Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/dev-verify

Verify that a change really works before claiming completion. Use when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works — turns vague "it should work" claims into concrete evidence. Pairs with @oath-verifier agent.

From plugin
evo-nexus
520193 skills38 agents40 commands9 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add evolution-foundation/evo-nexus --skill dev-verify --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/dev-verify

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Verify that a change really works before claiming completion. Use when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works — turns vague "it should work" claims into concrete evidence. Pairs with @oath-verifier agent.

SKILL.md

dev-verify.SKILL.md
name: dev-verify
description: Verify that a change really works before claiming completion. Use when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works — turns vague "it should work" claims into concrete evidence. Pairs with @oath-verifier agent.

Dev Verify

Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer.

Use this skill when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works.

Goal

Turn vague "it should work" claims into concrete evidence.

Workflow

1. Identify the exact behavior that must be proven. 2. Prefer existing tests first. 3. If coverage is missing, run the narrowest direct verification commands available. 4. If direct automation is not enough, describe the manual validation steps and gather concrete observable evidence. 5. Report only what was actually verified.

Verification order

1. Existing tests 2. Typecheck / build 3. Narrow direct command checks 4. Manual or interactive validation

Rules

  • Do not say a change is complete without evidence.
  • If a check fails, include the failure clearly.
  • If no realistic verification path exists, say that explicitly instead of bluffing.
  • Prefer concise evidence summaries over noisy logs.

Output

  • What was verified
  • Which commands/tests were run
  • What passed
  • What failed or remains unverified

When to delegate

For deeper verification with formal acceptance criteria mapping, delegate to `@oath-verifier`.

Read more
Ships withevo-nexus

The open source operating system for AI-powered businesses

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on evo-nexus.