/kiro-verify-completion
Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add gotalab/cc-sdd --skill kiro-verify-completion -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
kiro-verify-completion.SKILL.mdname: kiro-verify-completion
description: Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.
kiro-verify-completion
<background_information> This skill prevents false completion claims. A task, fix, or feature is only complete when supported by fresh evidence that matches the scope of the claim. </background_information>
<instructions>
When to Use
- Before saying a task is complete
- Before saying a bug is fixed
- Before saying tests pass
- Before moving to the next task in autonomous execution
- Before reporting `GO` from feature-level validation
- Before trusting another subagent's success report
Do not use this skill for early planning or speculative status updates.
Inputs
Provide:
- The exact claim to verify
- Claim type:
- `TASK`
- `FIX`
- `TEST_OR_BUILD`
- `FEATURE_GO`
- Validation commands discovered by the controller
- Fresh command output and exit codes
- Relevant task IDs, requirement IDs, and design refs where applicable
- For feature-level claims:
- requirements coverage status
- design alignment status
- integration status
- blocked task status
Outputs
Return one of:
- `VERIFIED`
- `NOT_VERIFIED`
- `MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED`
Also return:
- Claim reviewed
- Evidence used
- Scope/evidence mismatch, if any
Use the language specified in `spec.json`.
Gate Function
1. Identify the exact claim. 2. Identify the exact command or checklist that proves that claim. 3. Require fresh evidence from the current code state. 4. Check exit code, failure count, skipped scope, and missing coverage. 5. Reject claims that are broader than the evidence. 6. If mandatory validation cannot be completed, return `MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED`. 7. Only then allow the claim.
Claim-Specific Rules
TASK
Require:
- task-local verification evidence
- no unresolved blocking findings from review
- evidence aligned with the task boundary
FIX
Require:
- evidence that the original symptom is resolved
- no broader regressions in the relevant verification scope
TEST_OR_BUILD
Require:
- actual command output
- exit code
- no inference from unrelated checks
FEATURE_GO
Require:
- full test suite result
- runtime smoke boot result showing the built artifact reaches its first usable state
- requirements coverage assessment
- cross-task integration assessment
- design end-to-end alignment assessment
- blocked tasks assessment
A passing test suite alone is not enough for `FEATURE_GO`.
Stop / Escalate
Return `MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED` when:
- No canonical validation command is known
- The required environment is unavailable
- A mandatory manual verification step cannot be executed
Return `NOT_VERIFIED` when:
- The command failed
- Evidence is stale
- Evidence is partial
- The claim exceeds the evidence
- The feature still has unresolved blocked tasks or uncovered requirements
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | “The subagent said it succeeded” | Reported success is not verification evidence. | | “Tests passed earlier” | Fresh evidence only. | | “Build should be fine because lint passed” | Lint does not prove build success. | | “Tests passed and build succeeded, so it must run” | Type erasure, module loading, native ABI, and boot-time config issues can still fail at runtime. | | “The feature is done because all tasks are checked off” | `FEATURE_GO` also requires coverage, integration, and design alignment. |
Output Format
## Verification Result
- STATUS: VERIFIED | NOT_VERIFIED | MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED
- CLAIM_TYPE: TASK | FIX | TEST_OR_BUILD | FEATURE_GO
- CLAIM: <exact claim>
- EVIDENCE: <command/checklist and result>
- GAPS: <scope/evidence mismatch or missing validation>
- NOTES: <next action if not verified>
</instructions>
Read more
name: kiro-verify-completion description: Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.
kiro-verify-completion
<background_information> This skill prevents false completion claims. A task, fix, or feature is only complete when supported by fresh evidence that matches the scope of the claim. </background_information>
<instructions>
When to Use
- Before saying a task is complete
- Before saying a bug is fixed
- Before saying tests pass
- Before moving to the next task in autonomous execution
- Before reporting `GO` from feature-level validation
- Before trusting another subagent's success report
Do not use this skill for early planning or speculative status updates.
Inputs
Provide:
- The exact claim to verify
- Claim type:
- `TASK`
- `FIX`
- `TEST_OR_BUILD`
- `FEATURE_GO`
- Validation commands discovered by the controller
- Fresh command output and exit codes
- Relevant task IDs, requirement IDs, and design refs where applicable
- For feature-level claims:
- requirements coverage status
- design alignment status
- integration status
- blocked task status
Outputs
Return one of:
- `VERIFIED`
- `NOT_VERIFIED`
- `MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED`
Also return:
- Claim reviewed
- Evidence used
- Scope/evidence mismatch, if any
Use the language specified in `spec.json`.
Gate Function
1. Identify the exact claim. 2. Identify the exact command or checklist that proves that claim. 3. Require fresh evidence from the current code state. 4. Check exit code, failure count, skipped scope, and missing coverage. 5. Reject claims that are broader than the evidence. 6. If mandatory validation cannot be completed, return `MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED`. 7. Only then allow the claim.
Claim-Specific Rules
TASK
Require:
- task-local verification evidence
- no unresolved blocking findings from review
- evidence aligned with the task boundary
FIX
Require:
- evidence that the original symptom is resolved
- no broader regressions in the relevant verification scope
TEST_OR_BUILD
Require:
- actual command output
- exit code
- no inference from unrelated checks
FEATURE_GO
Require:
- full test suite result
- runtime smoke boot result showing the built artifact reaches its first usable state
- requirements coverage assessment
- cross-task integration assessment
- design end-to-end alignment assessment
- blocked tasks assessment
A passing test suite alone is not enough for `FEATURE_GO`.
Stop / Escalate
Return `MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED` when:
- No canonical validation command is known
- The required environment is unavailable
- A mandatory manual verification step cannot be executed
Return `NOT_VERIFIED` when:
- The command failed
- Evidence is stale
- Evidence is partial
- The claim exceeds the evidence
- The feature still has unresolved blocked tasks or uncovered requirements
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | “The subagent said it succeeded” | Reported success is not verification evidence. | | “Tests passed earlier” | Fresh evidence only. | | “Build should be fine because lint passed” | Lint does not prove build success. | | “Tests passed and build succeeded, so it must run” | Type erasure, module loading, native ABI, and boot-time config issues can still fail at runtime. | | “The feature is done because all tasks are checked off” | `FEATURE_GO` also requires coverage, integration, and design alignment. |
Output Format
## Verification Result - STATUS: VERIFIED | NOT_VERIFIED | MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED - CLAIM_TYPE: TASK | FIX | TEST_OR_BUILD | FEATURE_GO - CLAIM: <exact claim> - EVIDENCE: <command/checklist and result> - GAPS: <scope/evidence mismatch or missing validation> - NOTES: <next action if not verified>
</instructions>
Other skills on cc-sdd.
More skills from other plugins.
conductor-implement
Executes the tasks defined in the specified track's plan. Use this to start or continue working on a feature, bug fix, or chore.
backprop
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch…
deep-discuss
结构化深度讨论 Skill,用于与用户进行多轮问题分析和方案设计。当用户描述一个问题现象、故障表现、 技术困惑、方案选择困难,或明确说"讨论一下"、"帮我分析"、"我遇到一个问题"、"你觉得怎么样"、 "帮我想想"、"我在纠结"时,必须使用本…
Questions about kiro-verify-completion.
- Which coding agents can use kiro-verify-completion?
- kiro-verify-completion installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

