align-grid
Build editorial/magazine/report webpages on a GENUINE Müller-Brockmann modular grid (International Typographic Style) — not a…
Streamlined fast-path for trivial data-only fixes — no TDD, no branching ceremony. Collapses 6 skills into 2 for changes that are purely data with no logic risk. Aborts with fallback to investigate-bug if guardrails trigger.
$ npx -y skills add danielvm-git/bigpowers --skill quick-fix --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/quick-fixContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Streamlined fast-path for trivial data-only fixes — no TDD, no branching ceremony. Collapses 6 skills into 2 for changes that are purely data with no logic risk. Aborts with fallback to investigate-bug if guardrails trigger.
# story: e51s04 name: quick-fix description: "Streamlined fast-path for trivial data-only fixes — no TDD, no branching ceremony. Collapses 6 skills into 2 for changes that are purely data with no logic risk. Aborts with fallback to investigate-bug if guardrails trigger." model: sonnet effort: standard
> **HARD GATE** — ALL entry criteria must pass before invoking quick-fix. If any guardrail triggers during execution, abort immediately and fall back to `investigate-bug`. Do NOT use quick-fix for logic changes, multi-file edits, or diffs > 5 lines.
Fast-track for trivial data-only fixes that do not require the full bug-fix chain.
When a bug fix is purely data — an add-missing-key, a typo correction, a config value update — the standard 6-skill chain (investigate-bug → diagnose-root → develop-tdd → kickoff-branch → verify-work → release-branch) is wasteful overhead. Quick-fix collapses it to 2 skills: **quick-fix** then **release-branch**.
A **Preflight**, **golden suite**, or **baseline red** failure discovered during unrelated work is valid quick-fix entry when the root cause is a data-only gap (missing key, typo, stale config) — **no user-reported bug required**. If guardrails abort (logic change, >1 file, >5 lines), fall back to `fix-bug` instead of narrating and continuing.
Before invoking quick-fix, evaluate every item in this checklist:
1. **Purely data change** — adding a missing key, fixing a typo, updating a config value, correcting a constant 2. **No logic change** — no function signature, condition, loop, or control flow is modified 3. **No refactor risk** — the change does not reorganize or rename existing structures 4. **No API surface change** — no exported symbol, interface, or contract changes 5. **Verifiable with a single assertion** — one test, one curl, one grep can prove it works 6. **Affects ≤ 1 file** 7. **Affects ≤ 5 lines changed**
If ANY guardrail triggers, **abort immediately** and suggest `investigate-bug` instead:
| Guardrail | Check | |-----------|-------| | **>1 file** | The fix touches more than one file | | **>5 lines** | The diff exceeds 5 lines | | **Logic change** | Any function signature, condition, or loop is modified | | **Complex verify** | The verify command is more than one pipeline | | **Test breakage** | Running `npm test` or equivalent breaks any existing test |
> **Fallback:** If any guardrail triggers, tell the user: *"This fix exceeds quick-fix guardrails. Use `investigate-bug` for the full TDD bug-fix chain instead."*
Only 2 skills needed for eligible fixes:
quick-fix → apply change, run one-line verify, commit with fix: release-branch → merge and ship (existing skill)
**Skipped skills (with justification):**
| Skipped skill | Why skipped | |---------------|-------------| | `investigate-bug` | Root cause is obvious (data gap, not logic error) | | `diagnose-root` | No isolation needed — the data point is the root cause | | `develop-tdd` | No logic to test — single assertion proves correctness | | `kickoff-branch` | Change is so small it does not warrant a separate worktree |
> Justification is included in the `fix:` commit body so the audit trail is preserved.
Run the entry criteria checklist above. If any criterion fails → abort, suggest `investigate-bug`.
Make the data change — add the missing key, fix the typo, update the value. Keep it to ≤5 lines in 1 file.
Run the single-assertion verify command. Example:
grep -q "Bosnia" src/flags.js && echo "FIX VERIFIED" || echo "FIX FAILED"
git add <file> git commit -m "fix(<scope>): <description>" git commit --amend -m "fix(<scope>): <description> Skipped skills (justified for data-only change): - investigate-bug: root cause is a data gap, not a logic error - diagnose-root: the missing data point is the root cause - develop-tdd: single assertion proves correctness - kickoff-branch: change is too small for a separate worktree"
Invoke `release-branch` to merge and ship.
Given a bug where FLAGS dictionary is missing entry "Bosnia" And no logic depends on the missing entry (purely a data gap) When the agent invokes quick-fix Then the missing entry is added to the dictionary And a one-line verify confirms the key exists: grep -q "Bosnia" src/flags.js And a fix: commit is created with the skipped-skills rationale in the body And the change is ready for release-branch
Agent skills synthesizing 17 years of software engineering discipline — from Clean Code to AI-native architecture — into a single, prescriptive methodology for solo developers.
Build editorial/magazine/report webpages on a GENUINE Müller-Brockmann modular grid (International Typographic Style) — not a…
Analyze the blast radius of a proposed change before any code is written. Maps dependents, affected stories, and test coverage.…
Self-review checklist for the coding agent to run before dispatching a reviewer. Checks CONVENTIONS.md compliance, Boy Scout…
Evaluate an incoming project plan against bigpowers principles and conventions, surface gaps, and produce a READY/NOT READY…
Eight-step epic build cycle — reads state.yaml, execution-status.yaml, and one epic capsule; updates status via bp-yaml-set or…
Add a new requirement or reorder epics by WSJF against specs/release-plan.yaml and epic capsule directories. Modes Add and…