Skip to content
Marketing
Skill

/forecast-scenarios

Model best-case, worst-case, and likely revenue scenarios with sensitivity analysis for strategic planning. Use when: building financial forecasts; presenting board scenarios; planning headcount around revenue uncertainty; modeling pricing changes impact; preparing investor

From plugin
clawfu-skills
150175 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill forecast-scenarios --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/forecast-scenarios

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Model best-case, worst-case, and likely revenue scenarios with sensitivity analysis for strategic planning. Use when: building financial forecasts; presenting board scenarios; planning headcount around revenue uncertainty; modeling pricing changes impact; preparing investor

SKILL.md

forecast-scenarios.SKILL.md
name: forecast-scenarios
description: "Model best-case, worst-case, and likely revenue scenarios with sensitivity analysis for strategic planning. Use when: building financial forecasts; presenting board scenarios; planning headcount around revenue uncertainty; modeling pricing changes impact; preparing investor updates with upside/downside ranges"
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: ClawFu
  version: 1.0.0
  mcp-server: "@clawfu/mcp-skills"

Forecast Scenario Modeling

> Create multiple revenue scenarios with variable assumptions to support strategic planning, board presentations, and risk management.

When to Use This Skill

  • Annual and quarterly planning
  • Board meeting preparations
  • Fundraising projections
  • Risk assessment and contingency planning
  • Evaluating strategic initiatives

Methodology Foundation

Based on **McKinsey Scenario Planning** and **FP&A best practices**, combining:

  • Base/Bull/Bear case modeling
  • Sensitivity analysis (variable impact)
  • Monte Carlo probability distributions
  • Driver-based forecasting

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

| Claude Does | You Decide | |-------------|------------| | Structures scenario framework | Assumption values | | Calculates scenario outcomes | Which scenario to plan for | | Identifies key sensitivities | Risk tolerance levels | | Models variable impacts | Strategic responses | | Presents range of outcomes | Final forecast commitment |

What This Skill Does

1. **Scenario definition** - Base, upside, downside cases 2. **Variable modeling** - Test impact of changing assumptions 3. **Sensitivity analysis** - Which variables matter most 4. **Probability weighting** - Expected value calculations 5. **Action planning** - What to do in each scenario

How to Use

Model revenue scenarios for [Period]:

Current Status:
- YTD Revenue: $X
- Current Pipeline: $X
- Run Rate: $X/month

Key Variables to Model:
- Win rate: [Current: X%, Range: X-X%]
- Average deal size: [Current: $X, Range: $X-$X]
- Sales cycle: [Current: X days, Range: X-X]
- New pipeline creation: [Current: $X/month]
- Churn rate: [Current: X%]

Create best, likely, and worst case scenarios.

Instructions

Step 1: Define Scenario Framework

| Scenario | Definition | Probability | |----------|------------|-------------| | **Best Case** (Bull) | Everything goes right | 15-20% | | **Likely Case** (Base) | Realistic expectations | 50-60% | | **Worst Case** (Bear) | Major headwinds | 20-25% |

Step 2: Identify Key Drivers

Rank variables by revenue impact:

| Driver | Impact | Controllability | |--------|--------|-----------------| | Win rate | High | Medium | | Pipeline volume | High | High | | Deal size | Medium | Low | | Sales cycle | Medium | Medium | | Churn rate | Medium | Medium | | Pricing | Low | High |

Step 3: Set Variable Ranges

For each driver, define realistic bounds:

Win Rate:
- Best: 35% (team is hitting stride)
- Likely: 25% (current performance)
- Worst: 18% (market headwinds)

Pipeline:
- Best: $5M (strong marketing)
- Likely: $4M (normal cadence)
- Worst: $2.5M (budget cuts)

Step 4: Calculate Scenarios

**Revenue Formula (simplified):**

Quarterly Revenue =
  (Pipeline × Win Rate) +
  (Expansion Revenue) -
  (Churn)

**Apply to each scenario:**

Best Case:
$5M × 35% = $1.75M new + $200K expansion - $50K churn
= $1.9M

Likely Case:
$4M × 25% = $1M new + $150K expansion - $80K churn
= $1.07M

Worst Case:
$2.5M × 18% = $450K new + $100K expansion - $120K churn
= $430K

Step 5: Sensitivity Analysis

Test: "What if X changes by 10%?"

| Variable | +10% Impact | -10% Impact | Sensitivity | |----------|-------------|-------------|-------------| | Win Rate | +$100K | -$100K | High | | Pipeline | +$90K | -$90K | High | | Deal Size | +$50K | -$50K | Medium | | Churn | -$30K | +$30K | Medium |

Step 6: Calculate Expected Value

Expected Revenue =
  (Best × Probability) +
  (Likely × Probability) +
  (Worst × Probability)

= ($1.9M × 20%) + ($1.07M × 55%) + ($430K × 25%)
= $380K + $589K + $108K
= $1.077M

Examples

Example 1: Quarterly Forecast Scenarios

**Input:**

Model Q2 scenarios:

Current Status:
- Q1 Revenue: $850K
- Q2 Pipeline: $4.2M
- Monthly run rate: $280K

Variables:
- Win rate: Current 24%, Range 18-32%
- Avg deal: Current $45K, Range $38K-$55K
- New monthly pipeline: Current $800K, Range $500K-$1.2M
- Monthly churn: Current $25K, Range $15K-$40K
- Expansion: Current $50K/month, Range $30K-$80K

**Output:**

## Q2 Revenue Scenario Model

### Scenario Definitions

| Scenario | Probability | Description |
|----------|-------------|-------------|
| 🐂 Bull | 20% | Strong execution, market tailwinds |
| 📊 Base | 55% | Continue current trajectory |
| 🐻 Bear | 25% | Market slowdown, execution challenges |

### Variable Assumptions

| Variable | Bear | Base | Bull |
|----------|------|------|------|
| Starting Pipeline | $4.2M | $4.2M | $4.2M |
| Win Rate | 18% | 24% | 32% |
| Avg Deal Size | $38K | $45K | $55K |
| New Pipeline/mo | $500K | $800K | $1.2M |
| Monthly Churn | $40K | $25K | $15K |
| Expansion/mo | $30K | $50K | $80K |

### Q2 Revenue Calculations

#### 🐂 Bull Case: $1.42M

Starting Pipeline Revenue: $4.2M × 32% = $1.34M

Adjustment for deal size: $1.34M × ($55K/$45K) = $1.64M effective

New Pipeline Added (Q2): $1.2M × 3 months × 32% × 50% (partial close) = $576K

Expansion: $80K × 3 = $240K

Churn: -$15K × 3 = -$45K

Total Bull: $1.64M (existing) + $576K (new) + $240K (exp) - $45K (churn) Weighted at Q2 stage: $1.42M


#### 📊 Base Case: $980K

Starting Pipeline Revenue: $4.2M × 24% = $1.01M

New Pipeline (partial close): $800K × 3 × 24% × 50% = $288K

Expansion: $150K Churn: -$75K

Total Base: $1.01M × 0.9 (timing) + $150K - $75K = $980K


#### 🐻 Bear Case: $580K

Starting Pipeline Revenue: $4.2M × 18% = $756K × 0.85 (pushed deals) = $643K

New Pipeline: $500K × 3 × 18% × 40% = $108K Expansion: $90K Churn: -$120K

Tota

Read more
Ships withclawfu-skills

175 expert marketing methodologies for AI agents. Free. Open source. MIT licensed. Dunford on positioning. Schwartz on copywriting. Cialdini on persuasion. Ogilvy on advertising. Hormozi on offers. Voss on negotiation.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on clawfu-skills.