/pm-metrics-review
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended
$ npx -y skills add evolution-foundation/evo-nexus --skill pm-metrics-review --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/pm-metrics-review
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended
SKILL.md
pm-metrics-review.SKILL.mdname: pm-metrics-review
description: Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
argument-hint: "<time period or metric focus>"
Metrics Review
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
Usage
/pm-metrics-review $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
1. Gather Metrics Data
Pull data from connected sources before asking the user:
**Stripe** (`int-stripe`):
- MRR, ARR, new revenue, churn, expansion revenue
- Subscription changes, plan mix, trial conversions
**Licensing** (`int-licensing`):
- Active instances, version distribution, geographic spread
- Growth trends for open source usage
**Evo CRM** (`int-evo-crm`):
- Active agents, pipeline metrics, user activity
- Activation and engagement signals
If no tool data is available, ask the user to provide:
- The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
- Comparison data (previous period, targets)
- Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)
Ask the user:
- What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
- What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
- Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
- Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?
2. Organize the Metrics
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See **Product Metrics Hierarchy** below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
3. Analyze Trends
For each key metric:
- **Current value**: What is the metric today?
- **Trend**: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
- **vs Target**: How does it compare to the goal or target?
- **Rate of change**: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
- **Anomalies**: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?
Identify correlations:
- Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
- Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
- Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?
4. Generate the Review
Summary
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Metric Scorecard
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status | |--------|---------|----------|--------|--------|--------| | [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
Trend Analysis
For each metric worth discussing:
- What happened and how significant is the change
- Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
- Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend
Bright Spots
What is going well:
- Metrics beating targets
- Positive trends to sustain
- Segments or features showing strong performance
Areas of Concern
What needs attention:
- Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
- Early warning signals before they become problems
- Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding
Recommended Actions
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
- Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
- Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
- Investments to make (double down on what is working)
- Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)
Context and Caveats
- Known data quality issues
- Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
- Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet
5. Follow Up
After generating the review:
- Ask if any metric needs deeper investigation
- Offer to create a dashboard spec for ongoing monitoring
- Offer to draft experiment proposals for areas of concern
- Offer to set up a metrics review template for recurring use
Product Metrics Hierarchy
North Star Metric
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
- **Value-aligned**: Moves when users get more value from the product
- **Leading**: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
- **Actionable**: The product team can influence it through their work
- **Understandable**: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters
**Examples by product type**:
- Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
- Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
- SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
- Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
- Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool
L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
**Acquisition**: Are new users finding the product?
- New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
- Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
- Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
- Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)
**Activation**: Are new users reaching the value moment?
- Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
- Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
- Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
- First value moment: when users first experience the core product value
**Engagement**: Are active users getting value?
- DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
- DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users c
Read more
name: pm-metrics-review description: Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions. argument-hint: "<time period or metric focus>"
Metrics Review
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
Usage
/pm-metrics-review $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
1. Gather Metrics Data
Pull data from connected sources before asking the user:
**Stripe** (`int-stripe`):
- MRR, ARR, new revenue, churn, expansion revenue
- Subscription changes, plan mix, trial conversions
**Licensing** (`int-licensing`):
- Active instances, version distribution, geographic spread
- Growth trends for open source usage
**Evo CRM** (`int-evo-crm`):
- Active agents, pipeline metrics, user activity
- Activation and engagement signals
If no tool data is available, ask the user to provide:
- The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
- Comparison data (previous period, targets)
- Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)
Ask the user:
- What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
- What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
- Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
- Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?
2. Organize the Metrics
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See **Product Metrics Hierarchy** below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
3. Analyze Trends
For each key metric:
- **Current value**: What is the metric today?
- **Trend**: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
- **vs Target**: How does it compare to the goal or target?
- **Rate of change**: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
- **Anomalies**: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?
Identify correlations:
- Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
- Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
- Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?
4. Generate the Review
Summary
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Metric Scorecard
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status | |--------|---------|----------|--------|--------|--------| | [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
Trend Analysis
For each metric worth discussing:
- What happened and how significant is the change
- Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
- Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend
Bright Spots
What is going well:
- Metrics beating targets
- Positive trends to sustain
- Segments or features showing strong performance
Areas of Concern
What needs attention:
- Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
- Early warning signals before they become problems
- Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding
Recommended Actions
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
- Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
- Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
- Investments to make (double down on what is working)
- Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)
Context and Caveats
- Known data quality issues
- Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
- Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet
5. Follow Up
After generating the review:
- Ask if any metric needs deeper investigation
- Offer to create a dashboard spec for ongoing monitoring
- Offer to draft experiment proposals for areas of concern
- Offer to set up a metrics review template for recurring use
Product Metrics Hierarchy
North Star Metric
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
- **Value-aligned**: Moves when users get more value from the product
- **Leading**: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
- **Actionable**: The product team can influence it through their work
- **Understandable**: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters
**Examples by product type**:
- Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
- Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
- SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
- Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
- Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool
L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
**Acquisition**: Are new users finding the product?
- New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
- Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
- Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
- Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)
**Activation**: Are new users reaching the value moment?
- Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
- Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
- Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
- First value moment: when users first experience the core product value
**Engagement**: Are active users getting value?
- DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
- DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users c
Other skills on evo-nexus.
- /ai-image-creator
Generate PNG images using AI (multiple models via OpenRouter including Gemini, FLUX.2, Riverflow, SeedDream, GPT-5 Image, proxied through Cloudflare AI Gateway BYOK). Also analyze/describe existing images using multimodal AI vision. Use when user asks to "generate an image",
Open skill - /create-agent
Create a new custom agent for the workspace. Guides the user through defining agent name, domain, personality, skills, model, and memory folder. Use when the user says 'create an agent', 'new agent', 'add an agent', 'I need a custom agent', or wants to create a specialized agent
Open skill - /create-command
Create a new slash command for Claude Code. Guides the user through defining the command name, what it does, and generates the markdown file in .claude/commands/. Use when the user says 'create a command', 'new command', 'add a slash command', 'I want a shortcut for', or wants
Open skill - /create-goal
Create a Mission, Project, or Goal (Mission → Project → Goal → Task hierarchy) in EvoNexus. Guides the user through picking a mission, choosing or creating a project, defining a measurable goal with metric_type and target_value. Writes to the SQLite goals tables via POST
Open skill - /create-heartbeat
Create a new heartbeat (proactive agent scheduled with a decision prompt) for EvoNexus. Guides the user through picking an agent, setting interval, wake triggers, and the decision prompt that governs when the agent acts. Writes to config/heartbeats.yaml with pydantic validation.
Open skill - /create-integration
Create a new custom integration (API/service wrapper) for the workspace. Guides the user through defining the integration's slug, display name, description, category, and required env keys. Writes .claude/skills/custom-int-{slug}/SKILL.md via POST /api/integrations/custom. Use
Open skill

