Skip to content
Development
Skill

/diffdock

Diffusion-based docking that predicts protein-ligand poses without a predefined site. Use for blind docking, when traditional docking fails, or exploring multiple binding modes. Pipeline: prep protein (PDB) and ligand (SMILES/SDF), run inference, analyze confidence-ranked poses.

From plugin
sciagent-skills
384200 skills

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills --skill diffdock --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

diffdock.SKILL.md
name: "diffdock"
description: "Diffusion-based docking that predicts protein-ligand poses without a predefined site. Use for blind docking, when traditional docking fails, or exploring multiple binding modes. Pipeline: prep protein (PDB) and ligand (SMILES/SDF), run inference, analyze confidence-ranked poses."
license: "MIT"

diffdock

Overview

DiffDock uses a diffusion generative model to predict protein-ligand binding poses directly from protein structure and ligand SMILES, treating docking as a generative rather than a search problem. Unlike traditional docking tools (AutoDock Vina, Glide), DiffDock does not require a predefined binding site — it samples poses across the full protein surface. It outputs a ranked set of binding poses with associated confidence scores. DiffDock excels at blind docking tasks and produces diverse pose hypotheses, making it valuable for de novo binding site discovery and challenging targets.

When to Use

  • **Blind docking (unknown binding site)**: You do not know where on the protein the ligand binds and want to discover candidate binding sites.
  • **Challenging targets that fail traditional docking**: Allosteric sites, flexible regions, or proteins without a co-crystal structure in the target binding site.
  • **Exploring multiple binding modes**: Generating a diverse ensemble of poses to understand conformational flexibility in the binding event.
  • **Structure-activity relationship (SAR) exploration**: Rapidly docking a series of analogs to compare predicted binding modes.
  • **Fragment screening hypothesis generation**: Identifying plausible binding sites for fragment molecules.
  • For known binding sites with rigid protein assumptions, AutoDock Vina or GNINA may be faster and equally accurate.
  • For large-scale virtual screening (>10,000 compounds), consider GNINA or DiffDock-L (the large-scale version) rather than standard DiffDock.
  • Use **AutoDock Vina** instead when the binding pocket is well-defined and faster throughput is needed for large compound libraries

Prerequisites

  • **Python packages**: `diffdock` (conda install recommended), `rdkit`, `torch`, `biopython`, `nglview` (visualization)
  • **System**: GPU strongly recommended (NVIDIA CUDA); CPU inference is slow (~5-10 min/compound)
  • **Data requirements**: Protein PDB file (cleaned, protonated), ligand as SMILES string or SDF file
  • **Environment**: conda environment with CUDA-compatible PyTorch
# Recommended: clone and install from source
git clone https://github.com/gcorso/DiffDock.git
cd DiffDock
conda create -n diffdock python=3.9
conda activate diffdock
pip install torch torchvision --extra-index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu118
pip install -r requirements.txt

# Download pretrained model weights
python -c "from utils.download import download_pretrained; download_pretrained()"

Workflow

Step 1: Prepare the Protein Structure

from Bio import PDB
from Bio.PDB import PDBParser, PDBIO, Select

class NonHetSelect(Select):
    """Remove HETATM records (ligands, water) — keep only protein atoms."""
    def accept_residue(self, residue):
        return residue.id[0] == " "

def clean_pdb(input_pdb: str, output_pdb: str):
    parser = PDBParser(QUIET=True)
    structure = parser.get_structure("protein", input_pdb)
    io = PDBIO()
    io.set_structure(structure)
    io.save(output_pdb, NonHetSelect())
    print(f"Cleaned PDB saved to: {output_pdb}")

clean_pdb("raw_protein.pdb", "protein_clean.pdb")

Step 2: Prepare the Ligand Input

from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import AllChem, SDWriter

def smiles_to_sdf(smiles: str, output_sdf: str, n_confs: int = 1):
    """Convert SMILES to 3D SDF for DiffDock input."""
    mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smiles)
    mol = Chem.AddHs(mol)
    AllChem.EmbedMolecule(mol, AllChem.ETKDGv3())
    AllChem.MMFFOptimizeMolecule(mol)
    writer = SDWriter(output_sdf)
    writer.write(mol)
    writer.close()
    print(f"Ligand SDF written to: {output_sdf}")
    return mol

# Example: ibuprofen
smiles = "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O"
mol    = smiles_to_sdf(smiles, "ligand.sdf")
print(f"Ligand formula: {Chem.rdMolDescriptors.CalcMolFormula(mol)}")

Step 3: Run DiffDock Inference

# Command-line inference (run from the DiffDock directory)
python inference.py \
    --protein_path protein_clean.pdb \
    --ligand       "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O" \
    --out_dir      results/ \
    --inference_steps 20 \
    --samples_per_complex 40 \
    --batch_size 10 \
    --no_final_step_noise
import subprocess

def run_diffdock(protein_pdb: str, ligand_smiles: str, out_dir: str,
                 n_samples: int = 40, n_steps: int = 20):
    cmd = [
        "python", "inference.py",
        "--protein_path",      protein_pdb,
        "--ligand",            ligand_smiles,
        "--out_dir",           out_dir,
        "--inference_steps",   str(n_steps),
        "--samples_per_complex", str(n_samples),
        "--batch_size",        "10",
        "--no_final_step_noise",
    ]
    result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, cwd="DiffDock/")
    if result.returncode == 0:
        print(f"DiffDock complete. Results in: {out_dir}")
    else:
        print(f"Error: {result.stderr}")
    return result

run_diffdock("protein_clean.pdb", "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O", "results/")

Step 4: Parse and Rank Confidence Scores

import re
from pathlib import Path
import pandas as pd

def parse_diffdock_results(out_dir: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    """Parse DiffDock output SDF files and confidence scores."""
    out_path = Path(out_dir)
    records  = []

    # DiffDock names output files: rank{N}_confidence{score}.sdf
    for sdf_file in sorted(out_path.glob("rank*_confidence*.sdf")):
        name = sdf_file.stem
        # Extract rank and confidence from filename
        rank_match = re.search(r"rank(\d+)", name)
        conf_match = re.search(r"confidence(-?[\d
Read more
@jaechang-hits
Ships withsciagent-skills

Turn your AI coding agent into a life sciences expert — 199 bioinformatics skills for Claude Code covering RNA-seq, single-cell analysis, genomics, proteomics, drug discovery, and more. Boosted BixBench from 65% to 92%. Open source.

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
384
Star history of jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on sciagent-skills.

More skills from other plugins.

brainstorming
Auto-invoked

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…

@obra@obraInstall Skill
ask-matt

ask-matt

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

skills11d309k
@mattpocock@mattpocockInstall Skill
accessibility
Auto-invoked

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels,…

ecc12d293k
@affaan-m@affaan-mInstall Skill
compiler-commit

compiler-commit

Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits…

react2d252k
@facebook@facebookInstall Skill

Questions about diffdock.

Which coding agents can use diffdock?
diffdock installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.