Skip to content
Agent Orchestration
Skill

/clarify

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.

BOOST
From plugin
ccg
5.9k47 skills19 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add fengshao1227/ccg-workflow --skill clarify --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/clarify

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.

SKILL.md

clarify.SKILL.md
name: clarify
description: "Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing."
argument-hint: "[target]"
user-invocable: false

Identify and improve unclear, confusing, or poorly written interface text to make the product easier to understand and use.

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /frontend-design — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: audience technical level and users' mental state in context.

---

Assess Current Copy

Identify what makes the text unclear or ineffective:

1. **Find clarity problems**:

  • **Jargon**: Technical terms users won't understand
  • **Ambiguity**: Multiple interpretations possible
  • **Passive voice**: "Your file has been uploaded" vs "We uploaded your file"
  • **Length**: Too wordy or too terse
  • **Assumptions**: Assuming user knowledge they don't have
  • **Missing context**: Users don't know what to do or why
  • **Tone mismatch**: Too formal, too casual, or inappropriate for situation

2. **Understand the context**:

  • Who's the audience? (Technical? General? First-time users?)
  • What's the user's mental state? (Stressed during error? Confident during success?)
  • What's the action? (What do we want users to do?)
  • What's the constraint? (Character limits? Space limitations?)

**CRITICAL**: Clear copy helps users succeed. Unclear copy creates frustration, errors, and support tickets.

Plan Copy Improvements

Create a strategy for clearer communication:

  • **Primary message**: What's the ONE thing users need to know?
  • **Action needed**: What should users do next (if anything)?
  • **Tone**: How should this feel? (Helpful? Apologetic? Encouraging?)
  • **Constraints**: Length limits, brand voice, localization considerations

**IMPORTANT**: Good UX writing is invisible. Users should understand immediately without noticing the words.

Improve Copy Systematically

Refine text across these common areas:

Error Messages

**Bad**: "Error 403: Forbidden" **Good**: "You don't have permission to view this page. Contact your admin for access."

**Bad**: "Invalid input" **Good**: "Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: name@example.com"

**Principles**:

  • Explain what went wrong in plain language
  • Suggest how to fix it
  • Don't blame the user
  • Include examples when helpful
  • Link to help/support if applicable

Form Labels & Instructions

**Bad**: "DOB (MM/DD/YYYY)" **Good**: "Date of birth" (with placeholder showing format)

**Bad**: "Enter value here" **Good**: "Your email address" or "Company name"

**Principles**:

  • Use clear, specific labels (not generic placeholders)
  • Show format expectations with examples
  • Explain why you're asking (when not obvious)
  • Put instructions before the field, not after
  • Keep required field indicators clear

Button & CTA Text

**Bad**: "Click here" | "Submit" | "OK" **Good**: "Create account" | "Save changes" | "Got it, thanks"

**Principles**:

  • Describe the action specifically
  • Use active voice (verb + noun)
  • Match user's mental model
  • Be specific ("Save" is better than "OK")

Help Text & Tooltips

**Bad**: "This is the username field" **Good**: "Choose a username. You can change this later in Settings."

**Principles**:

  • Add value (don't just repeat the label)
  • Answer the implicit question ("What is this?" or "Why do you need this?")
  • Keep it brief but complete
  • Link to detailed docs if needed

Empty States

**Bad**: "No items" **Good**: "No projects yet. Create your first project to get started."

**Principles**:

  • Explain why it's empty (if not obvious)
  • Show next action clearly
  • Make it welcoming, not dead-end

Success Messages

**Bad**: "Success" **Good**: "Settings saved! Your changes will take effect immediately."

**Principles**:

  • Confirm what happened
  • Explain what happens next (if relevant)
  • Be brief but complete
  • Match the user's emotional moment (celebrate big wins)

Loading States

**Bad**: "Loading..." (for 30+ seconds) **Good**: "Analyzing your data... this usually takes 30-60 seconds"

**Principles**:

  • Set expectations (how long?)
  • Explain what's happening (when it's not obvious)
  • Show progress when possible
  • Offer escape hatch if appropriate ("Cancel")

Confirmation Dialogs

**Bad**: "Are you sure?" **Good**: "Delete 'Project Alpha'? This can't be undone."

**Principles**:

  • State the specific action
  • Explain consequences (especially for destructive actions)
  • Use clear button labels ("Delete project" not "Yes")
  • Don't overuse confirmations (only for risky actions)

Navigation & Wayfinding

**Bad**: Generic labels like "Items" | "Things" | "Stuff" **Good**: Specific labels like "Your projects" | "Team members" | "Settings"

**Principles**:

  • Be specific and descriptive
  • Use language users understand (not internal jargon)
  • Make hierarchy clear
  • Consider information scent (breadcrumbs, current location)

Apply Clarity Principles

Every piece of copy should follow these rules:

1. **Be specific**: "Enter email" not "Enter value" 2. **Be concise**: Cut unnecessary words (but don't sacrifice clarity) 3. **Be active**: "Save changes" not "Changes will be saved" 4. **Be human**: "Oops, something went wrong" not "System error encountered" 5. **Be helpful**: Tell users what to do, not just what happened 6. **Be consistent**: Use same terms throughout (don't vary for variety)

**NEVER**:

  • Use jargon without explanation
  • Blame users ("You made an error" → "This field is required")
  • Be vague ("Something went wrong" without explanation)
  • Use passive voice unnecessarily
  • Write overly long explanations (be concise)
  • Use humor for errors (be empathetic
Read more
Ships withccg

多模型协作工作流引擎 — /ccg:go 一个命令,AI 自动分析意图、选择策略、编排 Codex + Gemini + Claude 协作执行

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on ccg.

verify-change
Skill

verify-change

变更校验关卡。分析代码变更,检测文档同步状态,评估变更影响范围。当用户提到变更检查、文档同步、代码审查、提交前检查、diff分析时使用。在设计级变更、重构完成时自动触发。

verify-module
Skill

verify-module

模块完整性校验关卡。扫描目录结构、检测缺失文档、验证代码与文档同步。当用户提到模块校验、文档检查、结构完整性、README检查、DESIGN检查时使用。在新建模块完成时自动触发。

verify-quality
Skill

verify-quality

代码质量校验关卡。检测复杂度、重复代码、命名规范、函数长度等质量指标。当用户提到代码质量、复杂度检查、代码异味、重构建议、lint检查、代码规范时使用。在复杂模块、重构完成时自动触发。

verify-security
Skill

verify-security

安全校验关卡。自动扫描代码安全漏洞,检测危险模式,确保安全决策有文档记录。当用户提到安全扫描、漏洞检测、安全审计、代码安全、OWASP、注入检测、敏感信息泄露时使用。在新建模块、安全相关变…