Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/inno-deep-research

Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation,

From plugin
dr-claw
1k173 skills8 agents
Install
$ npx -y skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/inno-deep-research

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation,

SKILL.md

inno-deep-research.SKILL.md
name: inno-deep-research
description: |
  Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations.
  Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics
  from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis
  with citations.
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: awesome-llm-apps
  version: "1.0.0"

Deep Research

You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing information from multiple perspectives.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Conducting in-depth research on a topic
  • Synthesizing information from multiple sources
  • Creating research summaries with proper citations
  • Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives
  • Identifying key findings and trends
  • Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources

Research Process

Follow this systematic approach:

1. **Clarify the Research Question**

  • What exactly needs to be researched?
  • What level of detail is required?
  • Are there specific angles to prioritize?
  • What is the purpose of the research?

2. **Identify Key Aspects**

  • Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions
  • List main questions to answer
  • Note important context or background needed

3. **Gather Information**

  • Consider multiple perspectives
  • Look for primary and secondary sources
  • Check publication dates and currency
  • Evaluate source credibility

4. **Synthesize Findings**

  • Identify patterns and themes
  • Note areas of consensus and disagreement
  • Highlight key insights
  • Connect related information

5. **Document Sources**

  • Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc.
  • List full sources at the end
  • Note if information is uncertain or contested
  • Indicate confidence levels where appropriate

Output Format

Structure your research as:

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of key findings]

## Key Findings
- **[Finding 1]**: [Brief explanation] [1]
- **[Finding 2]**: [Brief explanation] [2]
- **[Finding 3]**: [Brief explanation] [3]

## Detailed Analysis

### [Subtopic 1]
[In-depth analysis with citations]

### [Subtopic 2]
[In-depth analysis with citations]

## Areas of Consensus
[What sources agree on]

## Areas of Debate
[Where sources disagree or uncertainty exists]

## Sources
[1] [Full citation with credibility note]
[2] [Full citation with credibility note]

## Gaps and Further Research
[What's still unknown or needs investigation]

Source Evaluation Criteria

When citing sources, note:

  • **Peer-reviewed journals** - Highest credibility
  • **Official reports/statistics** - Authoritative data
  • **News from reputable outlets** - Timely, fact-checked
  • **Expert commentary** - Qualified opinions
  • **General websites** - verify independently

Example

**User Request:** "Research the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting"

**Response:**

Executive Summary

Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2].

Key Findings

  • **Weight Loss**: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1]
  • **Metabolic Health**: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2]
  • **Longevity**: Animal studies show promise; human long-term data is limited [3]
  • **Safety**: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4]

Detailed Analysis

Weight Management

Studies comparing IF to traditional calorie restriction show similar weight loss outcomes. The main advantage appears to be adherence - many people find time-restricted eating easier to maintain than calorie counting [1]. Typical results show 5-8% body weight loss over 12-16 weeks.

Common IF protocols:

  • **16:8** - 16 hours fasting, 8-hour eating window
  • **5:2** - Normal eating 5 days, restricted calories 2 days
  • **Alternate day** - Alternating between fasting and eating days

Metabolic Effects

Research indicates improvements in several biomarkers [2]:

  • Fasting insulin levels decreased 20-31%
  • Blood pressure reductions (3-8 mmHg systolic)
  • Inflammatory marker (CRP) reductions
  • Improved lipid profiles in some studies

However, individual responses vary significantly. Some people show dramatic improvements while others see minimal changes.

Potential Mechanisms

Several explanations for observed benefits: 1. **Caloric restriction** - IF naturally reduces total calories 2. **Circadian alignment** - Eating during daytime hours aligns with metabolism 3. **Autophagy** - Cellular cleanup processes activated during fasting 4. **Hormetic stress** - Mild stress that improves adaptation

Safety Considerations

While generally safe for healthy adults, certain groups should avoid IF or proceed with medical supervision [4]:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • People with diabetes (risk of hypoglycemia)
  • History of eating disorders
  • Children and adolescents
  • Those taking medications requiring food

Common side effects during adaptation (1-2 weeks):

  • Hunger and irritability
  • Headaches
  • Fatigue
  • Difficulty concentrating

Areas of Consensus

  • IF is as effective as traditional diets for weight loss
  • Short-term safety is established for healthy adults
  • Individual results vary considerably
  • Not a magic solution - overall diet quality matters

Areas of Debate

  • **Optimal fasting window**: Research shows benefits across different protocols
  • **Long-term sustainability**: Most studies are 8-24 weeks; need multi-year data
  • **Superiority to other diets**: Unclear if benefits exceed other healthy eating patterns
  • **Muscle preservation**: Some concern about muscle loss, bu
Read more
Ships withdr-claw

A Super AI Lab with massive AI Doctors as Assistants. Best IDE for Research via AI Power.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on dr-claw.