workflow-startup-mvp
A step-by-step example of how to coordinate multiple agents to go from idea to shipped MVP.
How it fires
How this agent gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this agent.
A step-by-step example of how to coordinate multiple agents to go from idea to shipped MVP.
Agent definition
workflow-startup-mvp.mdMulti-Agent Workflow: Startup MVP
> A step-by-step example of how to coordinate multiple agents to go from idea to shipped MVP.
The Scenario
You're building a SaaS MVP — a team retrospective tool for remote teams. You have 4 weeks to ship a working product with user signups, a core feature, and a landing page.
Agent Team
| Agent | Role in this workflow | |-------|---------------------| | Sprint Prioritizer | Break the project into weekly sprints | | UX Researcher | Validate the idea with quick user interviews | | Backend Architect | Design the API and data model | | Frontend Developer | Build the React app | | Rapid Prototyper | Get the first version running fast | | Growth Hacker | Plan launch strategy while building | | Reality Checker | Gate each milestone before moving on |
The Workflow
Week 1: Discovery + Architecture
**Step 1 — Activate Sprint Prioritizer**
Activate Sprint Prioritizer.
Project: RetroBoard — a real-time team retrospective tool for remote teams.
Timeline: 4 weeks to MVP launch.
Core features: user auth, create retro boards, add cards, vote, action items.
Constraints: solo developer, React + Node.js stack, deploy to Vercel + Railway.
Break this into 4 weekly sprints with clear deliverables and acceptance criteria.
**Step 2 — Activate UX Researcher (in parallel)**
Activate UX Researcher.
I'm building a team retrospective tool for remote teams (5-20 people).
Competitors: EasyRetro, Retrium, Parabol.
Run a quick competitive analysis and identify:
1. What features are table stakes
2. Where competitors fall short
3. One differentiator we could own
Output a 1-page research brief.
**Step 3 — Hand off to Backend Architect**
Activate Backend Architect.
Here's our sprint plan: [paste Sprint Prioritizer output]
Here's our research brief: [paste UX Researcher output]
Design the API and database schema for RetroBoard.
Stack: Node.js, Express, PostgreSQL, Socket.io for real-time.
Deliver:
1. Database schema (SQL)
2. REST API endpoints list
3. WebSocket events for real-time board updates
4. Auth strategy recommendation
Week 2: Build Core Features
**Step 4 — Activate Frontend Developer + Rapid Prototyper**
Activate Frontend Developer.
Here's the API spec: [paste Backend Architect output]
Build the RetroBoard React app:
- Stack: React, TypeScript, Tailwind, Socket.io-client
- Pages: Login, Dashboard, Board view
- Components: RetroCard, VoteButton, ActionItem, BoardColumn
Start with the Board view — it's the core experience.
Focus on real-time: when one user adds a card, everyone sees it.
**Step 5 — Reality Check at midpoint**
Activate Reality Checker.
We're at week 2 of a 4-week MVP build for RetroBoard.
Here's what we have so far:
- Database schema: [paste]
- API endpoints: [paste]
- Frontend components: [paste]
Evaluate:
1. Can we realistically ship in 2 more weeks?
2. What should we cut to make the deadline?
3. Any technical debt that will bite us at launch?
Week 3: Polish + Landing Page
**Step 6 — Frontend Developer continues, Growth Hacker starts**
Activate Growth Hacker.
Product: RetroBoard — team retrospective tool, launching in 1 week.
Target: Engineering managers and scrum masters at remote-first companies.
Budget: $0 (organic launch only).
Create a launch plan:
1. Landing page copy (hero, features, CTA)
2. Launch channels (Product Hunt, Reddit, Hacker News, Twitter)
3. Day-by-day launch sequence
4. Metrics to track in week 1
Week 4: Launch
**Step 7 — Final Reality Check**
Activate Reality Checker.
RetroBoard is ready to launch. Evaluate production readiness:
- Live URL: [url]
- Test accounts created: yes
- Error monitoring: Sentry configured
- Database backups: daily automated
Run through the launch checklist and give a GO / NO-GO decision.
Require evidence for each criterion.
Key Patterns
1. **Sequential handoffs**: Each agent's output becomes the next agent's input 2. **Parallel work**: UX Researcher and Sprint Prioritizer can run simultaneously in Week 1 3. **Quality gates**: Reality Checker at midpoint and before launch prevents shipping broken code 4. **Context passing**: Always paste previous agent outputs into the next prompt — agents don't share memory
Tips
- Copy-paste agent outputs between steps — don't summarize, use the full output
- If a Reality Checker flags an issue, loop back to the relevant specialist to fix it
- Keep the Orchestrator agent in mind for automating this flow once you're comfortable with the manual version
Read more
Multi-Agent Workflow: Startup MVP
> A step-by-step example of how to coordinate multiple agents to go from idea to shipped MVP.
The Scenario
You're building a SaaS MVP — a team retrospective tool for remote teams. You have 4 weeks to ship a working product with user signups, a core feature, and a landing page.
Agent Team
| Agent | Role in this workflow | |-------|---------------------| | Sprint Prioritizer | Break the project into weekly sprints | | UX Researcher | Validate the idea with quick user interviews | | Backend Architect | Design the API and data model | | Frontend Developer | Build the React app | | Rapid Prototyper | Get the first version running fast | | Growth Hacker | Plan launch strategy while building | | Reality Checker | Gate each milestone before moving on |
The Workflow
Week 1: Discovery + Architecture
**Step 1 — Activate Sprint Prioritizer**
Activate Sprint Prioritizer. Project: RetroBoard — a real-time team retrospective tool for remote teams. Timeline: 4 weeks to MVP launch. Core features: user auth, create retro boards, add cards, vote, action items. Constraints: solo developer, React + Node.js stack, deploy to Vercel + Railway. Break this into 4 weekly sprints with clear deliverables and acceptance criteria.
**Step 2 — Activate UX Researcher (in parallel)**
Activate UX Researcher. I'm building a team retrospective tool for remote teams (5-20 people). Competitors: EasyRetro, Retrium, Parabol. Run a quick competitive analysis and identify: 1. What features are table stakes 2. Where competitors fall short 3. One differentiator we could own Output a 1-page research brief.
**Step 3 — Hand off to Backend Architect**
Activate Backend Architect. Here's our sprint plan: [paste Sprint Prioritizer output] Here's our research brief: [paste UX Researcher output] Design the API and database schema for RetroBoard. Stack: Node.js, Express, PostgreSQL, Socket.io for real-time. Deliver: 1. Database schema (SQL) 2. REST API endpoints list 3. WebSocket events for real-time board updates 4. Auth strategy recommendation
Week 2: Build Core Features
**Step 4 — Activate Frontend Developer + Rapid Prototyper**
Activate Frontend Developer. Here's the API spec: [paste Backend Architect output] Build the RetroBoard React app: - Stack: React, TypeScript, Tailwind, Socket.io-client - Pages: Login, Dashboard, Board view - Components: RetroCard, VoteButton, ActionItem, BoardColumn Start with the Board view — it's the core experience. Focus on real-time: when one user adds a card, everyone sees it.
**Step 5 — Reality Check at midpoint**
Activate Reality Checker. We're at week 2 of a 4-week MVP build for RetroBoard. Here's what we have so far: - Database schema: [paste] - API endpoints: [paste] - Frontend components: [paste] Evaluate: 1. Can we realistically ship in 2 more weeks? 2. What should we cut to make the deadline? 3. Any technical debt that will bite us at launch?
Week 3: Polish + Landing Page
**Step 6 — Frontend Developer continues, Growth Hacker starts**
Activate Growth Hacker. Product: RetroBoard — team retrospective tool, launching in 1 week. Target: Engineering managers and scrum masters at remote-first companies. Budget: $0 (organic launch only). Create a launch plan: 1. Landing page copy (hero, features, CTA) 2. Launch channels (Product Hunt, Reddit, Hacker News, Twitter) 3. Day-by-day launch sequence 4. Metrics to track in week 1
Week 4: Launch
**Step 7 — Final Reality Check**
Activate Reality Checker. RetroBoard is ready to launch. Evaluate production readiness: - Live URL: [url] - Test accounts created: yes - Error monitoring: Sentry configured - Database backups: daily automated Run through the launch checklist and give a GO / NO-GO decision. Require evidence for each criterion.
Key Patterns
1. **Sequential handoffs**: Each agent's output becomes the next agent's input 2. **Parallel work**: UX Researcher and Sprint Prioritizer can run simultaneously in Week 1 3. **Quality gates**: Reality Checker at midpoint and before launch prevents shipping broken code 4. **Context passing**: Always paste previous agent outputs into the next prompt — agents don't share memory
Tips
- Copy-paste agent outputs between steps — don't summarize, use the full output
- If a Reality Checker flags an issue, loop back to the relevant specialist to fix it
- Keep the Orchestrator agent in mind for automating this flow once you're comfortable with the manual version
Portable AI agent orchestration with mechanical protocol enforcement. 186 agents, zero runtime dependencies.
Other agents on harmonist.
- SCHEMA
Single source of truth for the shape of every agent in this pack. One schema, one pool — `agents/index.json` is generated from these files, and the orchestrator routes tasks to agents via that index. **See also**: `agents/STYLE.md` — how the body of an agent should *read*
Open agent - STYLE
How to write an agent body that is useful, compact, and consistent with the rest of the pack. Follow this when adding a new agent or materially rewriting an existing one. This is a *companion* to `SCHEMA.md`. SCHEMA defines the **shape** every file must conform to (frontmatter,
Open agent - TAGS
Curated list of every tag an agent is allowed to declare. Source of truth: [`tags.json`](tags.json). Linter rejects any tag not in this list.
Open agent - academic-anthropologist
Expert in cultural systems, rituals, kinship, belief systems, and ethnographic method — builds culturally coherent societies that feel lived-in rather than invented
Open agent - academic-geographer
Expert in physical and human geography, climate systems, cartography, and spatial analysis — builds geographically coherent worlds where terrain, climate, resources, and settlement patterns make scientific sense
Open agent - academic-historian
Expert in historical analysis, periodization, material culture, and historiography — validates historical coherence and enriches settings with authentic period detail grounded in primary and secondary sources
Open agent

