/mkt-brand-review

name: mkt-brand-review
description: Review content against your brand voice, style guide, and messaging pillars, flagging deviations by severity with specific before/after fixes. Use when checking a draft before it ships, when auditing copy for voice consistency and terminology, or when screening for unsubstantiated claims, missing disclaimers, and other legal flags.
argument-hint: "<content to review>"

Brand Review

> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).

Review marketing content against brand voice, style guidelines, and messaging standards. Flag deviations and provide specific improvement suggestions.

Trigger

User runs `/brand-review` or asks to review, check, or audit content against brand guidelines.

Inputs

1. **Content to review** — accept content in any of these forms:

• Pasted directly into the conversation
• A file path or ~~knowledge base reference (e.g. Notion page, shared doc)
• A URL to a published page
• Multiple pieces for batch review

2. **Brand guidelines source** (determined automatically):

• If a brand style guide is configured in local settings, use it automatically
• If not configured, ask: "Do you have a brand style guide or voice guidelines I should review against? You can paste them, share a file, or describe your brand voice. Otherwise, I'll do a general review for clarity, consistency, and professionalism."

Review Process

With Brand Guidelines Configured

Evaluate the content against each of these dimensions:

Voice and Tone

• Does the content match the defined brand voice attributes?
• Is the tone appropriate for the content type and audience?
• Are there shifts in voice that feel inconsistent?
• Flag specific sentences or phrases that deviate with an explanation of why

Terminology and Language

• Are preferred brand terms used correctly?
• Are any "avoid" terms or phrases present?
• Is jargon level appropriate for the target audience?
• Are product names, feature names, and branded terms used correctly (capitalization, formatting)?

Messaging Pillars

• Does the content align with defined messaging pillars or value propositions?
• Are claims consistent with approved messaging?
• Is the content reinforcing or contradicting brand positioning?

Style Guide Compliance

• Grammar and punctuation per style guide (e.g., Oxford comma, title case vs. sentence case)
• Formatting conventions (headers, lists, emphasis)
• Number formatting, date formatting
• Acronym usage (defined on first use?)

Without Brand Guidelines (Generic Review)

Evaluate the content for:

Clarity

• Is the main message clear within the first paragraph?
• Are sentences concise and easy to understand?
• Is the structure logical and easy to follow?
• Are there ambiguous statements or unclear references?

Consistency

• Is the tone consistent throughout?
• Are terms used consistently (no switching between synonyms for the same concept)?
• Is formatting consistent (headers, lists, capitalization)?

Professionalism

• Is the content free of typos, grammatical errors, and awkward phrasing?
• Is the tone appropriate for the intended audience?
• Are claims supported or substantiated?

Legal and Compliance Flags (Always Checked)

Regardless of whether brand guidelines are configured, flag:

• **Unsubstantiated claims** — superlatives ("best", "fastest", "only") without evidence or qualification
• **Missing disclaimers** — financial claims, health claims, or guarantees that may need legal disclaimers
• **Comparative claims** — comparisons to competitors that could be challenged
• **Regulatory language** — content that may need compliance review (financial services, healthcare, etc.)
• **Testimonial issues** — quotes or endorsements without attribution or disclosure
• **Copyright concerns** — content that appears to be closely paraphrased from other sources

Brand Voice Reference

Use these frameworks to evaluate content against brand standards or to help the user document their brand voice.

Brand Voice Documentation Framework

A complete brand voice document should cover these areas:

1. **Brand Personality** — Define the brand as if it were a person. Example: "If our brand were a person, they would be a knowledgeable colleague who explains complex things simply, celebrates your wins genuinely, and never talks down to you." 2. **Voice Attributes** — 3-5 attributes that define how the brand communicates, each defined with what it means in practice, what it does NOT mean (to prevent misinterpretation), and an example. 3. **Audience Awareness** — Who the brand is speaking to (primary and secondary), what they care about, their level of expertise, and how they expect to be addressed. 4. **Core Messaging Pillars** — 3-5 key themes the brand consistently communicates, the hierarchy of these messages, and how each pillar connects to audience needs. 5. **Tone Spectrum** — How the voice adapts across contexts while remaining recognizably the same brand. 6. **Style Rules** — Specific grammar, formatting, and language rules. 7. **Terminology** — Preferred and avoided terms.

Voice Attribute Spectrums

When defining or evaluating brand voice, position attributes on a spectrum:

| Spectrum | One End | Other End | |----------|---------|-----------| | Formality | Formal, institutional | Casual, conversational | | Authority | Expert, authoritative | Peer-level, collaborative | | Emotion | Warm, empathetic | Direct, matter-of-fact | | Complexity | Technical, precise | Simple, accessible | | Energy | Bold, energetic | Calm, measured | | Humor | Playful, witty | Serious, earnest | | Innovation | Cutting-edge, forward-looking | Established, proven |

For each chosen attribute, document it in this format:

**[Attribute name]**

• **We are**: [what this means in practice]
• **We are not**: [common misinterpretation to avoid]
• **This sounds like**: [e