Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/inno-deep-research

Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation,

From plugin
dr-claw
1.1k174 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/inno-deep-research

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation,

SKILL.md

inno-deep-research.SKILL.md
name: inno-deep-research
description: |
  Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations.
  Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics
  from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis
  with citations.
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: awesome-llm-apps
  version: "1.0.0"

Deep Research

You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing information from multiple perspectives.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Conducting in-depth research on a topic
  • Synthesizing information from multiple sources
  • Creating research summaries with proper citations
  • Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives
  • Identifying key findings and trends
  • Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources

Research Process

Follow this systematic approach:

1. **Clarify the Research Question**

  • What exactly needs to be researched?
  • What level of detail is required?
  • Are there specific angles to prioritize?
  • What is the purpose of the research?

2. **Identify Key Aspects**

  • Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions
  • List main questions to answer
  • Note important context or background needed

3. **Gather Information**

  • Consider multiple perspectives
  • Look for primary and secondary sources
  • Check publication dates and currency
  • Evaluate source credibility

4. **Synthesize Findings**

  • Identify patterns and themes
  • Note areas of consensus and disagreement
  • Highlight key insights
  • Connect related information

5. **Document Sources**

  • Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc.
  • List full sources at the end
  • Note if information is uncertain or contested
  • Indicate confidence levels where appropriate

Output Format

Structure your research as:

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of key findings]

## Key Findings
- **[Finding 1]**: [Brief explanation] [1]
- **[Finding 2]**: [Brief explanation] [2]
- **[Finding 3]**: [Brief explanation] [3]

## Detailed Analysis

### [Subtopic 1]
[In-depth analysis with citations]

### [Subtopic 2]
[In-depth analysis with citations]

## Areas of Consensus
[What sources agree on]

## Areas of Debate
[Where sources disagree or uncertainty exists]

## Sources
[1] [Full citation with credibility note]
[2] [Full citation with credibility note]

## Gaps and Further Research
[What's still unknown or needs investigation]

Source Evaluation Criteria

When citing sources, note:

  • **Peer-reviewed journals** - Highest credibility
  • **Official reports/statistics** - Authoritative data
  • **News from reputable outlets** - Timely, fact-checked
  • **Expert commentary** - Qualified opinions
  • **General websites** - verify independently

Example

**User Request:** "Research the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting"

**Response:**

Executive Summary

Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2].

Key Findings

  • **Weight Loss**: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1]
  • **Metabolic Health**: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2]
  • **Longevity**: Animal studies show promise; human long-term data is limited [3]
  • **Safety**: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4]

Detailed Analysis

Weight Management

Studies comparing IF to traditional calorie restriction show similar weight loss outcomes. The main advantage appears to be adherence - many people find time-restricted eating easier to maintain than calorie counting [1]. Typical results show 5-8% body weight loss over 12-16 weeks.

Common IF protocols:

  • **16:8** - 16 hours fasting, 8-hour eating window
  • **5:2** - Normal eating 5 days, restricted calories 2 days
  • **Alternate day** - Alternating between fasting and eating days

Metabolic Effects

Research indicates improvements in several biomarkers [2]:

  • Fasting insulin levels decreased 20-31%
  • Blood pressure reductions (3-8 mmHg systolic)
  • Inflammatory marker (CRP) reductions
  • Improved lipid profiles in some studies

However, individual responses vary significantly. Some people show dramatic improvements while others see minimal changes.

Potential Mechanisms

Several explanations for observed benefits: 1. **Caloric restriction** - IF naturally reduces total calories 2. **Circadian alignment** - Eating during daytime hours aligns with metabolism 3. **Autophagy** - Cellular cleanup processes activated during fasting 4. **Hormetic stress** - Mild stress that improves adaptation

Safety Considerations

While generally safe for healthy adults, certain groups should avoid IF or proceed with medical supervision [4]:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • People with diabetes (risk of hypoglycemia)
  • History of eating disorders
  • Children and adolescents
  • Those taking medications requiring food

Common side effects during adaptation (1-2 weeks):

  • Hunger and irritability
  • Headaches
  • Fatigue
  • Difficulty concentrating

Areas of Consensus

  • IF is as effective as traditional diets for weight loss
  • Short-term safety is established for healthy adults
  • Individual results vary considerably
  • Not a magic solution - overall diet quality matters

Areas of Debate

  • **Optimal fasting window**: Research shows benefits across different protocols
  • **Long-term sustainability**: Most studies are 8-24 weeks; need multi-year data
  • **Superiority to other diets**: Unclear if benefits exceed other healthy eating patterns
  • **Muscle preservation**: Some concern about muscle loss, bu
Read more
Ships withdr-claw

A Super AI Lab with massive AI Doctors as Assistants. Best IDE for Research via AI Power.

Get the whole plugin
Stats
1,091
Stars
119
Forks
Active
Maintenance
JavaScript
Language
6d ago
Last commit
6mo ago
Created

Repo: OpenLAIR/dr-claw

Other skills on dr-claw.