing?
Gather these before calling `experiment-create`:
- **Experiment name** — descriptive, inferred from context when possible
- **Hypothesis** — what you expect to happen (goes in `description`)
- **Feature flag key** — kebab-case. Ask if they want a new flag or to reuse an existing one.
The flag is auto-created — do NOT create one separately.
- **Type** — leave empty (will internally default to `"product"`. The `"web"` value is reserved for no-code experiments configured visually with the PostHog
toolbar in a browser; it cannot be meaningfully driven via MCP. If a user asks for a no-code/toolbar experiment, point them to the PostHog UI instead of creating one here.)
If the user gives enough context to infer these, don't ask — just proceed.
Step 2: Who sees what variant?
This is about rollout configuration.
**Before asking any rollout question, load `configuring-experiment-rollout`.** The disambiguation wording, recommendations, and post-answer branches live there — do not formulate rollout questions yourself, and do not assume an example you remember covers the user's path.
Key decision points (covered in detail by `configuring-experiment-rollout`):
- Variant split (how many variants, what percentage each)
- Overall rollout percentage (what % of all users enter the experiment)
- Whether to persist the flag across authentication steps
If the user doesn't mention rollout specifics, use defaults: 50/50 control/test, 100% rollout.
Step 3: How to measure impact?
This is about analytics and metrics. **Load the `configuring-experiment-analytics` skill** for guidance. That skill's first step checks for an existing **shared metric** to reuse before building a new one — don't duplicate a metric the project already has set up.
**Do NOT configure metrics on creation.** Metrics are not passed to `experiment-create` — they are added afterwards via `experiment-update`. This keeps the creation call lightweight.
When the user specifies metrics upfront, acknowledge them and add them immediately after creation. When they don't, create the draft and then guide them through metric setup as a follow-up.
How to create
Call `experiment-create` with:
{
"name": "Descriptive experiment name",
"feature_flag_key": "kebab-case-key",
"description": "Hypothesis: [what you expect to happen]",
"feature_flag": {
"filters": {
"multivariate": {
"variants": [
{ "key": "control", "name": "Control", "rollout_percentage": 50 },
{ "key": "test", "name": "Test", "rollout_percentage": 50 }
]
},
"groups": [{ "properties": [], "rollout_percentage": 100 }]
},
"ensure_experience_continuity": false
}
}Flag config goes in the `feature_flag` object, in the flag's own filters shape (not the deprecated `parameters` keys). Two different percentages live in there, do NOT mix them up:
- `filters.multivariate.variants[].rollout_percentage` is how users **inside** the experiment are split across variants (must sum to 100, recommended to have an even split).
- `filters.groups[0].rollout_percentage` is the overall gate: what fraction of **all** users enter the experiment at all (0-100, defaults to 100).
Key details:
- Minimum 2, maximum 20 variants. No specific variant key is required — the analysis baseline defaults to the variant keyed `"control"` when present, else the first variant (override with `stats_config.baseline_variant_key`). Convention: key the baseline `"control"` unless the user asks for specific keys.
- `filters.groups[0].rollout_percentage` defaults to 100 if omitted.
- `ensure_experience_continuity` persists a user's variant across authentication steps; leave it `false` unless the flag is shown to both logged-out and logged-in users (see `configuring-experiment-rollout`).
- Stats default to Bayesian. Only set `stats_config` if the user requests Frequentist.
After creation
1. **Always show the experiment URL.** The `experiment-create` response includes `_posthogUrl` — always display this link so the user can view and configure the experiment in the UI.
2. **Remind the user to implement the feature flag in code.** Link to the experiment page and say "implement the flag as shown here" — the experiment detail page shows implementation snippets for the user's SDK.
3. **Guide through metrics** if not yet configured — load the `configuring-experiment-analytics` skill.
4. **Launch** when ready — use the `experiment-launch` tool.
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Other skills on posthog.
- /analyzing-expensive-users
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user LLM cost, user-level cost drivers, or patterns behind high AI observability spend.
Open skill - /creating-online-evaluations
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants evaluations that automatically score new generations or whole traces going forward — "create an eval to catch X", "continuously
Open skill - /exploring-ai-failures
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand what's going wrong with an AI feature, find and categorize failure modes, triage errors, or investigate quality issues
Open skill - /exploring-llm-clusters
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.
Open skill - /exploring-llm-costs
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?",
Open skill - /exploring-llm-evaluations
Investigate AI observability evaluations — `hog` (deterministic code-based), `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based), and `sentiment` (user-message sentiment). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual results, and
Open skill

