n8n-agents
Design n8n AI agents the right way. Use when building or editing any @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.* AI node — an AI Agent, LLM chain,…
Wire n8n error handling so failures are loud, structured, and recoverable. Use when building any webhook/API workflow, a scheduled or unattended workflow, or any path where a silent failure would drop user-visible work — and whenever the user mentions error handling, onError,
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-error-handling -a windsurf -y
name: n8n-error-handling description: Wire n8n error handling so failures are loud, structured, and recoverable. Use when building any webhook/API workflow, a scheduled or unattended workflow, or any path where a silent failure would drop user-visible work — and whenever the user mentions error handling, onError, continueErrorOutput, error branches/outputs, retries, retryOnFail, Respond to Webhook status codes, 4xx/5xx, Error Trigger, or "my workflow fails silently". Covers per-node error outputs and wiring, retry/self-healing, error-trigger workflows, and 4xx/5xx response shapes.
By default, when an n8n node throws, the **whole workflow halts**. For an interactive run you're watching, that's fine — you see the red node and fix it. For anything unattended (a webhook API, a cron job, a queue worker, an agent tool), it's the wrong default: the caller gets a timeout or an empty 500, the operator gets no alert, and the symptom is "the integration just stopped working" with no log and no clue.
This skill is about making failures **loud, structured, and recoverable** — and, best case, **self-healing** so transient blips never reach a human at all.
The two ideas that prevent most silent failures:
---
| Workflow shape | Error handling posture | |---|---| | Webhook / API (anything with `Respond to Webhook`) | **Required.** Every fallible node's error output wired; status code matches cause. | | Scheduled / cron / queue worker / agent tool (unattended) | **Required.** A workflow-level error workflow, plus `retryOnFail` on network nodes. | | Internal one-off you run and watch yourself | **Optional.** Default `onError: "stopWorkflow"` is fine — you'll see the red node and re-run. |
The dividing line: **if anyone other than you sees the output** — a downstream system, an end user, an on-call engineer — the failure has to be handled, not swallowed. If you're the only watcher and the cost of failure is "I notice and re-run", looser is fine.
---
This is the single most common way an n8n workflow "handles" errors while actually swallowing them. Routing a node's failure to a handler takes **two** changes, and doing only one looks complete but misbehaves:
1. **Set `onError: "continueErrorOutput"`** on the node. This is what *creates* the second output. Without it, `main[1]` doesn't exist no matter what you wire. 2. **Wire that error output** (`connections.<node>.main[1]`, i.e. `sourceIndex: 1`) to a real handler. Without a target, the error data is emitted into the void.
Get one without the other and you hit a failure mode:
| What you did | What happens at runtime | |---|---| | `onError` set, error output **not** wired | Error data is silently discarded. Downstream doesn't fire. The dashboard shows the run as **succeeded**. Worst case — no error logged anywhere. | | Error output wired, `onError` **not** set | The slot never fires; the handler is unreachable. On failure the workflow just **halts** (default `stopWorkflow`). | | Both done | Failure routes down `main[1]` to your handler. ✅ |
// 1) Turn on the error output (creates main[1])
{ type: "updateNode", nodeName: "HTTP Request",
changes: { onError: "continueErrorOutput" } }
// 2) Wire the error output to a handler. sourceIndex: 1 = the error output.
{ type: "addConnection",
source: "HTTP Request",
target: "Handle Error",
sourceIndex: 1 }`sourceIndex: 0` is the success path, `sourceIndex: 1` is the error path. (For IF nodes the aliases `branch: "true"`/`"false"` map to index 0/1; for a generic fallible node, use the explicit `sourceIndex: 1`.)
**Then verify.** This trap doesn't surface in `validate_workflow` — a half-wired error output validates clean. Pull the workflow with `n8n_get_workflow` and confirm **both** halves:
Valid `onError` values:
| Value | Effect | |---|---| | `"stopWorkflow"` (default) | Error halts the whole workflow. | | `"continueRegularOutput"` | Error item flows out the **normal** output. Rare, usually wrong — downstream gets error-shaped data and keeps going. | | `"continueErrorOutput"` | Error item flows out the **separate** error output (`main[1]`). The one you wire. |
Full failure-mode catalog, fan-in/fan-out shapes, and verification: **NODE_ERROR_OUTPUTS.md**.
A correctly wired error output still misses whole classes of failure. Verified on n8n 2.38.5:
| Failure | With `continueErrorOutput` | With `continueRegularOutput` | |---|---|---| | JS error **inside `{{ }}`** (TypeError on a missing path, `JSON.parse` on bad input, a thrown `Error`, a JMESPath syntax error) | nothing fires; the field is `null` and items take the **success** path | same | | Python Code node **rejected before running** (blocked import, dunder access: `Security violations detected`) or **bad return shape** (list in each-item mode) | node marked failed, but the **unchanged input items leave through the success output**; `main[1]` stays empty and the execution shows success | unchanged input items pass through | | Exception **while** code runs (`raise`/`throw`, `KeyError`, `NameError`) | routed to `main[1]` as `{ error }` ✅ | `{ error }` item on the main output |
So an error branch alone can't guard these:
field you produced exists (IF/Filter on `{{ $json.total !== undefined && $json.total !== null }}`) and se
Expert Claude Code skills for building flawless n8n workflows using the n8n-mcp MCP server
Design n8n AI agents the right way. Use when building or editing any @n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.* AI node — an AI Agent, LLM chain,…
Handle files and binary data in n8n correctly. Use when working with files, images, PDFs, attachments, uploads or downloads,…
Write, review, or debug JavaScript in an n8n Code node. Use when a Code node is already in the workflow (editing it, fixing an…
Write Python in n8n Code nodes (native Python, `language` pythonNative, n8n 2.x). Use when the user explicitly wants Python in a…
Write JavaScript or Python for the n8n Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode) — the AI-agent-callable tool, NOT the…
Validate n8n expression syntax and fix common errors. Use when writing n8n expressions, using {{}} syntax, accessing $json/$node…
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…