/aris-research-refine-pipeline
Run an end-to-end workflow that chains `aris-research-refine` and `aris-experiment-plan`. Use when the user wants a one-shot pipeline from vague research direction to focused final proposal plus detailed experiment roadmap, or asks to "串起来", build a pipeline, do it end-to-end,
$ npx -y skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill aris-research-refine-pipeline --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/aris-research-refine-pipeline
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Run an end-to-end workflow that chains `aris-research-refine` and `aris-experiment-plan`. Use when the user wants a one-shot pipeline from vague research direction to focused final proposal plus detailed experiment roadmap, or asks to "串起来", build a pipeline, do it end-to-end,
SKILL.md
aris-research-refine-pipeline.SKILL.mdname: aris-research-refine-pipeline
description: 'Run an end-to-end workflow that chains `aris-research-refine` and `aris-experiment-plan`. Use when the user wants a one-shot pipeline from vague research direction to focused final proposal plus detailed experiment roadmap, or asks to "串起来", build a pipeline, do it end-to-end, or generate both the method and experiment plan together.'
allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, WebFetch, Agent, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply
license: MIT
metadata:
author: wanshuiyin/ARIS
version: "1.0.0"
Research Refine Pipeline: End-to-End Method and Experiment Planning
Refine and concretize: **$ARGUMENTS**
Overview
Use this skill when the user does not want to stop at a refined method. The goal is to produce a coherent package that includes:
- a problem-anchored, elegant final proposal
- the review history explaining why the method is focused
- a detailed experiment roadmap tied to the paper's claims
- a compact pipeline summary that says what to run next
This skill composes two existing workflows:
1. `aris-research-refine` for method refinement 2. `aris-experiment-plan` for claim-driven validation planning
For stage-specific detail, read these sibling skills only when needed:
- `../research-refine/SKILL.md`
- `../experiment-plan/SKILL.md`
Core Rule
Do not plan a large experiment suite on top of an unstable method. First stabilize the thesis. Then turn the stable thesis into experiments.
Default Outputs
- `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`
- `refine-logs/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md`
- `refine-logs/REFINEMENT_REPORT.md`
- `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md`
- `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md`
- `refine-logs/PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md`
Workflow
Phase 0: Triage the Starting Point
- Extract the problem, rough approach, constraints, resources, and target venue.
- Check whether `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md` already exists and still matches the current request.
- If the proposal is missing, stale, or materially different from the current request, run the full `aris-research-refine` stage.
- If the proposal is already strong and aligned, reuse it and jump to experiment planning.
- If in doubt, prefer re-running `aris-research-refine` rather than planning experiments for the wrong method.
Phase 1: Method Refinement Stage
Run the `aris-research-refine` workflow and keep its V3 philosophy intact:
- preserve the Problem Anchor
- prefer the smallest adequate mechanism
- keep one dominant contribution
- modernize only when it improves the paper
Exit this stage only when these are explicit:
- the final method thesis
- the dominant contribution
- the complexity intentionally rejected
- the key claims and must-run ablations
- the remaining risks, if any
If the verdict is still `REVISE`, continue into experiment planning only if the remaining weaknesses are clearly documented.
Phase 2: Planning Gate
Before the experiment stage, write a short gate check:
- What is the final method thesis?
- What is the dominant contribution?
- What complexity was intentionally rejected?
- Which reviewer concerns still matter for validation?
- Is a frontier primitive central, optional, or absent?
If these answers are not crisp, tighten the final proposal first.
Phase 3: Experiment Planning Stage
Run the `aris-experiment-plan` workflow grounded in:
- `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`
- `refine-logs/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md`
- `refine-logs/REFINEMENT_REPORT.md`
Ensure the experiment plan covers:
- the main anchor result
- novelty isolation
- a simplicity or deletion check
- a frontier necessity check if applicable
- run order, budget, and decision gates
Phase 4: Integration Summary
Write `refine-logs/PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md`:
# Pipeline Summary
**Problem**: [problem]
**Final Method Thesis**: [one sentence]
**Final Verdict**: [READY / REVISE / RETHINK]
**Date**: [today]
## Final Deliverables
- Proposal: `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`
- Review summary: `refine-logs/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md`
- Experiment plan: `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md`
- Experiment tracker: `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md`
## Contribution Snapshot
- Dominant contribution:
- Optional supporting contribution:
- Explicitly rejected complexity:
## Must-Prove Claims
- [Claim 1]
- [Claim 2]
## First Runs to Launch
1. [Run]
2. [Run]
3. [Run]
## Main Risks
- [Risk]:
- [Mitigation]:
## Next Action
- Proceed to `/aris-run-experiment`
Phase 5: Present a Brief Summary to the User
Pipeline complete.
Method output:
- refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md
Experiment output:
- refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md
- refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md
Pipeline summary:
- refine-logs/PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md
Best next step:
- /aris-run-experiment
Key Rules
- **Large file handling**: If the Write tool fails due to file size, immediately retry using Bash (`cat << 'EOF' > file`) to write in chunks. Do NOT ask the user for permission — just do it silently.
- Do not let the experiment plan override the Problem Anchor.
- Do not widen the paper story after method refinement unless a missing validation block is truly necessary.
- Reuse the same claims across `FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`, `EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md`, and `PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md`.
- Keep the main paper story compact.
- If the method is intentionally simple, defend that simplicity in the experiment plan rather than adding new components.
- If the method uses a modern LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL primitive, make its necessity test explicit.
- If the method does not need a frontier primitive, say that clearly and avoid forcing one.
- Prefer the staged skills when the user only needs one stage; use this skill for the integrated flow.
Composing with Other Skills
/aris-research-refine-pipeline -> one-shot method + experiment planning
/aris-research-refine -> method refinement only
/aris-experiment-plan -> experiment planning only
/aris-run-experiment -> execution
Read more
name: aris-research-refine-pipeline description: 'Run an end-to-end workflow that chains `aris-research-refine` and `aris-experiment-plan`. Use when the user wants a one-shot pipeline from vague research direction to focused final proposal plus detailed experiment roadmap, or asks to "串起来", build a pipeline, do it end-to-end, or generate both the method and experiment plan together.' allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, WebFetch, Agent, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply license: MIT metadata: author: wanshuiyin/ARIS version: "1.0.0"
Research Refine Pipeline: End-to-End Method and Experiment Planning
Refine and concretize: **$ARGUMENTS**
Overview
Use this skill when the user does not want to stop at a refined method. The goal is to produce a coherent package that includes:
- a problem-anchored, elegant final proposal
- the review history explaining why the method is focused
- a detailed experiment roadmap tied to the paper's claims
- a compact pipeline summary that says what to run next
This skill composes two existing workflows:
1. `aris-research-refine` for method refinement 2. `aris-experiment-plan` for claim-driven validation planning
For stage-specific detail, read these sibling skills only when needed:
- `../research-refine/SKILL.md`
- `../experiment-plan/SKILL.md`
Core Rule
Do not plan a large experiment suite on top of an unstable method. First stabilize the thesis. Then turn the stable thesis into experiments.
Default Outputs
- `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`
- `refine-logs/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md`
- `refine-logs/REFINEMENT_REPORT.md`
- `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md`
- `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md`
- `refine-logs/PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md`
Workflow
Phase 0: Triage the Starting Point
- Extract the problem, rough approach, constraints, resources, and target venue.
- Check whether `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md` already exists and still matches the current request.
- If the proposal is missing, stale, or materially different from the current request, run the full `aris-research-refine` stage.
- If the proposal is already strong and aligned, reuse it and jump to experiment planning.
- If in doubt, prefer re-running `aris-research-refine` rather than planning experiments for the wrong method.
Phase 1: Method Refinement Stage
Run the `aris-research-refine` workflow and keep its V3 philosophy intact:
- preserve the Problem Anchor
- prefer the smallest adequate mechanism
- keep one dominant contribution
- modernize only when it improves the paper
Exit this stage only when these are explicit:
- the final method thesis
- the dominant contribution
- the complexity intentionally rejected
- the key claims and must-run ablations
- the remaining risks, if any
If the verdict is still `REVISE`, continue into experiment planning only if the remaining weaknesses are clearly documented.
Phase 2: Planning Gate
Before the experiment stage, write a short gate check:
- What is the final method thesis?
- What is the dominant contribution?
- What complexity was intentionally rejected?
- Which reviewer concerns still matter for validation?
- Is a frontier primitive central, optional, or absent?
If these answers are not crisp, tighten the final proposal first.
Phase 3: Experiment Planning Stage
Run the `aris-experiment-plan` workflow grounded in:
- `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`
- `refine-logs/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md`
- `refine-logs/REFINEMENT_REPORT.md`
Ensure the experiment plan covers:
- the main anchor result
- novelty isolation
- a simplicity or deletion check
- a frontier necessity check if applicable
- run order, budget, and decision gates
Phase 4: Integration Summary
Write `refine-logs/PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md`:
# Pipeline Summary **Problem**: [problem] **Final Method Thesis**: [one sentence] **Final Verdict**: [READY / REVISE / RETHINK] **Date**: [today] ## Final Deliverables - Proposal: `refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md` - Review summary: `refine-logs/REVIEW_SUMMARY.md` - Experiment plan: `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md` - Experiment tracker: `refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md` ## Contribution Snapshot - Dominant contribution: - Optional supporting contribution: - Explicitly rejected complexity: ## Must-Prove Claims - [Claim 1] - [Claim 2] ## First Runs to Launch 1. [Run] 2. [Run] 3. [Run] ## Main Risks - [Risk]: - [Mitigation]: ## Next Action - Proceed to `/aris-run-experiment`
Phase 5: Present a Brief Summary to the User
Pipeline complete. Method output: - refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md Experiment output: - refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md - refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md Pipeline summary: - refine-logs/PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md Best next step: - /aris-run-experiment
Key Rules
- **Large file handling**: If the Write tool fails due to file size, immediately retry using Bash (`cat << 'EOF' > file`) to write in chunks. Do NOT ask the user for permission — just do it silently.
- Do not let the experiment plan override the Problem Anchor.
- Do not widen the paper story after method refinement unless a missing validation block is truly necessary.
- Reuse the same claims across `FINAL_PROPOSAL.md`, `EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md`, and `PIPELINE_SUMMARY.md`.
- Keep the main paper story compact.
- If the method is intentionally simple, defend that simplicity in the experiment plan rather than adding new components.
- If the method uses a modern LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL primitive, make its necessity test explicit.
- If the method does not need a frontier primitive, say that clearly and avoid forcing one.
- Prefer the staged skills when the user only needs one stage; use this skill for the integrated flow.
Composing with Other Skills
/aris-research-refine-pipeline -> one-shot method + experiment planning /aris-research-refine -> method refinement only /aris-experiment-plan -> experiment planning only /aris-run-experiment -> execution
A Super AI Lab with massive AI Doctors as Assistants. Best IDE for Research via AI Power.
Repo: OpenLAIR/dr-claw
Other skills on dr-claw.
- /dr-claw
Dr. Claw skill for OpenClaw project discovery, idea intake, waiting-session triage, structured session control, event-driven notifications, and mobile reporting through the local drclaw CLI.
Open skill - /academic-researcher
Academic research assistant for literature reviews, paper analysis, and scholarly writing. Use when: reviewing academic papers, conducting literature reviews, writing research summaries, analyzing methodologies, formatting citations, or when user mentions academic research,
Open skill - /autogpt
Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.
Open skill - /crewai
Multi-agent orchestration framework for autonomous AI collaboration. Use when building teams of specialized agents working together on complex tasks, when you need role-based agent collaboration with memory, or for production workflows requiring sequential/hierarchical
Open skill - /langchain
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering
Open skill - /llamaindex
Data framework for building LLM applications with RAG. Specializes in document ingestion (300+ connectors), indexing, and querying. Features vector indices, query engines, agents, and multi-modal support. Use for document Q&A, chatbots, knowledge retrieval, or building RAG
Open skill

