checking-member-access
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what someone can see or edit, who can…
Copy a PostHog endpoint (a saved HogQL/insight query exposed as an API route) to another project in the same organization, or duplicate it under a new name in the same project. Use when the user wants to duplicate an endpoint, promote an endpoint from staging to production,
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill copying-endpoints-across-projects --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/copying-endpoints-across-projectsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Copy a PostHog endpoint (a saved HogQL/insight query exposed as an API route) to another project in the same organization, or duplicate it under a new name in the same project. Use when the user wants to duplicate an endpoint, promote an endpoint from staging to production,
name: copying-endpoints-across-projects description: > Copy a PostHog endpoint (a saved HogQL/insight query exposed as an API route) to another project in the same organization, or duplicate it under a new name in the same project. Use when the user wants to duplicate an endpoint, promote an endpoint from staging to production, replicate an endpoint's query/variables/freshness config in another workspace, or clone an endpoint to iterate on it. Unlike feature flags and experiments, endpoints have NO native cross-project copy tool — this skill covers the read-then-recreate flow (endpoint-get then endpoint-create), the active-project switching it requires, name-collision checks, and the safe defaults (land unmaterialised in the target, verify with endpoint-run). Does not cover editing endpoint versions (see managing-endpoint-versions) or authoring a brand-new endpoint from scratch (see creating-an-endpoint).
This skill duplicates a PostHog **endpoint** — a saved HogQL or insight query exposed as a callable API route — either into another project in the same organization, or under a new name in the same project.
There is **no server-side endpoint copy operation**. Feature flags have `feature-flags-copy-flags-create` and experiments have `experiment-copy-to-project`; endpoints have **neither**. Copying an endpoint means:
1. Read the full source config with `endpoint-get`. 2. Recreate it with `endpoint-create` (in the target project, or under a new name in the same project).
Both `endpoint-get` and `endpoint-create` operate **only on the active MCP project** — neither takes a project id. So a cross-project copy requires the active project to be **switched** between the read (source) and the write (target). Read the source first, capture the config, then switch to the target and create. If you cannot switch projects in this session, tell the user rather than creating the copy in the wrong project.
You need the endpoint's **name** and the **source project**.
Call `endpoint-get` with the source name. Capture everything you'll need to recreate it:
Present a short summary to the user before copying: what the query returns, its variables, its freshness setting, and whether the source is materialised.
**Cross-project:** confirm the target project belongs to the same org and the user has editor access there. The copy will be created in whatever project is active at `endpoint-create` time, so plan to switch the active project to the target between step 2 and step 6.
**Same-project duplicate:** the new endpoint needs a **different name** — names are unique within a project and the URL path (`/api/projects/{team_id}/endpoints/{name}/run`) depends on it. Agree a new name with the user.
Either way, run `endpoints-get-all` in the target project and check whether the intended name already exists. If it does, stop and ask: creating over an existing name is not a safe silent action. Get the name right up front — it's baked into the caller URL and not trivially renameable later.
**Default to `is_materialized: false` on the copy, even when the source is materialised.** Rationale mirrors the safe default in `copying-flags-across-projects` (land disabled): materialisation costs recompute/storage on a cadence, and a freshly-copied endpoint has no proven traffic in the target yet. Ship it unmaterialised, confirm it's actually called, then enable materialisation later once usage justifies the cost.
Override to `is_materialized: true` only if the user explicitly wants the copy materialised from day one (e.g. a like-for-like production promotion of a high-traffic endpoint). Note the caveats from `creating-an-endpoint`: queries with coh
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what someone can see or edit, who can…
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user…
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants…
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand…
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into…
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost…