engage.actions
Execute Phase 7 - Actions on Objectives and Goal Achievement
Execute Phase 2 - Weaponization and Payload Development
> /plugin marketplace add hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude > /plugin install offensive-claude@offensive-claude-marketplace
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/engage.weaponizeContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Execute Phase 2 - Weaponization and Payload Development
description: Execute Phase 2 - Weaponization and Payload Development
Executes Phase 2 (Weaponization) of the engagement workflow.
`/engage.weaponize [--target <vulnerability>] [--payload-type <type>]`
Options:
Loads:
Reviews reconnaissance output and prompts:
Populates `exploit-blueprint.md` with:
**Vulnerability Analysis**:
**Exploitation Strategy**:
**Payload Requirements**:
Populates `payload-config.md` with:
**Payload Specifications**:
**C2 Configuration**:
**Evasion Techniques**:
**OPSEC Considerations**:
Offers to invoke relevant skills:
Validates:
If gate passes, suggests: `/engage.deliver` or `/engage.exploit` (depending on workflow)
Starting Phase 2: Weaponization Reviewing reconnaissance findings... Found 3 potential targets: 1. CVE-2024-1234 - Nginx 1.21.0 RCE (admin.acme-corp.com) 2. Exposed RDP - Windows Server 2019 (rdp.acme-corp.com) 3. Outdated WordPress - Multiple plugins (blog.acme-corp.com) Which target would you like to weaponize? > 1 Target: CVE-2024-1234 (Nginx 1.21.0 RCE) Exploitation goal? > Initial access to web server Designing exploit... Vulnerability Analysis: - CVE-2024-1234: Buffer overflow in Nginx request parsing - Affects: Nginx 1.21.0 - 1.21.3 - Public exploit: Yes (Metasploit module available) - Reliability: High (90%+ success rate) Exploitation Strategy: - Attack vector: Network (HTTP request) - Technique: Stack buffer overflow → RIP control - Mitigations present: ASLR, NX/DEP - Bypass: Information leak + ROP chain Payload Requirements: - Type: Reverse shell (staged) - Format: Linux x64 shellcode - Size constraint: 2048 bytes max - Persistence: Not required for initial access C2 Configuration: What is your callback IP/domain? > attacker.example.com Callback port? > 443 Payload configuration complete. OPSEC Considerations: - Network indicator: HTTPS callback to attacker.example.com - Host artifact: /tmp/.shell socket file - Recommendation: Use domain fronting or redirector Weaponization complete. Running gate validation... ✓ Phase 2 (Weaponization) gate validation PASSED Ready to proceed to Phase 3 (Delivery). Run: /engage.deliver
Proper weaponization considers target environment, mitigations, and OPSEC. Always test payloads in a lab environment before deployment.
A spec-driven offensive security framework for Claude Code — structured engagement workflows based on the Cyber Kill Chain, 31 kill-chain skills (multi-file progressive-disclosure) plus a discipline layer (a SessionStart dispatcher + 6 process/discipline
Repo: hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude
Execute Phase 7 - Actions on Objectives and Goal Achievement
Crash → root cause → reachability → empirical exploitability verdict (native bugs)
Find the canonical fix commit(s) for a CVE across sources, then diff for root cause