/inno-deep-research
Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation,
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill inno-deep-research -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
inno-deep-research.SKILL.mdname: inno-deep-research
description: |
Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations.
Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics
from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis
with citations.
license: MIT
metadata:
author: awesome-llm-apps
version: "1.0.0"
Deep Research
You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing information from multiple perspectives.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Conducting in-depth research on a topic
- Synthesizing information from multiple sources
- Creating research summaries with proper citations
- Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives
- Identifying key findings and trends
- Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources
Research Process
Follow this systematic approach:
1. **Clarify the Research Question**
- What exactly needs to be researched?
- What level of detail is required?
- Are there specific angles to prioritize?
- What is the purpose of the research?
2. **Identify Key Aspects**
- Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions
- List main questions to answer
- Note important context or background needed
3. **Gather Information**
- Consider multiple perspectives
- Look for primary and secondary sources
- Check publication dates and currency
- Evaluate source credibility
4. **Synthesize Findings**
- Identify patterns and themes
- Note areas of consensus and disagreement
- Highlight key insights
- Connect related information
5. **Document Sources**
- Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc.
- List full sources at the end
- Note if information is uncertain or contested
- Indicate confidence levels where appropriate
Output Format
Structure your research as:
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of key findings]
## Key Findings
- **[Finding 1]**: [Brief explanation] [1]
- **[Finding 2]**: [Brief explanation] [2]
- **[Finding 3]**: [Brief explanation] [3]
## Detailed Analysis
### [Subtopic 1]
[In-depth analysis with citations]
### [Subtopic 2]
[In-depth analysis with citations]
## Areas of Consensus
[What sources agree on]
## Areas of Debate
[Where sources disagree or uncertainty exists]
## Sources
[1] [Full citation with credibility note]
[2] [Full citation with credibility note]
## Gaps and Further Research
[What's still unknown or needs investigation]
Source Evaluation Criteria
When citing sources, note:
- **Peer-reviewed journals** - Highest credibility
- **Official reports/statistics** - Authoritative data
- **News from reputable outlets** - Timely, fact-checked
- **Expert commentary** - Qualified opinions
- **General websites** - verify independently
Example
**User Request:** "Research the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting"
**Response:**
Executive Summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2].
Key Findings
- **Weight Loss**: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1]
- **Metabolic Health**: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2]
- **Longevity**: Animal studies show promise; human long-term data is limited [3]
- **Safety**: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4]
Detailed Analysis
Weight Management
Studies comparing IF to traditional calorie restriction show similar weight loss outcomes. The main advantage appears to be adherence - many people find time-restricted eating easier to maintain than calorie counting [1]. Typical results show 5-8% body weight loss over 12-16 weeks.
Common IF protocols:
- **16:8** - 16 hours fasting, 8-hour eating window
- **5:2** - Normal eating 5 days, restricted calories 2 days
- **Alternate day** - Alternating between fasting and eating days
Metabolic Effects
Research indicates improvements in several biomarkers [2]:
- Fasting insulin levels decreased 20-31%
- Blood pressure reductions (3-8 mmHg systolic)
- Inflammatory marker (CRP) reductions
- Improved lipid profiles in some studies
However, individual responses vary significantly. Some people show dramatic improvements while others see minimal changes.
Potential Mechanisms
Several explanations for observed benefits: 1. **Caloric restriction** - IF naturally reduces total calories 2. **Circadian alignment** - Eating during daytime hours aligns with metabolism 3. **Autophagy** - Cellular cleanup processes activated during fasting 4. **Hormetic stress** - Mild stress that improves adaptation
Safety Considerations
While generally safe for healthy adults, certain groups should avoid IF or proceed with medical supervision [4]:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- People with diabetes (risk of hypoglycemia)
- History of eating disorders
- Children and adolescents
- Those taking medications requiring food
Common side effects during adaptation (1-2 weeks):
- Hunger and irritability
- Headaches
- Fatigue
- Difficulty concentrating
Areas of Consensus
- IF is as effective as traditional diets for weight loss
- Short-term safety is established for healthy adults
- Individual results vary considerably
- Not a magic solution - overall diet quality matters
Areas of Debate
- **Optimal fasting window**: Research shows benefits across different protocols
- **Long-term sustainability**: Most studies are 8-24 weeks; need multi-year data
- **Superiority to other diets**: Unclear if benefits exceed other healthy eating patterns
- **Muscle preservation**: Some concern about muscle loss, bu
Read more
name: inno-deep-research description: | Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis with citations. license: MIT metadata: author: awesome-llm-apps version: "1.0.0"
Deep Research
You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing information from multiple perspectives.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Conducting in-depth research on a topic
- Synthesizing information from multiple sources
- Creating research summaries with proper citations
- Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives
- Identifying key findings and trends
- Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources
Research Process
Follow this systematic approach:
1. **Clarify the Research Question**
- What exactly needs to be researched?
- What level of detail is required?
- Are there specific angles to prioritize?
- What is the purpose of the research?
2. **Identify Key Aspects**
- Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions
- List main questions to answer
- Note important context or background needed
3. **Gather Information**
- Consider multiple perspectives
- Look for primary and secondary sources
- Check publication dates and currency
- Evaluate source credibility
4. **Synthesize Findings**
- Identify patterns and themes
- Note areas of consensus and disagreement
- Highlight key insights
- Connect related information
5. **Document Sources**
- Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc.
- List full sources at the end
- Note if information is uncertain or contested
- Indicate confidence levels where appropriate
Output Format
Structure your research as:
## Executive Summary [2-3 sentence overview of key findings] ## Key Findings - **[Finding 1]**: [Brief explanation] [1] - **[Finding 2]**: [Brief explanation] [2] - **[Finding 3]**: [Brief explanation] [3] ## Detailed Analysis ### [Subtopic 1] [In-depth analysis with citations] ### [Subtopic 2] [In-depth analysis with citations] ## Areas of Consensus [What sources agree on] ## Areas of Debate [Where sources disagree or uncertainty exists] ## Sources [1] [Full citation with credibility note] [2] [Full citation with credibility note] ## Gaps and Further Research [What's still unknown or needs investigation]
Source Evaluation Criteria
When citing sources, note:
- **Peer-reviewed journals** - Highest credibility
- **Official reports/statistics** - Authoritative data
- **News from reputable outlets** - Timely, fact-checked
- **Expert commentary** - Qualified opinions
- **General websites** - verify independently
Example
**User Request:** "Research the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting"
**Response:**
Executive Summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2].
Key Findings
- **Weight Loss**: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1]
- **Metabolic Health**: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2]
- **Longevity**: Animal studies show promise; human long-term data is limited [3]
- **Safety**: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4]
Detailed Analysis
Weight Management
Studies comparing IF to traditional calorie restriction show similar weight loss outcomes. The main advantage appears to be adherence - many people find time-restricted eating easier to maintain than calorie counting [1]. Typical results show 5-8% body weight loss over 12-16 weeks.
Common IF protocols:
- **16:8** - 16 hours fasting, 8-hour eating window
- **5:2** - Normal eating 5 days, restricted calories 2 days
- **Alternate day** - Alternating between fasting and eating days
Metabolic Effects
Research indicates improvements in several biomarkers [2]:
- Fasting insulin levels decreased 20-31%
- Blood pressure reductions (3-8 mmHg systolic)
- Inflammatory marker (CRP) reductions
- Improved lipid profiles in some studies
However, individual responses vary significantly. Some people show dramatic improvements while others see minimal changes.
Potential Mechanisms
Several explanations for observed benefits: 1. **Caloric restriction** - IF naturally reduces total calories 2. **Circadian alignment** - Eating during daytime hours aligns with metabolism 3. **Autophagy** - Cellular cleanup processes activated during fasting 4. **Hormetic stress** - Mild stress that improves adaptation
Safety Considerations
While generally safe for healthy adults, certain groups should avoid IF or proceed with medical supervision [4]:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- People with diabetes (risk of hypoglycemia)
- History of eating disorders
- Children and adolescents
- Those taking medications requiring food
Common side effects during adaptation (1-2 weeks):
- Hunger and irritability
- Headaches
- Fatigue
- Difficulty concentrating
Areas of Consensus
- IF is as effective as traditional diets for weight loss
- Short-term safety is established for healthy adults
- Individual results vary considerably
- Not a magic solution - overall diet quality matters
Areas of Debate
- **Optimal fasting window**: Research shows benefits across different protocols
- **Long-term sustainability**: Most studies are 8-24 weeks; need multi-year data
- **Superiority to other diets**: Unclear if benefits exceed other healthy eating patterns
- **Muscle preservation**: Some concern about muscle loss, bu
A Super AI Lab with massive AI Doctors as Assistants. Best IDE for Research via AI Power.
Other skills on dr-claw.
More skills from other plugins.
browser-use
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…
agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…
Questions about inno-deep-research.
- Which coding agents can use inno-deep-research?
- inno-deep-research installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

