/kb-report-generation

name: kb-report-generation
description: Reference data, not a reviewer. Format accessibility audit reports with severity scoring (0-100, A-F grades), scorecard computation, and compliance exports including VPAT/ACR and remediation priorities.
license: MIT
disable-model-invocation: true
user-invocable: false
metadata:
  tier: reference
  domain: cross-cutting
  output: none
  effort: low
  title: Report Generation

Report Generation

Report File

Default output: `DOCUMENT-ACCESSIBILITY-AUDIT.md` in the project root.

Required Sections

Every audit report MUST include these sections:

1. **Audit Information** - date, auditor, profile, scope, counts 2. **Executive Summary** - totals, pass rate, most common issue, effort estimate 3. **Cross-Document Patterns** - recurring issues, systemic failures 4. **Findings by File** - per-document issues with rule ID, severity, location, WCAG, impact, remediation 5. **Findings by Rule (Cross-Reference)** - rule-level aggregation across files 6. **What Passed** - acknowledge clean documents and categories 7. **Remediation Priority** - ordered by impact (Immediate / Soon / When Possible) 8. **Accessibility Scorecard** - per-document scores and grades 9. **Metadata Dashboard** - document properties health 10. **Confidence Summary** - breakdown by confidence level

Optional Sections (include when applicable)

• **Template Analysis** - when batch scanning detects shared templates
• **Comparison Report** - when re-scanning against a baseline
• **CI/CD Recommendations** - when no config files exist

Severity Scoring Formula

Document Score = 100 - (sum of weighted findings)

Weights:
  Error (high confidence):   -10 points
  Error (medium confidence):  -7 points
  Error (low confidence):     -3 points
  Warning (high confidence):  -3 points
  Warning (medium confidence):-2 points
  Warning (low confidence):   -1 point
  Tips:                        0 points

Floor: 0 (minimum score)

Score Grades

Each score, with its grade and meaning.

| Score | Grade | Meaning | |-------|-------|---------| | 90-100 | A | Excellent - minor or no issues | | 75-89 | B | Good - some warnings, few errors | | 50-74 | C | Needs Work - multiple errors | | 25-49 | D | Poor - significant accessibility barriers | | 0-24 | F | Failing - critical barriers, likely unusable with AT |

Organization Modes

Each mode, with description and best for.

| Mode | Description | Best For | |------|-------------|----------| | By file | Group all issues under each document | Small batches (< 10 files) | | By issue type | Group all instances of each rule across documents | Seeing patterns | | By severity | Critical first, then serious, moderate, minor | Prioritizing fixes |

VPAT/ACR Compliance Export

Conformance Levels

Each level, with its criteria.

| Level | Criteria | |-------|----------| | Supports | No findings for this WCAG criterion across any document | | Partially Supports | Some documents pass, some fail | | Does Not Support | All or most documents fail | | Not Applicable | Criterion does not apply to scanned document types |

Supported VPAT Editions

• **VPAT 2.5 (WCAG)** - maps to WCAG 2.2 criteria
• **VPAT 2.5 (508)** - maps to Revised Section 508 standards
• **VPAT 2.5 (EN 301 549)** - maps to EU accessibility directive
• **VPAT 2.5 (INT)** - International edition (all three combined)

Remediation Tracking

When comparing against a baseline audit report:

| Status | Meaning | |--------|---------| | Fixed | Issue was in previous report but is now resolved | | New | Issue was not in previous report but appears now | | Persistent | Issue remains from previous report | | Regressed | Issue was previously fixed but has returned |

Progress Metrics

• Issue reduction percentage: `(fixed / previous_total) * 100`
• Score change: `current_score - previous_score`
• Documents improved: count of documents with higher scores