/web-api
Build or maintain controller-based ASP.NET Core APIs when the project needs controller conventions, advanced model binding, validation extensions, OData, JsonPatch, or existing API patterns. USE FOR: working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core; needing controller-specific
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill web-api --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/web-api
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Build or maintain controller-based ASP.NET Core APIs when the project needs controller conventions, advanced model binding, validation extensions, OData, JsonPatch, or existing API patterns. USE FOR: working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core; needing controller-specific
SKILL.md
web-api.SKILL.mdname: web-api
description: "Build or maintain controller-based ASP.NET Core APIs when the project needs controller conventions, advanced model binding, validation extensions, OData, JsonPatch, or existing API patterns. USE FOR: working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core; needing controller-specific extensibility or conventions; migrating or reviewing existing API controllers and filters. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made."
compatibility: "Requires an ASP.NET Core API project that uses or should use controllers."
ASP.NET Core Web API
Trigger On
- working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core
- needing controller-specific extensibility or conventions
- migrating or reviewing existing API controllers and filters
Workflow
1. Use controllers when the API needs controller-centric features, not simply because older templates did so. 2. Keep controllers thin: map HTTP concerns to application services or handlers, and avoid embedding data access and business rules directly in actions. 3. Use clear DTO boundaries, explicit validation, and predictable HTTP status behavior. 4. Review authentication and authorization at both controller and endpoint levels so the API surface is not accidentally inconsistent. 5. Keep OpenAPI generation, versioning, and error contract behavior deliberate rather than incidental. 6. Use `minimal-apis` for new simple APIs instead of defaulting to controllers out of habit.
Current Upstream Notes
- `dotnet/aspnetcore` `v10.0.10` is servicing. It fixes nullable `DescriptionAttribute` handling and duplicate generic-property/reference IDs in OpenAPI generation; controller-based API guidance still depends on conventions, advanced model binding, OData, JsonPatch, and existing filters.
- The July 2026 `aspnetcore-10.0` overview keeps controller APIs alongside Minimal APIs rather than replacing them. Use the dedicated routing, OpenAPI, auth, and hosting pages before changing public API contracts.
Deliver
- controller APIs with explicit contracts and policies
- reduced controller bloat
- tests or smoke checks for critical API behavior
Validate
- controller features are actually justified
- actions do not hide business logic and persistence details
- HTTP semantics stay predictable across endpoints
Controller Structure
Use primary constructors (C# 12+) for dependency injection and keep controllers focused on HTTP concerns:
[ApiController]
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class OrdersController(
IOrderService orderService,
ILogger<OrdersController> logger) : ControllerBase
{
[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
[ProducesResponseType<OrderDto>(StatusCodes.Status200OK)]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound)]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetById(Guid id, CancellationToken ct)
{
var order = await orderService.GetByIdAsync(id, ct);
return order is null ? NotFound() : Ok(order);
}
[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType<OrderDto>(StatusCodes.Status201Created)]
[ProducesResponseType<ValidationProblemDetails>(StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest)]
public async Task<IActionResult> Create(CreateOrderRequest request, CancellationToken ct)
{
var order = await orderService.CreateAsync(request, ct);
return CreatedAtAction(nameof(GetById), new { id = order.Id }, order);
}
}Model Binding
Explicitly declare binding sources for clarity:
[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetWithOptions(
[FromRoute] Guid id,
[FromQuery] bool includeDeleted = false,
[FromHeader(Name = "X-Correlation-Id")] string? correlationId = null,
CancellationToken ct = default)
{
// Route: id, Query: includeDeleted, Header: X-Correlation-Id
}Use record types with required members for request DTOs:
public record CreateProductRequest
{
public required string Name { get; init; }
public required decimal Price { get; init; }
public string? Description { get; init; }
public IReadOnlyList<string> Tags { get; init; } = [];
}Validation
Prefer FluentValidation for complex validation rules:
public class CreateOrderRequestValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateOrderRequest>
{
public CreateOrderRequestValidator(IProductRepository products)
{
RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId)
.NotEmpty()
.WithMessage("Customer ID is required");
RuleFor(x => x.Items)
.NotEmpty()
.WithMessage("Order must contain at least one item");
RuleForEach(x => x.Items).ChildRules(item =>
{
item.RuleFor(i => i.ProductId)
.NotEmpty()
.MustAsync(async (id, ct) => await products.ExistsAsync(id, ct))
.WithMessage("Product does not exist");
item.RuleFor(i => i.Quantity)
.GreaterThan(0)
.LessThanOrEqualTo(100);
});
}
}Configure consistent Problem Details responses:
builder.Services.Configure<ApiBehaviorOptions>(options =>
{
options.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory = context =>
{
var problemDetails = new ValidationProblemDetails(context.ModelState)
{
Type = "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.5.1",
Title = "One or more validation errors occurred.",
Status = StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest,
Instance = context.HttpContext.Request.Path
};
return new BadRequestObjectResult(problemDetails);
};
});API Versioning
Configure URL path versioning:
builder.Services.AddApiVersioning(options =>
{
options.DefaultApiVersion = new ApiVersion(1, 0);
options.AssumeDefaultVersionWhenUnspecified = true;
optionRead more
name: web-api description: "Build or maintain controller-based ASP.NET Core APIs when the project needs controller conventions, advanced model binding, validation extensions, OData, JsonPatch, or existing API patterns. USE FOR: working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core; needing controller-specific extensibility or conventions; migrating or reviewing existing API controllers and filters. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made." compatibility: "Requires an ASP.NET Core API project that uses or should use controllers."
ASP.NET Core Web API
Trigger On
- working on controller-based APIs in ASP.NET Core
- needing controller-specific extensibility or conventions
- migrating or reviewing existing API controllers and filters
Workflow
1. Use controllers when the API needs controller-centric features, not simply because older templates did so. 2. Keep controllers thin: map HTTP concerns to application services or handlers, and avoid embedding data access and business rules directly in actions. 3. Use clear DTO boundaries, explicit validation, and predictable HTTP status behavior. 4. Review authentication and authorization at both controller and endpoint levels so the API surface is not accidentally inconsistent. 5. Keep OpenAPI generation, versioning, and error contract behavior deliberate rather than incidental. 6. Use `minimal-apis` for new simple APIs instead of defaulting to controllers out of habit.
Current Upstream Notes
- `dotnet/aspnetcore` `v10.0.10` is servicing. It fixes nullable `DescriptionAttribute` handling and duplicate generic-property/reference IDs in OpenAPI generation; controller-based API guidance still depends on conventions, advanced model binding, OData, JsonPatch, and existing filters.
- The July 2026 `aspnetcore-10.0` overview keeps controller APIs alongside Minimal APIs rather than replacing them. Use the dedicated routing, OpenAPI, auth, and hosting pages before changing public API contracts.
Deliver
- controller APIs with explicit contracts and policies
- reduced controller bloat
- tests or smoke checks for critical API behavior
Validate
- controller features are actually justified
- actions do not hide business logic and persistence details
- HTTP semantics stay predictable across endpoints
Controller Structure
Use primary constructors (C# 12+) for dependency injection and keep controllers focused on HTTP concerns:
[ApiController]
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class OrdersController(
IOrderService orderService,
ILogger<OrdersController> logger) : ControllerBase
{
[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
[ProducesResponseType<OrderDto>(StatusCodes.Status200OK)]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound)]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetById(Guid id, CancellationToken ct)
{
var order = await orderService.GetByIdAsync(id, ct);
return order is null ? NotFound() : Ok(order);
}
[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType<OrderDto>(StatusCodes.Status201Created)]
[ProducesResponseType<ValidationProblemDetails>(StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest)]
public async Task<IActionResult> Create(CreateOrderRequest request, CancellationToken ct)
{
var order = await orderService.CreateAsync(request, ct);
return CreatedAtAction(nameof(GetById), new { id = order.Id }, order);
}
}Model Binding
Explicitly declare binding sources for clarity:
[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetWithOptions(
[FromRoute] Guid id,
[FromQuery] bool includeDeleted = false,
[FromHeader(Name = "X-Correlation-Id")] string? correlationId = null,
CancellationToken ct = default)
{
// Route: id, Query: includeDeleted, Header: X-Correlation-Id
}Use record types with required members for request DTOs:
public record CreateProductRequest
{
public required string Name { get; init; }
public required decimal Price { get; init; }
public string? Description { get; init; }
public IReadOnlyList<string> Tags { get; init; } = [];
}Validation
Prefer FluentValidation for complex validation rules:
public class CreateOrderRequestValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateOrderRequest>
{
public CreateOrderRequestValidator(IProductRepository products)
{
RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId)
.NotEmpty()
.WithMessage("Customer ID is required");
RuleFor(x => x.Items)
.NotEmpty()
.WithMessage("Order must contain at least one item");
RuleForEach(x => x.Items).ChildRules(item =>
{
item.RuleFor(i => i.ProductId)
.NotEmpty()
.MustAsync(async (id, ct) => await products.ExistsAsync(id, ct))
.WithMessage("Product does not exist");
item.RuleFor(i => i.Quantity)
.GreaterThan(0)
.LessThanOrEqualTo(100);
});
}
}Configure consistent Problem Details responses:
builder.Services.Configure<ApiBehaviorOptions>(options =>
{
options.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory = context =>
{
var problemDetails = new ValidationProblemDetails(context.ModelState)
{
Type = "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.5.1",
Title = "One or more validation errors occurred.",
Status = StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest,
Instance = context.HttpContext.Request.Path
};
return new BadRequestObjectResult(problemDetails);
};
});API Versioning
Configure URL path versioning:
builder.Services.AddApiVersioning(options =>
{
options.DefaultApiVersion = new ApiVersion(1, 0);
options.AssumeDefaultVersionWhenUnspecified = true;
optionStop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Other skills on dotnet-skills.
- /aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration,
Open skill - /aspire
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.4.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing, MCP, and deployment patterns for distributed apps. USE FOR: Aspire.AppHost.Sdk, Aspire.Hosting.*,
Open skill - /azure-functions
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable
Open skill - /blazor
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and hosting choices. USE FOR: building interactive web UIs with C# instead of JavaScript; choosing between Server, WebAssembly, or
Open skill - /entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access
Open skill - /entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and
Open skill

